gh I think the
Lugano test provides quite a bit of evidence. *
*Craig*
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/09/sep-22-2016-lenr-
> finding-essence-of-1mw.html
>
> quite good info..
>
> peter
>
&
,
then I wouldn't rule for Rossi on this issue. But otherwise, don't put
me on a jury and expect unwritten assumptions to be honored.
Craig
endent
evaluation or opting out if he disagrees with the final report.
His saving grace may be that Rossi is looking like a fraud with the
information we've currently seen; and that may not go unnoticed by the
court.
Craig
That the client is no longer in business at the end of the 350 day test,
is telling...
Craig
On 08/14/2016 09:11 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote:
Here a picture and information about the "customer" warehouse. It is
only 6000 square feet and the height is 20 feet.
Let's do a Fer
take it on
faith that what appears to be an objective Universe, with rules
which are the same for everyone, is true.
Craig
Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proofs. Your metaphysical
claims demand more than intellectual wankerism.
I'm not making an extraordinary claim. You
On 08/11/2016 05:47 PM, Che wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Craig Haynie
<cchayniepub...@gmail.com <mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Actually, you have to have faith in an objective Universe.
Craig
Having faith in things which can be prove
>>>The word "faithful" has no place in science or engineering.
- Jed
Actually, you have to have faith in an objective Universe.
Craig
lly expected.
Craig
No way Rossi's actions are fraud, from reselling the licensing, (unless
he has a known faulty product). The best IH can hope for is a null
contract; not the rights to the IP.
On 07/01/2016 03:59 PM, Bob Higgins wrote:
It is interesting and self-destructive that Rossi appears to have
g
inside the SunCell.
This doesn't make sense because Mills has a theory which explains
precisely how much energy and power he expects to generate in each
experiment. He couldn't have made a mistake like this. Surely he has
compared his experimental results with his theoretical results.
Craig
.
To me, this really makes him look bad. If he's legitimate, he needs to
push this new discovery aside, and get something out as soon as possible
to maintain any kind of credibility.
Craig
On 06/17/2016 04:06 PM, Craig Haynie wrote:
This is discouraging. What makes Mills special is that he
am at a loss as to how he could have discovered
another amazing energy source without using theory.
Craig
On 06/17/2016 03:57 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
From the quote, that is a conclusion that is now coming out of BLP.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Craig Haynie
<cchayniepub...@gmail.
Axil, are you saying that Mills' theory, which he has used to develop
this process, has now failed him and can no longer explain it?
Craig
On 06/17/2016 03:38 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
R, Mills has alway asserted that the energy that he sees in his
experiments were based on CHEMICAL processes
"ecatnews.com closes".Agreed. The eCat is as dead as a short-sighted mouse who's just mistakenly walked into a cats only nightclub during a time of extreme famine.
Original Message
Subject: [Vo]:ecatnews.com closes
From: Jed Rothwell
Date: Wed, June 15,
e failures, and no recent success.
I read this to refer to the individual small reactors that were part of
the larger 1MW reactor.
Craig
for that?
For a solution to be correct, all the pieces have to fit into place, and
if money wasn't a factor in this, then things just don't all fit
together for me. I know we'll have more information as time goes on. I'm
happy waiting for it.
Craig
.
Craig
There's nothing in the dispute which hinges on whether the device works,
or not. That point may never be brought up.
Craig
On 06/03/2016 10:04 AM, a.ashfield wrote:
IH has apparently sent Krivit a copy of their legal response to the
court case.
From a quick scan it doesn’t look like
>>>It seems that there would be a way to test the hypothesis that grays are
living under the White House and get some hard data.
Why would you want to?
Craig
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Steph
Learned something new today. What are "grays"?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/92/65/96/926596fc73fadc74a03a639b60968884.jpg
Craig
else at this point, to allow them to draw any
of their own conclusions, then this could only hurt Rossi's case in court.
Why Darden signed that document, is beyond me. It makes him look like a
fool.
Craig
WHAT? Sorry, but this isn't what I quoted. Something is playing tricks.
Nevermind...
