This is discouraging. What makes Mills special is that he:
1) Discovered something unusual.
2) Developed a theory to explain the phenomenon.
3) Spent 25 years working from his theory to develop his understanding
of this phenomenon.
It's because he was working from theory which made his progress
credible. He either really had discovered something, and was able to
exploit it, or he was a complete fraud, since if his theory is
worthless, then he could never have developed all of his work.
Now, if his theory can no longer explain the phenomenon, then this means
that he has either a) discovered ANOTHER amazing phenomenon, or b) has a
discredited theory which seriously makes me question anything he's done.
His theory has always had problems, and always had a lot of criticism. I
don't doubt there may be holes in it which need to be filled -- perhaps
a lot of holes -- but I am at a loss as to how he could have discovered
another amazing energy source without using theory.
Craig
On 06/17/2016 03:57 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
From the quote, that is a conclusion that is now coming out of BLP.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Craig Haynie
<cchayniepub...@gmail.com <mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Axil, are you saying that Mills' theory, which he has used to
develop this process, has now failed him and can no longer explain it?
Craig
On 06/17/2016 03:38 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
R, Mills has alway asserted that the energy that he sees in
his experiments were based on CHEMICAL processes which are
driven by the particular characteristics of the hydrino
theory. There always has been a correspondence between the
small amount of energy produced by LENR experiments and the
small amounts of energy produced by hydrinos.
In this latest SunCell experiment, R. Mills is seeing huge
quantities of excess power produced in these reactor
meltdowns, in the megawatt range. There is no way that such
huge amounts of power can be produced by chemical means. This
implies that the hydrino is no longer the cause of the excess
energy seen in these meltdowns. Something else is going on.
Mills must now explain where all this energy is coming from if
it cannot be produced by chemical reactions. X-rays are being
generated with energies far in excess of any electrical input
voltages. What produces these X-rays?
BLP states:
Proof of a new energy source is provided by two otherwise
inexplicable observations: (i) The formation of a high-energy
hydrogen plasma in the absence of any input electrical power,
the nonexistence of any energy releasing chemistry with this
fuel, and the further impossibility of known chemistry of this
high energy. (ii) The emission of soft X-ray radiation at a
voltage far less than that of the light energy produced and
the inability of any known chemistry to release such high energy.
