In reply to Andrew Meulenberg's message of Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:50:22 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Both classical and quantum physicists get fixed within their own framework.
>"To a hammer, everything looks like a nail."
If a hammer is all you have in your toolbox, then it's severely lacking. ;)
[snip]
If
In reply to Vibrator !'s message of Sat, 23 Jul 2022 13:55:04 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>The issue is that a graviton would be a spin-0 gauge boson, commuting only
>attractive force; a spin-1 mediator of both attractive and repulsive
>forces is obvs already fulfilled by photons or virtual photons.
>
Sean,
You asked "Is it meaningful to speak of "resonance" when something is
rotating in only one direction?"
Consider a car engine. Ignoring any internal resonances, it has a max-power
point at some frequency. If you add a muffler, you have modified the
external environment to the engine (most
Some incredible updates to report on:
• the list now includes many more examples of box-orbs linking up like this
You can watch as two box-orbs approach one another, touch and partially
merge, then extrude the tether out between them as they part. Then they
fly off together as a unit. There's
The issue is that a graviton would be a spin-0 gauge boson, commuting only
attractive force; a spin-1 mediator of both attractive and repulsive
forces is obvs already fulfilled by photons or virtual photons.
Qualitatively, 'gravity' reduces to a time-constant rate of exchange of
signed momentum,
Hi,
See https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304885319325454
If no one clicked on ads companies would stop paying for them. :)
6 matches
Mail list logo