Craig
On 05/16/2016 07:03 PM, Craig Haynie wrote:
On 05/16/2016 06:46 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
This building is 10,800 sq. ft.
Not that it changes much, but according to Mats, the building was
1,000
-plus-more-updates/
Craig
e; nor did it allow them to certify, or
reject, the evaluation of the EVR; and they agreed to Rossi's guy,
Penon. Why?
It doesn't make sense to me. It's not something that their lawyers
should have allowed; nor something I would have agreed to, if I was
Darden, unless I was certain of the outcome.
Craig
h leads me to believe that no one even bothers to seriously talk to
him. Has Eagleworks even flown him down to their lab to discuss this?
Craig
On 04/27/2016 06:32 PM, Russ George wrote:
New Physics and the EM Drive is rising and illustrates the crisis in physics
being experienced by the dogmat
the temperature went above 1020c. The timing couldn't really have been
much better. This occurred at 2016-04-16 02:00 UTC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUyWnN--u7M=youtu.be=13188
Craig
On 04/16/2016 11:27 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
This temperature differential is more meaningful than it seems since
some
The optical imager is typically reading between an 18c and 20c difference.
Craig
On 04/16/2016 11:03 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
Interesting. I hope a post-run calibration shows that when the fuel
is removed, the active and null outside temperatures return to one
another to within experimental
60c on the latest...
https://youtu.be/VLK19pllG9g?t=6278
On 04/16/2016 10:53 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:01 AM, CB Sites > wrote:
I have to say. This one is pretty fascinating. At 1000+C they
had a delta T of 30C
difference is between 3 and 4 standard deviations from the
calibration, and 60c, (which occured for a few minutes), is over 4
standard deviations from the calibration.
Is this the correct way to calculate error?
Craig
On 04/16/2016 09:15 AM, Craig Haynie wrote:
Now 60c
On 04/16/2016 07:19 AM
Now 60c
On 04/16/2016 07:19 AM, Craig Haynie wrote:
Now 50c.
On 04/16/2016 03:01 AM, CB Sites wrote:
I have to say. This one is pretty fascinating. At 1000+C they had a
delta T of 30C between a fueled and unfueled cell that lasted for
hours, until I gave up.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2
Now 50c.
On 04/16/2016 03:01 AM, CB Sites wrote:
I have to say. This one is pretty fascinating. At 1000+C they had a
delta T of 30C between a fueled and unfueled cell that lasted for
hours, until I gave up.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Che
be
qualified to make that determination is Barry West, and I don't know who
he is.
The other thing that confuses me, is why did IH send out that rather
pessimistic release on Mar 10, before they had any report to view?
It's not that clear cut to me.
Craig
On 04/15/2016 03:51 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> It is for the courts to decide whether the omission of a clause like this
>>> prevents the application of common sen
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> IH had already paid Rossi $11.5 million, and Rossi had already given IH
>> his IP.
>>
>
> I.H. says the device does n
er side would have the option to opt-out if they didn't like the
report. IH had already paid Rossi $11.5 million, and Rossi had already
given IH his IP. Both sides had reasons to compel the other to the
completion of the contract.
Craig
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
>
> Some people have said that Penon is the sole ERV author listed in the
> contract and therefore whatever he says must be accepted by both sides.
> Last year I.H. said they would abide by whatever he said, so now
This is a good point. IH can just as easily release the report. It's not
just Rossi's reluctance.
Craig
On 04/13/2016 06:08 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
Jed,
If the ERV report supports IH, why have they not released it?
statement on March 10, 19
days before Rossi received the results of the ERV test.
This is why I think that IH simply didn't raise enough money to justify
the commitment. The money they have isn't theirs to spend, if it's
investor money from investors who weren't taking this risk.
Craig
t;
https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/test-of-e-cat-october-6.pdf
Craig
On 04/12/2016 07:59 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com
<mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com>> wrote:
The legal case does not hinge on whether the device works. As the
agreement is worded, IH pays IF and WHEN the ERV signs a document
tha
, since he signed the agreement). There is no need to
determine if the device actually works, for Rossi to win his lawsuit.
Craig
irm in writing the Guaranteed Performance."
