Re: [Vo]:EM Drive need not be outside the spacecraft

The conversion that you speak of is not as simple as it seems. If linear momentum is all that you have in the beginning then any generated angular momentum will always have an opposite brother that exactly negates the total when vector summed. Of course this is only true for a closed system.

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive need not be outside the spacecraft

Linear momentum and angular momentum are orthagonal to each other within a closed system. Each is conserved separately and one can not convert into the other. I have seen where linear momentum can be induced to generate two or more angular momentum components, but the vector sum of the system

[Vo]:Advanced Robotic Arm

Re: Fwd: [Vo]:Greek version of Rossi on PBS

It is John Kanzius (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kanzius) first reported to split water with RF. Otoh, I think I did it at 1996 with self resonating coil circuit (Bipeg) to split the water in air having high humidity and produced ozone as by product. Fields of the coil have rich harmonics

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive need not be outside the spacecraft

On 12/29/2016 02:31 PM, Vibrator ! wrote: LOL simply converting angular to linear momentums is trivial - think of a piston and crank, ball billiards or whatever.. You are confusing angular velocity, rotational energy, and kinetic energy with angular momentum and linear momentum. A crank

[Vo]:erase "anomalous" from the LENR dictionary

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-29-2016-do-not-call-lenr-or-excess.html -peter- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive need not be outside the spacecraft

LOL simply converting angular to linear momentums is trivial - think of a piston and crank, ball billiards or whatever.. What you're on about is varying net system momentum - ie. an N3 violation, linear or angular. Sure, if the motor's off then CoM / CoAM applies, and momentum's constant. I'm

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive need not be outside the spacecraft

On 12/29/2016 12:31 PM, Vibrator ! wrote: So, there's an intriguing thought to end on - if an EM-driven spacecraft subsequently decelerates again by simply performing a 180° rotation and continuing to apply constant thrust, all of the 'anomolous' momentum and energy is neatly returned to

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive need not be outside the spacecraft

On 12/29/2016 12:46 PM, Vibrator ! wrote: What's wrong with the centripetal tether example? With the engine turned off (no thrust) putting the tether in place doesn't change the angular momentum at all. The cross product of the linear momentum of the object with its radius vector remains

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive need not be outside the spacecraft

They are closely related, as angular momentum (in classical mechanics) is the sum of the angular momentum of each object in the system measured about its own axis, along with the sum of the linear momentum of each object crossed with its radius vector. Total angular momentum depends on where

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive need not be outside the spacecraft

What's wrong with the centripetal tether example? Are you supposing that there's a fundamentally different interaction manifesting inertia in angular vs linear accelerations? "Angons" vs "linons" or something? On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > > >

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive need not be outside the spacecraft

On 12/29/2016 12:31 PM, Vibrator ! wrote: Offering the implied presence of classical symmetry breaks as evidence of their impossibility - ie. "it can't be right because it'd break the laws of physics" - is surely redundant; the claim is explicitly a classical symmetry break, that's its whole

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive need not be outside the spacecraft

Offering the implied presence of classical symmetry breaks as evidence of their impossibility - ie. "it can't be right because it'd break the laws of physics" - is surely redundant; the claim is explicitly a classical symmetry break, that's its whole prospective value, and reason for our interest.

Re: [Vo]:Greek version of Rossi on PBS

Nigel Dyer wrote: We had a very good presentation of Browns Gas by the Hurtaks at the last water conference although no overunity was claimed, just that it was able to improve the efficiency of an internal combustion energy. This looks to be very similar to a classic Browns gas setup Nigel

Re: Fwd: [Vo]:Greek version of Rossi on PBS

Frank, The voice in the video is Stefan Hartmann who is German. He has an online blog where... IIRC... he says that there are two GHz frequencies used in the range of 150 GHz. The implication is that that the lower frequency waves from the two sources interact via interference to produce

Re: [Vo]:Greek version of Rossi on PBS

We had a very good presentation of Browns Gas by the Hurtaks at the last water conference although no overunity was claimed, just that it was able to improve the efficiency of an internal combustion energy. This looks to be very similar to a classic Browns gas setup Nigel On 28/12/2016