Re: [Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com

2016-04-20 Thread Axil Axil
Here is the reference that explains the justification for this statement: "Unruh radiation is the same as Hawking radiation by the equivalence principle." *Hawking radiation, Unruh radiation and the equivalence principle* *http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.5564 * On

Re: [Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com

2016-04-20 Thread Axil Axil
Assuming the radiation emitted by a LENR reactor is hawking radiation, it might be possible that the LENR reactor will accelerate in its frame of reference because it changes the nature of the vacuum in its frame of reference relative to the inertial frame of the universe. Hawking radiation makes

[Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com

2016-04-20 Thread Jack Cole
http://www.examiner.com/article/has-the-impossible-em-drive-being-tested-by-nasa-finally-been-explained

[Vo]:MIT Technology Review on the EM Drive

2016-04-20 Thread Eric Walker
See: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601299/the-curious-link-between-the-fly-by-anomaly-and-the-impossible-emdrive-thruster/ Not a whole lot new, but interesting to see the MIT Technology Review pick up the story. The article briefly describes Mike McCulloch's suggestion that Unruh

Re: [Vo]:LENR INFO- a smaller, bitter issue

2016-04-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
Russ George wrote: Bob, I believe the number of ‘inventors’ named on rejected cold fusion > patents is far more than 30. > In my opinion, some of those rejected patents deserved to be rejected. I do not have a tally, and I do not know how many good ones there were, but I

RE: [Vo]:Is the proton friable?

2016-04-20 Thread Jones Beene
Bob, Here is more detail with a lot of reference which I am trying to wade through -- but you may find easier to navigate. https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Strong_gravitational_constant Obviously – if there were a solid case for this proposition, it would have gotten traction many

[Vo]:I Sing the Car Electric

2016-04-20 Thread Terry Blanton
Who said they killed it. The Netherlands are moving to eliminate ICE altogether. http://www.sciencealert.com/the-netherlands-is-making-moves-to-ban-all-non-electric-vehicles-by-2025 Even Mercedes has seen the light: *https://youtu.be/_hFsig7hDcM * I wonder if

RE: [Vo]:LENR INFO- a smaller, bitter issue

2016-04-20 Thread Russ George
Bob, I believe the number of ‘inventors’ named on rejected cold fusion patents is far more than 30. Of course my effort is asking for people with such standing to participate in sharing some initial information is in part an effort to get some real data on this number! I know of more than half

Re: [Vo]:Is the proton friable?

2016-04-20 Thread Bob Higgins
After having read Dufour's paper, it appears that it is complete hypothesis on the basis of the fact that the other forces seem to converge in magnitude at a sub-nuclear scale - so why shouldn't gravitation? He presents no apparent data that his hypothesis has any basis. Gravitation would have

[Vo]:LENR- are there harbingers of clarification?

2016-04-20 Thread Peter Gluck
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/04/apr-20-2016-lenr-harbingers-of-coming.html My impression is that the enthusiasm for the evil part in the conflict is eroding. This is diplomatic and neutral -you can decide which part is (more) evil greetings, peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania

Re: [Vo]:LENR INFO- a smaller, bitter issue

2016-04-20 Thread Bob Higgins
Russ, have you estimated the number of people that would have standing in such a case against the USPTO? I think, to have standing, an inventor would have had to make a LENR patent application that was rejected. They may be later found to have been rejected for reasons other than LENR, but

RE: [Vo]:LENR INFO- a smaller, bitter issue

2016-04-20 Thread Russ George
Thanks Peter I do believe that this will ring some alarm bells in Washington. Hopefully no more SWAT teams appear to break down my door again. From: Peter Gluck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 2:38 AM To: VORTEX Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR INFO- a smaller, bitter

Re: [Vo]:cold fusion class action

2016-04-20 Thread H LV
Ruby, In this three minutes video clip Brian Eno discusses "scenius" in relation to Basic Income. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkD7JBspgas Harry On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Ruby wrote: > Love this vocabulary. > Been a fan of Eno for decades, never heard this! > Ruby > >

Re: [Vo]:cold fusion class action

2016-04-20 Thread Ruby
Love this vocabulary. Been a fan of Eno for decades, never heard this! Ruby On 4/19/16 5:19 PM, H LV wrote: In exchange for a small royalty fee, the State could provide free patent services. The royalties would affirm the existence of a collective intelligence or what the artist Brian Eno calls

Re: [Vo]:LENR INFO- a smaller, bitter issue

2016-04-20 Thread Peter Gluck
Thanks it is done.Your papers makes reader to think. peter On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Russ George wrote: > Peter, > > > > You might publish something about my new idea. I am serious about this. > > > > >