Jones—
I agree with you. I did not catch the meaning of the “wall” in your discussion
with Jack. I agree that it should be easy to measure electrical AC energy
consumed by the pulse generator.
I was focusing on the question of energy into the reactor introduced by the
pulse for
bobcook wrote:
> You say it is easy to measure pulsed power at the wall of the Godes reactor
> and suggest the measurements were accomplished, but covered up... You should
> suggest a method to do this “easy” measurement.
Bob,
Apparently my main underlying assumption - which is apparently
Jones—
You say it is easy to measure pulsed power at the wall of the Godes reactor and
suggest the measurements were accomplished, but covered up.
You should suggest a method to do this “easy” measurement. I can believe it is
difficult to get an integrated measure of energy transfer across
See:
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=37692
Worldwide, demand for coal rose slightly in 2017. 2018 data is probably not
available yet. See:
https://www.iea.org/coal2018/
Addendum: what is specifrically involved in a generalized "superwave"
mechanism?
The answer probably involves "energy localization" as a first step in a two
step process.
There are two kinds of energy localization, one operating at the nano-scale and
one at the astro-scale. Obviously we are
Jack,
You are right-on about the input power having never been measured (or at least
not reported) at the wall... which situation is all the more problematic since
the input power is the one key feature - the defining feature of Godes'
technique and "Q-pulse" IP, just as with all the other
At one time, I had high hopes for Godes. The more I followed him, it
became more evident that he and everyone else were enamored with his skills
and credentials as an EE. Neither he, nor others, are skeptical enough of
his results to figure out what he has done wrong. It probably wouldn't be
7 matches
Mail list logo
