Ok,I was clued in about Barker patents and others, Rex research
[http://www.rexresearch.com/coldfusn/nukwast.htm#brown] reveal evidence for
acceleration of decay vs delay. I am interested now in what types of decay
are involved And how measured. I am ignoring Gamma type since we have so few
dead
Jones,
Thank you for the detailed reply, I have read it several
times and am still digesting all the material. Your comment regarding the
near field reactivity as a naked proton approaches the Casimir wall really
caught my attention. I think we are on the same page even though you
In reply to a blog comment
http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/blog/7200-hydrino-patent-based-catalyst-denie
d-while-later-patent-relativistic-hydrogen-based-casimir-cavity-granted.html
#comment-51584
Thomas to quote you,
Since then, I have made the argument that the Casimir effect is caused by
the
on Sat, 15 May 2010 11:54: Harvey Norris said
Can Time itself be distorted in a way other then how Einstein predicted this
by
Relativity?
Harvey, we are asking the same question although we might still technically
have to call it relativity. The difference is that Einstein only referred
What is simultaneous for the train will be seen by the tracks as a delay
between the sprayers. My guess is the marks will be spaced the normal
length of the train -space time can reshape for the train near luminal
speeds and you can accumulate time dilation for any paint particles
traveling
Jed Rothwell
On Wed, 12 May 2010 13:33 Jed Rothwell said
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
The entire palladium lattice can be considered a collection of cavities.
No, it is a lattice. A lattice is not the same as a cavity. A cavity is a
break in the lattice, in which D2 molecules can
OK, we are agreed that P1V1/T1 =P2V2/T2 even applies to state changes of gas
atoms. Normally Anything that effects the volume of the overall population
but here is where COE meets Casimir effect
Which allows monatomic gas to translate Freely with very little opposition
to fractional states, We
Or whatever happens when fusion occurs within a BEC. Do we know how these
behave? What does it mean to fuse within a BEC? (if they aren't separate,
how do they fuse, or, perhaps more to the point, how do they *not* fuse? How
tightly coupled will this BEC be to the confining palladium?
Often
Thanks Robin,
I stretched myself too thin and consequently the brain fart
missing the per sec. I did catch the need for added energy but was
wondering how it would perform in an environment of h1 and you answered that
also In confirming it is a Mills catalyst. My pet theory is
Robin,
I was trying to leverage the gas producing rate of interleaved
plates such as used in HHO kits vs the slow formation of separated H and O
electrodes in a Hoffman arrangement. In the HHO arrangement I can
accomplish this easily by placing my glass filter/reactor inline with a
torch
On Fri April 30 Jones Beene said [quote]Possibly, but if you are looking for
Casimir cavities, there are probably
far better choices from nature (or rather from altering nature) than mere
limestone.
A search for nanoporous calcium carbonate turns up many jewels:
Mixent said on Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:58:41 -0700
[snip] which BTW doesn't mention the Ca-48 reaction Ca-48 = Ti-48 + 4.27
MeV (Ca-48 is 0.18% of natural Ca)
which averages to 7.7 keV / atom of Ca. Which would make old concrete or
limestone a great fuel source, about 1000 times better than coal. ;)
Jed,
I agree that these effects are all related for the same reasons
you state and that Arata supplies
the most compelling evidence. Your argument regarding this being fushion or
chemical and your reply
to Mike Carrel 50 kW for how long? How much energy? From what mass of
fuel?
Am I correct in believing a near luminal basketball could pass through the
eye of a stationary needle?
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:22:45 Jones Beene said
[Quote]When the spin flips, a photon is always emitted or absorbed, and a
tiny
amount of heat is transferred. At high pressure, the flipping could happen
at rate measured in terahertz (blackbody kinetic rate) so even a tiny heat
difference (micro-eV)
Just so I understand what all the fuss is about.. Is it because he is
pushing neutron capture when he is supposed to be unbiased? I watched the
Youtube presentation and frankly I liked it. How often does neutron capture
occur normally? Does neutron capture get accelerated by catalytic action?
Abd,
Thanks- I kind of figured there was more to it than I was processing. I
asked about the normal rate of neutron capture because I thought it might
change with fractional hydrogen. Always the optimist I find myself looking
for the mechanism by which it could work. I really feel we already
Horrace,
I don't disagree with your assessment and it is no surprise the
Professor finds his own patented method the only likely candidate but there
are 2 things I gained from section C of his paper.
