Looks like snake oil to me.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rocha
To: John Milstone
Sent: Fri, Sep 11, 2015 10:43 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again:
It's probably explained here:
RE: [Vo]:Isotopic Analysis of Glowstick by Univ. of Missouri LabBob Cook wrote:
| The bigger question is how did Rossi get enriched Ni fuel in the first
place. Who produces such a commodity?
Not sure I can dig up a reference in time before I head out a bit, but Rossi
did mention that
There is a natural assumption all of us will naturally make assuming that
the buildup of lithium and nickel isotopic change in the ash happened at a
relatively constant rate over a long period of time. But what may have
happened is a one time explosive reaction where lithium and nickel
interacted
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:10 AM, David Roberson wrote:
But why does the force fall off with such a high power relationship with
> respect to separation?
Here's a Hyperphysics page that says that the range of the strong
interaction is limited in part because gluons carry
just a detail :
Rossi did not have control on the ashes, like skeptics say.
he was just present to watch if no error was done.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/12/13/transcript-of-radio-interview-with-bo-hoistad-on-the-lugano-e-cat-test-we-want-lenr-fusione-fredda/
Bo Höistad:
“Of course we were
It is here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/09/sep-12-2015-remembering-near-future-of.html
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
From: Eric Walker
* Jiang's experiment ran for 3 days, while the Lugano trial ran for 30
days The Lugano team reported 1.5 MWh excess heat… There is widespread
distrust of their methods, so let's divide that number by 10… In Jiang's or
MFMP's tests was excess heat seen on an order of
In August I wrote:
What is really interesting to me about the suggested +muon/electron system,
> or a muon/positron system, is that the masses are not equal. My intuition
> tells me that the matter/anti-matter combination should result in
> annihilation, but I'm really curious what the decay
RE: [Vo]:Isotopic Analysis of Glowstick by Univ. of Missouri LabFrom what I
know Rossi admitted at a meeting with NASA and others see:
http://home.mywebsearch.com/index.jhtml?ptb=BF377581-62D6-4739-AB64-CEBDCF6A6458=77fc6f7d=^XP^xdm002^S04978^us=CPOp2IKJlLYCFSRxQgodSV4ALw
at page 6.
It
From: alain.coetm...@gmail.com
just a detail : Rossi did not have control on the ashes, like skeptics say….he
was just present to watch if no error was done.
I hate to say it, but before I read Hotson's papers I thought the work on
sub-nucleon physics was amazing and beyond me. Now, with Hotson's
perspective added, my brain nags me in the background that contemporary
sub-nucleon theory is imaginary crap, built on a false foundation. The
physicists
Hi Jones,
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Earlier, in the report of Jiang from China wrt his glowstick cell, NO
> difference in the ratios for nickel isotopic ratios for samples before and
> after experiment are seen.
Some additional details that are
>From Jones:
...
> Given Mills' strong international patent portfolio and breadth of claims
> - that is strong motivation for Rossi to try to make his case for a
> nuclear, versus non-nuclear reaction.
I see two hats being placed on the magician's table. Which one will the
rabbit
>From e-cat world:
More Isotopic Analysis of MFMP Glowstick Fuel/Ash Published by Univ. of
Missouri Lab
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/09/11/more-isotopic-analysis-of-mfmp-glowstic
k-fuelash-published-by-univ-of-missouri-lab/
"The basic message of the results is that, to the ability of our
14 matches
Mail list logo