I don't see where IH has the authority under the agreement to make any
kind of judgment on the report.
Craig
On 04/10/2016 10:37 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>
wrote
Rossi also wants his intellectual property back. Last year, IH filed a
patent on Rossi's technology.
Craig
On 04/10/2016 09:47 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com <mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> wrote:
IH is now being discarded,
If he is discarding I.H. why
g through this one-year
test, which took time and effort.
Craig
On 04/10/2016 03:17 PM, Brad Lowe wrote:
And if I were 'there', I'd too be calling for different testing.
why wait an entire year to mention it --
and where did they mention this? Everything I've read indicates that
they agreed to the test, agreed to the ERV, and decided afterwards, by
some other means, that it couldn't be shown to work.
Craig
that party was chosen, then it looks like they have to
pay up if the report is positive, and meets the required specifications.
There doesn't appear to be an option to decline, at this point.
Craig
On 04/10/2016 10:30 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Teslaalset
d to
them in this deal which IH did not finalize, then this would explain why
Rossi is suing, instead of just letting it go.
Craig
made by IH."
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892
Craig
On 04/07/2016 09:56 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Robert Dorr <rod...@comcast.net <mailto:rod...@comcast.net>> wrote:
I keep seeing that supposedly I.H. was the one that built the
e-cat used in the Lugano
massive parallel reactors, he
must be on shoe strings.
Rossi: " Yes, Leonardo Corporation has the financial resources necessary
to make the massive production we need."
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892=88#comments
Craig
On 04/07/2016 09:36 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
*From:*Craig Haynie
ØThey also paid Rossi $10 million dollars, after validating that the
device was working…
Not exactly. The logical error is cause and effect. Yes, they paid the
installment, but elsewhere they clearly state that "Indus
al and pay the $89 million, but
I think it's quite likely that they didn't raise as much money as they
thought they would during this past year, and had to bail on the agreement.
Craig
. Then I
understand, from the license agreement, that the money was released to
Rossi.
Craig
You're right. I have made two mistakes in two days. Something's wrong.
I'm just not concentrating on what I'm writing. :)
Craig
On 04/07/2016 07:54 PM, Robert Dorr wrote:
It wasn't a month long test, it was a 24 hour test performed in
Ferrara Italy. I keep seeing that supposedly I.H
They also paid Rossi $10 million dollars after validating that the
device was working for a month.
Craig
On 04/07/2016 06:54 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
"Industrial Heat has worked for over three years to substantiate the
results claimed by Mr. Rossi from the E-Cat technology – all wi
I agree; the $10 million was paid. Sorry for the confusion.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> See section 3.2(b).
See section 3.2(b). The $10,000,000 is held in escrow.
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0001.2.pdf
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
wrote:
> "I think the fight is over the $10
"...then Rossi would be smart to simply cancel IH's license and go for
his own $500 billion IPO next month. Let IH sue him if they don't like
the cancellation."
I think the fight is over the $10 million in escrow, which looks like it
may go back to IH if the deal falls through.
Cr
"‘The attached photo has been made in our factory in Miami, Florida, and
is related to the plant “E-Cat the New Fire” manufactured by Leonardo
Corporation to supply thermal energy’"
From 2015:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/05/05/new-image-of-the-e-cat-plant-on-trademark-applicati
Actually, this whole mystery could be the result of a failure by IH to
raise the expected $89 million to finalize the deal. This might explain
why they took this to the end of the trial.
Craig
tatus, were routinely reported
to DARDEN, VAUGHN,
IH and IPH by ROSSI, the ERV and IH/IPH's agents Mr. Fabiani and Mr. V/est."
Craig
And the winner is Jone Beene!!
"I have recently re-read the Pinon report, which is an absolute mockery
of the scientific system, and if Pinon turns out to be the ERV, then we
are in the early stages of a gigantic lawsuit. "
Craig
On 03/31/2016 08:54 PM, Jones Beene wrote
This doesn't make any sense. If there was some kind of thrust being
developed in the ecat, along the lines of the emdrive, then no one would
ever know. If no one tries to measure it, they'll never see it, or
suspect it.
