Re: [Vo]:A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's results

Holmlid also states that many other types of sub atomic particles are produced. Mesons of various types and pions are mentioned. The muon is a decay product of mesons. It is unclear what is initially produced and what is a decay product. The higher energy particles have a very short lifetime

Re: [Vo]:A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's results

A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's resultsJones-- A similar notion of the model of the proton, neutron etc. made up of electrons and positrons has been presented by Philippi Hatt at the ICCF-19 and also presented recently to the Russians at their invitation. Peter Gluck also

Re: [Vo]:Human Controlled Oscillator

A system of the type you suggest could also mask a negative resistance region. It effectively has a similar outward appearance since it is also an oscillator. The reason that I suspect that we are seeing a consequence of the existence of a negative resistance region is that they mention using

[Vo]:Re: A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's results

Philippi Hatt’s model may allow the calculation of the energy releases form LENR reactions with enough accuracy to confirm theory with existing EM monitoring capability. Expensive particle detection is probably not required IMHO. Since local B fields may cause modification of the predicted

Re: [Vo]:A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's results

If Protons were composed of Muons and Anti-Muons, both short lived and annihilate with each other, how could there be no evidence of Proton Decay? I didn't even finish reading, so maybe this was explained later, but that's all I had the time or head space to observe. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:43

[Vo]:Re: Revelations

Axil-- Compare the empirical fitting of mass in the Standard Model treatment you refer to with the actual model that Philippi Hatt had derived. Particularly look at Hatt’s accurate predictions for not only rest masses but the magnetic moments and his ability to calculate mass exactly way

[Vo]:Deuterium Powered Homes and the Return of Cold Fusion Hype | Hackaday

Not kind to Holmlid. http://hackaday.com/2015/10/05/deuterium-powered-homes-and-the-return-of-cold-fusion-hype/

[Vo]:NYT: Mars is probably contaminated with microbes from earth

What a shame. See: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/06/science/mars-catharine-conley-nasa-planetary-protection-officer.html

Re: [Vo]:Re: Revelations

One of the most important unfulfilled tasks in elementary particle physics is to develop a comprehensive mass formalism that encompasses leptons, quarks and hadrons. The Standard Model (SM) treatment of particle masses, which places leptons and hadrons in separate unrelated categories, has been

RE: [Vo]:A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's results

From: John Berry Ø If Protons were composed of Muons and Anti-Muons, both short lived and annihilate with each other, how could there be no evidence of Proton Decay? There is plenty of evidence of the aftermath of proton decay following a high energy collision, so I’m assuming you mean

Re: [Vo]:A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's results

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Jones Beene wrote: You don’t see any quarks. I believe this ad hoc result falls under the notion of "color confinement," meaning you don't find partial color charge in the wild. Instead you get a "hadron jet" of quark-antiquark pairs, whose

RE: [Vo]:A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's results

Let me try to be more specific on this point: Ø Ø Protons do not decay in a cold state, but if accelerated fast enough (as at CERN) – they will decay to 4 muons after a collision. This does not absolutely mean that protons are made of muons, but it is an indication of some kind of

Re: [Vo]:Human Controlled Oscillator

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:01 AM, David Roberson wrote: I consider this oscillator behavior an excellent additional indication of > proof that the Rossi effect is taking place during the experiment. Please forgive my ignorance of your thought experiment. Couldn't

Re: [Vo]:Translation of Parkhomov slides at recent Soshi meeting

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Teslaalset wrote: The Ni62 amendments to US2009125444 were sent to the patent office in April > 2013 while Rossi’s patent US9115913B1 originated as filing in March 2012. > US91159B1 does not mention specifically Ni62 in the claims,

[Vo]:Human Controlled Oscillator

The latest Russian replication of Rossi appears to demonstrate a perfect example of a human controlled oscillator. With a COP of greater than 2, the internal heat power generated within the core is capable of regeneration since it is a form of positive feedback. In this particular case there

Fwd: [Vo]:Translation of Parkhomov slides at recent Soshi meeting

Re-send, I got a mail bounce on this message: The Ni62 amendments to US2009125444 were sent to the patent office in April 2013 while Rossi’s patent US9115913B1 originated as filing in March 2012. US91159B1 does not mention specifically Ni62 in the claims, but instead the general term ‘Nickel’.

[Vo]:LENR INFO DOSIS FOR SEP 5, 2015

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/05-sep-2015-researchers-with-green.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's results

A provocative model of the proton has appeared on the web this year which can help explain the surprising results of Leif Holmlid. It comes from a retired nuclear engineer – Bill Stubbs. Stubbs also has an older book available on Amazon called “Nuclear Alternative”. Here is the gist of it