First a warning, , If your trying to build an cold fusion device for
profit via patents you may want to skip this article. Otherwise you will
have first hand knowledge of prior art.
If you curious like me and just want to understand how things work, then
this is probably an interesting read.
I
Thanks Alan for the URL to Yeong's slides. That really helped clarify in
my mind what is happening in this device. A number of people have
mentioned how impressive the Defkalion live demonstration was, and yet
how amateurish it appears. It really wasn't an amateur presentation, far
from it.
Very interesting discussions. Thanks Axil for the two links in your
earlier note.. I saw the video, but I wasn't aware of the paper
presentation that described the isotopic shifts. So far, it looks like a
very convincing experiment that looks to have nuclear origins. There are
so many
minutes. This cannot be a hot fusion mechanism.
The spark produces nanoparticles that are gradually consumed, It is LENR
for sure.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
Very interesting discussions. Thanks Axil for the two links in your
earlier note.. I
leading to Cu that had very low emissions.
Correction to my previous comment, I meant 11 pulse's per second. But
Axil that was the only system they had to control the reaction was the
modulated spark plug pulse.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
If I
I guess one of the reasons I just don't get the Rydberg atom hypothesis, is
that mainly has to do with the electron orbitals and not the nuclear state.
That's my understanding at least. Perhaps Kim's paper will enlighten how
the nuclei interact to show a strong interaction; one that follows
Hi All, Wow!
I've been watching and thinking about the Delkcalion (cold fusion?)
experiment, and wondered what you guys thought was actually happening
there. It was a great demonstration. That small device certainly seemed
to get wildly hot. If H gas + some nano-NI powder generated that
of the strong
force's influence.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
What I'm suggesting is that in an electric field like the background of
charge of the electrons in a metal
:39 AM, Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
For what Daniel, the Axil nano-antenna + e + photon = BEC or my raisin
in a charged pudding model that creates a tightly shrunken electron orbital
radius for the H s(n=1) quantum state that creates a virtual neutron?
I misspelled hydrino as hydro
I think I understand know how a virtual neutron can be created in the a
metal like Ni or Pd. First I've never have been a hydro fan, because it
seemed to violate the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. If it
sub S(n=1) quantums states did exist in H there should be a very strong
with a new thermalized electron
temperature close to absolute zero. It immediately forms a Bose-Einstein
condensate which can thermalize emitted gamma rays from the nuclear
reaction.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I understand know how a virtual
Robin, I think you have it right there. It would be just like the
Mössbauer effect! Consider that the Ni62 is already bound to a lattice and
virtual neutron's embedded electron is loosely coupled, the core of the
(Ni62 or excited Cu63) would be the receiver/emitter of the energy. There
would
For what Daniel, the Axil nano-antenna + e + photon = BEC or my raisin in
a charged pudding model that creates a tightly shrunken electron orbital
radius for the H s(n=1) quantum state that creates a virtual neutron?
I misspelled hydrino as hydro earlier, I hope everyone recognizes that
this is
Ahh, the old jump through these hoops and we might publish reply.
Considering they said pretty minor it may be they hit their limits on
number of articles. I wouldn't be too discouraged. You might want to be
proactive with the publishers, give them a call on the phone ... poke
around, ask
Thank you Axil,
After looking at that power point for a few hours now, it has me
deeply intrigued. I really never looked into WL theory on LENR because
it seemed pretty far fetched that nuclear-weak interactions could be
driving the heat events. It's probably a bias I developed when
Great post Ed! I've thought along those same lines as well (as I'm sure
many bright people have). I won't say that CF theory require miracles, but
it does require something very unusual an unique. We already have one
unique aspect; that being the Hydrated Metal. Astronomic properties of
Wasn't Ishida a graduate student under Steve Jones? I had a really
nice correspondence with Steve regarding the NULL results from the
Kamiokande experiments. What I heard was they thought they were getting
good results with D2O+cement (the so called natural soup) but it
so overwhelmed the
I think you are being very dismissive of the way quantum mechanics works
with in the nuclear realm. It all boils down to PSI and if the nuclear
force is point charge with a probability of interacting defined by PSI, or
that PSI is blurred motion where the nuclear force is spread over space
: Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 10, 2013 4:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature
HI Ed,
I think it is apparent that a BEC in it's normal sense with temps at
near absolute zero is out of the question
previous ideas might be applied,
but only as PART of the process.
