Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Eric Walker
Keep in mind as well that Holmlid adduces not only muons, but kaons and pions as well. Once we introduce (negative) kaons, we have the following decays to deal with: [image: Inline image 1] The neutral pion assures us that there will either be penetrating gammas or positrons, which lead to 511

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Bob Higgins
I believe that when the muon decays, if it is a negative muon, it decays into an electron and a pair of neutrinos. If it is a positive muon, it decays into a positron and 2 neutrinos. Before it decays, if it enters the electronic structure of an atom (likely in condensed matter), then it quickly

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Bob Higgins
Hi Fran, I am unable to imagine how something special would happen in that case. A muon in slow motion may have a greater chance of interaction if its energy is near the ionization energy of the atoms upon which it is incident - but this is only a small energy - less than 10eV. At higher

[Vo]:Article: Physicists Observe Rydberg Molecule for The First Time

2016-11-14 Thread Jack Cole
Physicists Observe Rydberg Molecule for The First Time http://flip.it/s9Qrqn

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Bob Cook
What is the mode of "decay" of free muons and, separately, in condensed matter? They seem not to produce any high energy EM nor radioactive products. If they did, I would assume this would have been reported unless it was intended to remain a secret. I consider based on reported muon models

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Axil's post is one interpretation of QM, other could be that the QM fields represents real fields e.g. no particles in space. This means that you can view QM as billiard with fields in stead of balls and things get to be much less mystic. Also Mills is starting to get real evidences of over unity

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Axil Axil
We are talking Quantum Mechanics here, not billards. In QM, superposition means that the muon can be in many places at once while it is in the entangled state. Distance does not matter. Where the muon ends up is based on decoherence of what has entangled the muon with the LENR reaction. It is all

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Bob, what if the “muon” doesn’t have to achieve light speed but rather becomes so “suppressed” think traveling thru a tiny Casimir cavity that the muons actual speed inside the cavity where vacuum wavelengths are dilate by suppression appears to achieve negative light speed relative to

[Vo]:LENR INFO tomorrow contacting ACS

2016-11-14 Thread Peter Gluck
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-14-2016-lenr-info.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

RE: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Russ George
The idea that the muons are interacting in solid matter with the electrons not the nuclei of atoms is very compelling to me. Indeed this may well explain two mysteries of my cold fusion muon/mischegunons, that is that very few are escaping the experiment cells. That what I have detected is the

RE: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Jones Beene
Bob, You are conflating two or more different Holmlid papers… He is unambiguous. The 10MeV particles are clearly stated to be “mainly protons from the fusion process and deuterons ejected by proton collisions” (see the abstract from the paper). The muon observations are from other

RE: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Jones Beene
From: Bob Higgins In this discussion, Jones presumes muons to be traveling at light speed… That is an oversight. It should read “a large fraction of light speed”… .

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Bob Higgins
In this discussion, Jones presumes muons to be traveling at light speed: The muon is an unstable fermion with a lifetime of 2.2 microseconds, which is an eternity compared to most beta decays. Ignoring time dilation, this would mean that muons, travelling at light speed, would be dispersing and

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Ian Walker
Hi all EDITED TO CORRECT AN ARRITHMETIC ERROR! ~600 m not 6000m By the way the density of the incidents has to be distributed across a sphere that is approximately 1,440,000 π (pi) meters squared. Then you have to plug in the distribution curve to get cubed meters for area. The numbers are

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Ian Walker
Hi all By the way the density of the incidents has to be distributed across a sphere that is approximately 144,000,000 π (pi) meters squared. Then you have to plug in the distribution curve to get cubed meters for area. The numbers are very big Hence why I think the density will be very small.

Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

2016-11-14 Thread Ian Walker
Hi all With that size of sphere, 6000m radius, I am guessing, from experience the density of interactions will be only a little above natural background. You need to know the surface area of the sphere. Then the distribution curve for the straight line from the source; then calculate peak and the