[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake

Jack Cole wrote: > Unless Mizuno can/did address the following problems addressed in the > paper I linked > to in the > previous email, his work has been debunked. > I strongly disagree. > He [Piantelli] supposedly was going to

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake

On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 7:50 PM Jed Rothwell wrote: > Jack Cole wrote: > > >> Parkhomov, Defkalion, me356, Rossi of course (consider the connected >> papers conducted by academics) . . . >> > > Parkhomov maybe. I don't know if he a professional, and he never > published. I meant published

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake

Jack Cole wrote: > Parkhomov, Defkalion, me356, Rossi of course (consider the connected > papers conducted by academics) . . . > Parkhomov maybe. I don't know if he a professional, and he never published. I meant published results in the scientific literature. > , possibly Brillouin

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake

On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 6:51 AM Jed Rothwell wrote: > Jack Cole wrote: > > We've seen errors this big before. >> > > I do not think so. Rossi apparently made errors this big, and much bigger: > 1 MW. (I think this was fraud, not error.) But I do not know recall any > professional scientist who

[Vo]:Palladium now more valuable than gold

Interesting that palladium at $1400/ ounce or 27 grams - is now more expensive than gold and almost twice as valuable as platinum. This – despite the electric car phenomenon. 80% of all mined Pd goes into catalytic converters. The Russians are said to control the market for Pd in one way

RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake

Jack, When your post came through, I was thinking about the simple experiments you did some time ago with nickel and nitinol and whether or not anything from the recent Mizuno reports could be transposed to simple electrolysis experiments, in general. It could be worth thinking about.

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake

Jack Cole wrote: We've seen errors this big before. > I do not think so. Rossi apparently made errors this big, and much bigger: 1 MW. (I think this was fraud, not error.) But I do not know recall any professional scientist who has published a paper which was later shown to have errors on this

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake

We've seen errors this big before. Best to not get too excited until there is a replication. Based on history, every time there has been an amazing result like this, it has turned out to be either a huge mistake, unreplicable, or fraudulent (I don't suspect fraud at all in this case). I hope