Ed
On Feb 10, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Chuck Sites wrote:
HI Ed,
I think it is apparent that a BEC in it's normal sense with temps at
near absolute zero is out of the question as you note. There are too many
problems like
of assumptions having no relationship
to the theory of the BEC and total ignorance about the electron structure
in PdD. What constitutes a boson is even uncertain in such a structure.
I suggest you read my explanation.
Ed
On Feb 8, 2013, at 11:33 PM, Chuck Sites wrote:
Its great to read Kim's
Its great to read Kim's reply. I;ve followed Dr. YE Kim's work for years
along with the Scott and Talbot Chubbs. I was convinced years ago, that
the only mechanism that would work for cold fusion was a BEC. A
Bose Einstein Condensate. It's a known physics fact that particles that
enter the
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
Heartland is funded by Koch, and other deep pocket anonymous donors.
I have to give them some credit -- tactically speaking, they are quite
.
Best Regards,
Chuck
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations for proving the point that the deniers are idiots.
I'm sympathetic to the idea that climate change
closed for a week and a couple of members being banned. Do
you want to see that happen again?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Feb 7, 2013 2:02 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT Global Warming
The reality of AGW
Hi Craig and other vortexers.
I would like to respond to several of your comments. First on the
issue of Solar Irradiance or the solar forcing as it's described in the
computer models. it is certainly the main contributing factor to heat of
the atmosphere. No doubt about it. Sometimes it
The reality of AGW IS an no-brainer, and it IS the deniers that are plain
stupid. That is a fact jack. Tere are 2 scientist that say so against
your 5.Give it up deniers, you lost this debate in like 2009.
Chuck
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Vorl bek says: Look at this authoritive website for answers, and it points
to a rightwing funded propaganda machine called whatsupwiththat.
Congratulations for proving the point that the deniers are idiots.
Best Regards,
Chuck
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com
Hi Craig, and fellow vortexians,
I'm looking at your graph on temperature anomalies and every data point
is above 0. Shouldn't some of you anomalies be negative. You have 16
years of positive anomalies but not a single negative. I think that proves
the point that temperatures are trending
Haha. Yeah I saw that story, It's just bait for the deniers
(or contrarians), or just weird science to normal folks. For that matter,
mushrooms exhale CO2.Trust me, worms are not the cause of global
warming.
I want to reply to Craig's comments and to argue scientifically against his
by additional
thermal energy dumped in the oceans from global warming. I encourage
everyone to look for the really high vapor clouds.
--
Chuck
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 12:27 AM, Chuck Sites wrote:
Haha. Yeah I saw that story, It's
I'm probably going to make a few enemies, but the deniers of global warming
(skeptic is too kind, Contrarian is more like it) really need to head over
to NOAA.gov or Climate.gov and see what all of many
different satellite data are showing. First, let's answer Craig's
comments about not knowing
Hi Jack,
Keep on experimenting! Your following the same track that I did, and
Nitinol was one thought I had. The idea at the time was to load hydrogen
into nitinol, and then crank up the current to flex the metal lattice with
the H embedded in the crystal structure. I think I had the
Hi Ed, and fellow vortexians, I've been thinking about the issue of proton
fusion in metals, that is can H in metals be so condensed to start the
proton-proton chain reaction within a metal lattice. The proton-proton
chain reaction is initiated with a strong interaction between two protons,
I'm sorry to break from scientific debates on Cold Fusion, but to be
honest, JoJo has dominated this mailing list for several weeks now with
very little response and light response from the Vortex-L mail list. If I
may, I would like to suspend the rules and use 4 letter words If that is
OK with
Thanks for sharing the video Jack. I really like how your controlling
that with and Android and IOIO microcontroller.I'm a beginner Android
developer and the little IOIO PIC device is really cool.That is a great
way of doing a duty cycle on the AC/DC.
Here is a nice discussion on the
What a bunch of horse shit. I'm so sorry I went to follow up, and it's
like being a Dem shouted down at a Tea party rally.
Example quote: Alas, those are ideal conditions for crackpots to
flourish. I'm not much of a debater, but what do you say to that? If you
ever study logic, this statement
Good Luck with the new experiments David. I think you will see some
interesting effects. Regarding the sparks and light flashes, I ran across
a paper that describes an spark effect, but it was seen in the 100-140Volt
range. Horace Heffner describes it in his paper;
Nice reference Alan,
Yes, I also encourage the basement experimentalist to be-careful with these
experiments. The boranes (ie. B_x H_y) can be toxic, and even
explosive. B2H4 is rocket fuel. Throw sodium in the mix, hydrogen and
oxygen, Its like lighting a match. Chemically. I ran these
that the copper might be taken away
from the nickel surface selectively? It might be possible to selectively
erode the copper leaving NAE in large quantities.