Craig
On 04/04/2016 10:00 AM, Ron Kita wrote:
Greetings Vortex-L,
I
have people who've purchased these machines, come out in unison that
they're all amazed at how much money they're saving. Neither Rossi, nor
Mills, seem to be interested in the former.
Craig
On 03/31/2016 07:35 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com
<mailto:cchay
year warranty.
Craig
On 03/31/2016 06:53 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Craig,
Mills has been planning to "get to market sometime next year" for the last 20
years. Yawn. I hope he does, but there is not proof that he can do it.
Sure, if Rossi gets to market first - fine ... no one
Rossi has released a lot more than Mills, and they both seem to be on
similar paths. Like Rossi, Mills is planning to start selling next year.
If Rossi starts selling, that will be all the proof he needs.
Craig
This won't be resolved completely until Rossi sells a few of these things.
Craig
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks for the thought provoking post… I agree.
>
> Group think and consensus can be more powerful, more wide
This is an interesting video. He takes a load off of the Orbo, and
watches the voltage increase.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UbKcgyCVzI#t=14.024172
Craig
On 03/28/2016 10:33 PM, Craig Haynie wrote:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/03/29/ecw-orbo-testing-week-8-orbo-cell-now-behaving
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/03/29/ecw-orbo-testing-week-8-orbo-cell-now-behaving-according-to-steorns-claims/
Craig
Rossi is the man in the lead?
Unless Mills is lying, he is miles ahead of Rossi. If this is the case,
then all Mills has to do is walk up and claim his Nobel prize.
Craig
On 03/25/2016 09:40 AM, Ron Kita wrote:
Nice presentation..I almost missed it:
http://newenergytreasure.com/2016/03/18
at 200 m/s. When
calculating the acceleration of a rocket, one doesn't use distance
travelled. The calculation uses force multiplied by time. The
acceleration doesn't drop off as the rocket increases in speed.
Craig
On 03/14/2016 12:17 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Craig Haynie
ergy, over a given period of time, simply
because it's moving, would violate Einstein's Special Relativity which
says there's no preferred frame of reference. The moving object cannot
be said to be moving at all.
Craig
On 03/13/2016 02:27 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
Shawyer's theory explicitly
One advantage the EMDrive has over LENR, is that it's fairly replicable.
The amateurs can do it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbf7735o3hQ
Craig
Reading between the lines... Does it sound like they're preparing us for
a negative report on Rossi's one year test?
Craig
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 11:32 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> [Marianne Macy asked me to post this]
>
>
> The following statement has been released from Ind
The number is a little too perfect, don't you think?
8,400,000 kwh / 350 days / 24 hours/day = exactly 1.000 mw of power
output.
Craig
On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 19:57 +0200, Peter Gluck wrote:
>
>
> do not take this literally
>
>
> I bet we will have more info tomorrow o
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 06:43 -0800, Jones Beene wrote:
> What am I missing?
>
Gamma Rays!
Craig
From: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project QuantumHeat.org
[mailto:m.fleischmann.memor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 7:13 PM
To: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project QuantumHeat.org
Subject: We. did. it... together.
Dear Donor,
During ICCF-17 in
liticized. This goes to the heart of capitalism.
Craig
>
thing can be verified.
> This appears to be a staged production of no scientific value. It is
> simply another PR event to raise funding.
Yes, but it would still be fun to watch. I'm wondering if Mills is
presenting a self-sustaining generator? Anything less would be
disappointing at thi
"Energy is roughly 10Wh"
They're saying it will self-recharge indefinitely.
Craig
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Teslaalset <robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Price is 1200 Euro
> Power generation is 0.4W
> Energy is roughly 10Wh
> Weight is 300 grams, most
"Perhaps the Steorn device also has a lithium battery to account for its
higher cost."
Yes, they said it has a lithium battery in their presentation. Supposedly,
the battery recharges continuously.
