There is another reason that comes to mind; they have monopoly so nobody
offers a better alternative and nobody in the organization gets a reward
for suggesting improvements.
One day a component will brake and then they will have a long time of no
service but that does not matter as the
Dear Peter,
I agree. There needs to be more flexibility in the current opinions.
What I mean is that all to often the debate ends with a certain reason
something is wrong because of known facts.
That cut of the discussions and maybe the answer is in challenge a well
known truth. I think so. No I
http://othersideofmidnight.com/
Frank Znidarsic
Thanks, we will see it later.
Peter
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
Dear Peter,
I agree. There needs to be more flexibility in the current opinions.
What I mean is that all to often the debate ends with a certain reason
something is wrong
There are no bigger difference between government organizations and
private corporations in this.
There are more of the corps and
therefore there are more chance some of them fit to new realities.
On
Fri, 31 Jul 2015 19:03:17 +0300, Peter Gluck wrote:
Thanks, we will
see it later.
Peter
Yes, Torulf, ten individuals are more likely to find the golden egg than
one organization with ten people.
The cost of organize ten people will make it 80% effective at the best.
Then if there are 100 pathways the organization needs to make 100 starts.
It really is not a question of if they are
Just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/07/an-equivalent-of-michelson-morley.html
Very truly yours,
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Let me point out that Fleischmann and Pons both worked at government-owned,
government-run institutions for their entire careers, as did Mizuno,
Srinivasan, Storms, Miles and many others. Most cold fusion research has
been paid for by governments and conducted by government employees.
- Jed
Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com wrote:
Once again - nothing wrong with people in large organizations.
I am saying they could be more effective if broken down and organized for
rapid changes (read adapt to the reality we live in).
You are saying people could be more effective, in your
Hello Jed,
Once again - nothing wrong with people in large organizations.
I am saying they could be more effective if broken down and organized for
rapid changes (read adapt to the reality we live in).
I have no problem that many devoted and successful people have government
affiliation. On the
The point I am getting at here is that the early stages of basic research
into things like cold fusion are seldom profitable. Corporations seldom do
basic research for this reason. There was a time when ATT supported a lot
of fundamental research at Bell Labs, and IBM used to do a lot of
Hello Vincent,
I could not agree more. Large and aged private enterprises suffer from the
same decease.
There is no way that a CEO or department head can make a culture penetrate
the organization of age and size.
The hope is that even large organizations are allowed to fail. Not like
many
Yes, Jeff only the politician can handle it.
BS the reality is that we let them. We accept that we have less and less
input on the over all financial operations.
I believe that your priority list is accurate, or close enough. Are you
happy with that? I am not.
I have several reasons in descending
From Jed,
So corporations are pretty much ruled out. They cannot do cold fusion research
even if they want to, because it will not lead to immediate profits. Also
because
the stockholders and Wall Street speculators would be outraged to learn that a
corporation is doing cold fusion.
show The other side of midnight went well.
It will be available on the web.
I got to plug my book.
15 matches
Mail list logo