Dave
P.S. AC in my posting is standard line frequency in the US which is 60
hertz.
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Sites cbsit
David,
I never had any problems either with an open system or a closed system.
Just remember that hydrogen like to burn straight up, so if running
covered, be sure the cover can be easily removed upward. When I ran
closed, I used a large cork at the top, and all the gasses tended to
Keep us updated Dave, I never saw sparks in my experiments so you are onto
something new. I do remembers several events though, that are just as you
described, the voltage and current will just swing madly around as the
water boils and it will last as long as electrolyte is available. But
of
dislocations in metal lattices occurs all of the time. It's normal at
interfaces in binary materials; like the Copper/Nickel interface blends.
Fire it up baby!
Chuck Sites
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Emeka Okafor
Wow, what a great batch of articles. The borax article in www,
sparkbangbuzz.com just blew my mind. I did notice the weird electrical
capacitance, but I dismissed that as a Battery effect of electrolysis, the
positive ion build up on the nickel and the negative ion build up on the
electrode.
use more than 884g of water, we are sure that there is another
energy source (chemical or other).
--
*From:* ken deboer [mailto:barlaz...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* lundi 1 octobre 2012 19:00
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Replication of Chuck Sites Nickel
the readout making it 20F too high because of some deposit on the
metal that could not be removed.
Jack
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
Jack,
Congratulations, your report is exactly in lines with what I saw
with Ni(+) Cu(-) in my jar experiments
Hi Eric,
I think your right. The yttrium signal was Tom Droege's Pd/D cell.
This was Pd/D just so there is no confusion with the Ni/H experiments. I
wish I could recall what Tom's theory was. He was pretty excited about it
though. To be honest with everyone, I think it was a
Impressive. I want one of those in my basement just to detect the radon
grin.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 9:42:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Alan's Sites Effect Experiment
Jed,
You probably remember Tom Droege the Electrical Engineer from Fermi
lab. He had a live PF replication running for few months and would post
his latest measurements in Usenet's sci.physics.fusion group. I think he
did eventually publish a conference paper on coloremetry, but his
. It was so
refreshing to read, compared to the bias of Frank Close and Too Hot to
Handle. Mallove seemed like a great guy. I'm sorry you lost your friend.
Good people like that are rare.
Chuck,
---
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Chuck Sites cbsit
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Good Alloy for Celani type reaction costs 5 cents :
Chuck Sites
At 02:18 PM 9/27/2012, David Roberson wrote:
I also placed my connections above the bath. With Borax, they had to be
fairly close together to get 1 amp. I estimate from memory about 1/2 inch
maximum.
Thanks
Hi Lomax,
First, I've enjoyed reading your posts as a lurker;
I remember that hit piece in Science from Lewis very well. It was
disturbing and really put the whole of Cold Fusion into doubt. Nathan
Lewis, published a really good analysis on calorimetry of electrolysis and
the physics thermal
Yeah, and remember I was trying to achieve Boron-Hydrogen fusion. At the
beginning of the PF announcement, Pons' and Flieshman suggested that the
electrolysis over potential could induce pressures at the surface of the
metal that are literally astronomical. I don't recall exactly, but it was
such as this when you were destroying materials and transformers.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Sep 24, 2012 4:37 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Good Alloy for Celani type reaction costs 5 cents :
Chuck Sites
Yeah, and remember I
Hi Arnaud,
Yes, I did try two other electrolytes; Boric Acid (H3BO3) was one,
and Potassium Hydroxide (KOH). Mills was a proponent of the KOH and nickel
and his shrunken hydrogen theory (the hydrino concept) was interesting.
He put some work into, but I could never get it to work. The
Hi. I guess I'm no longer a lurker.
Fascinating. I can't wait to see the video.Just so know how machined
the
coins into electrodes; I just used a hacksaw and made two cuts into the
coin
to make a tab, and then bent it up with needle nose pliers. The tab was
about 1/8 thick and stood
Sites
*From:* Chuck Sites
Just to make clear, the nickel was always on the + side of the power
supply,
and is described in Wikipedia as the cathode.
Hmm … I’m usually the mildly dyslexic one, but someone is confused: the
+ or positively charged electrode is the “anode
57 matches
Mail list logo