Craig
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Teslaalset <robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com&g
015 at 22:30, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote:On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Craig Brown <cr...@overunity.co> wrote: > > Teaser PROMO for upcoming LIVE Steorn Free Energy Webinars featuring their > O-Cube > > ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3FmbNkfgS4 Retur
e: Wed, October 28, 2015 3:41 pm
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Wow Craig, just read that the price of the O-Cube will be revealed today!I sincerely hope it's in the 100s to the 200 euros, rather than 500-1000-2000+ euros. as I seriously could maybe afford that if it's <200€.maybe.http://freeenergy.ne
Webinars Announced - Product
Demonstrations
From: Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, October 23, 2015 5:30 am
To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Craig Brown <cr...@overunity.co> wrote:
>
> Teaser PROMO fo
Teaser PROMO for upcoming LIVE Steorn Free Energy Webinars featuring their O-Cubettps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3FmbNkfgS4
Original Message
Subject: RE: [Vo]:NEW LIVE Steorn Webinars Announced - Product
Demonstrations
From: "Craig Brown" <cr...@overunity.
On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 17:26 -0400, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Note that this work was done in the 1990s, so it was not affected by
> Rossi.
The paper references work in the 90s, but the paper and the latest work,
is current.
Craig
>
>
What am I missing here? Is hydrogen not really necessary for this reaction?
Then why was it considered so important?
Craig
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. <hoyt-stea...@cox.net>
wrote:
> Add some BORAX to the water, I hear that's even better.
>
> -O
Bit of News for you...Steorn will conduct a series of LIVE interactive Webinars beginning on October 28th.The webinars are an introduction to their free energy technology Orbo Powercube.They will demo the tech, explain how the components work and field questions.Link to register for the FREE Live
Remember those guys who said they had developed a flashlight powered by Earth's magnetic field? Well, here's the next product apparently.http://freeenergy.news/news/the-rapidly-self-charging-adgex-tachyon-powerbank/
I think we could be seeing the first product hit the market by the end of the year - maybe a lot sooner.See one of my reports on this:http://freeenergy.news/steorn/pub-launch-for-steorns-orbo-powercube/Craig
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again:
From: Analog
, but there is no causal
link between the two. Free trade does not lead to mass surveillance,
wars, and riot squads. He is, rather, equating a philosophy based on
violence with a philosophy based on free trade, where no such
relationship can be shown to exist.
Craig
gold reserves from $20 / ounce to $35 / ounce.
The Federal Reserve created a lot of money in the 1920s and much of it
went into the stock market, driving prices to extraordinary levels,
which had not been seen before that period in time.
Craig
who want to see gold as money do so because they believe in a
decentralized, universal, stable, currency, something no central bank
can achieve.
Craig
Electric cars in the 90s were only built as a result of the California
mandate. There was no demand for them back then.
Now, with improved technology, and much higher gas prices, a lot of
people are starting to like the idea and the market is becoming viable.
Craig
, and his patent application is
rejected, then I think he would have a strong legal case if someone
tried to replicate it and distribute it.
Craig
The MFMP data is really compelling. As the temperature rises; as the
internal pressure drops, the difference between the fueled cell and the
control gets wider.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/15ODbN9Oq6Pjyp9A61hdX0-fBJIXBBKMk7Ei06PzTc-Q/htmlview?sle=true#gid=1291075296
Craig
On Sat
everything cheap.
Craig
Why concentrate upon a very special case instead of the more general
applications for these drives? Hovering is useful, but it is not going to
enable one to travel among the stars.
Hovering gives us flying cars.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:50 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes,
, 2015 at 11:35 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Craig Haynie's message of Sun, 10 May 2015 23:19:42 -0400:
Hi,
I'm suggesting that in theory no energy is required as long as there is no
movement. IOW he creates a force, but as long as that force doesn't act
over a
distance
of the theory paper). Whilst the EmDrive can provide lift to
counter gravity, (and is therefore not losing kinetic energy), auxiliary
propulsion is required to provide the kinetic energy to accelerate the
vehicle.
Craig
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:19 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Craig Haynie's
with the previous result.
So, I don't understand how any device could hover an object with the mass
of a tonne for less than a theoretical 48 kilowatts. Any thoughts on this
would be appreciated.
Craig Haynie ( Manchester, NH)
1 - 100 of 579 matches
Mail list logo