First I finally understand the term Haisch coined Casimir -Lamb shift
which they
on whether the concept of a hydrino is valid, but the physics behind
it is certainly different from the physics that supports our
concept./unquote
From: Francis X Roarty [mailto:froarty...@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 8:03 PM
To: 'a...@lomaxdesign.com'
Cc: 'vortex-l'
Subject: Re
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax said on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:53:48 -0700 It should be
possible to get protection on impossible devices. Perhaps some protection
from having filed with adequate description to build a device. Even if the
patent is not issued; later on, when someone tries to infringe, you'd have
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:22:07 Jones Beene wrote
Fran,
The large spheres are diatomic hydrogen when outside the cavity, but become
monatomic after apparent shrinkage from our perspective, due to time
dilation, then releasing the photon, is that correct?
To cover more actual experimental results, one
Horace,
They are discussing same on HSG presently.
Regards
Fran
http://forum.hydrino.org/viewtopic.php?p=6878sid=0ab0baf3ad879d779b8db39bc
9149330#p6878 Postby JohnEB
http://forum.hydrino.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofileu=148sid=0ab0baf3
ad879d779b8db39bc9149330 on March
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:12:16
[snip]I thought it was a well recognized fact that monatomic Hydrogen only
combines to
molecular Hydrogen in three body collisions? (I.e. not through emission of a
photon). That's why the Langmuir atomic Hydrogen torch
Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan said on Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:34:23 -0800
[snip] * * * POINT: THE FASTER MASS TRAVELS(Einstein/correct),the more
ENERGY-Mass it
gathers(because Protons/Atoms are 'Micro-Singularities' making the
entire-mass
flow a running composite singularity/worm hole/WHICH is the
http://www.byzipp.com/animaTime.htm
sim to follow later (actionscript is killing me)
Re:
http://forum.hydrino.org/viewtopic.php?f=5t=235sid=dd8499e03bf9df3620a17b
ea94a9e34cstart=50#p6745 Alternate Theory of Pycnodeuterium
http://forum.hydrino.org/viewtopic.php?p=6745sid=dd8499e03bf9df3620a17bea9
4a9e34c#p6745 Postby meulenberg
. I am pretty sure that the Sodium-Hydroxide processed Raney Nickel- the
stuff
. that is good to go, is pretty safe, especially since it is packed in a
liquid
. that limits oxidation and must actually be dried out to use.
. Actually, they treat a very fine powder. Of course for LPD, I
Wm,
I think it is a little more complicated than that although you are on the
right track. In my opinion The trick is vacuum flux are moving on the time
axis so from their perspective your box has 6 sides -they manifest while
traveling from the future side to the past side while the other 4 sides
WM,
The repulsive Casimir effect is a misnomer, If you read
the articles carefully you will discover there is a medium used to cause
this effect. The nanomaterial is still attracted but less so than the medium
which gets between the sphere and the plate - quite literally floating
Scott,
The EM drive link is
http://www.universetoday.com/2008/10/09/is-the-impossible-emdrive-possible/
[snip] Actually, the untreated powdered alloy is pyrophoric, but once it has
been
treated with sodium hydroxide, I believe it is much safer. It can be bought
in
this
hydrino
http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/blog/7200-hydrino-patent-based-catalyst-deni
ed-while-later-patent-relativistic-hydrogen-based-casimir-cavity-granted.htm
l patent based on catalyst denied while later patent for relativistic
hydrogen based on Casimir cavity granted
hydrino patent based on catalyst denied while later patent for relativistic
hydrogen based on Casimir cavity granted
http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/blog/7200-hydrino-patent-based-catalyst-denie
d-while-later-patent-relativistic-hydrogen-based-casimir-cavity-granted.html
After recent correspondence I realized a much simpler analogy without
invoking time dilation or anything more exotic than f/h. Strong Catalytic
action alone could Tear apart a f/h molecule if the confinement geometry is
selected to impede the high mobility of f/h molecules while f/h atoms are
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:15:43 -0800 Mike Carrell said
If you want an understanding of the Papp engine, **study** the work of
Randell Mills and the evolution of Balcklight Power. The idea of anengine
running off nolble gases seems absurd, but argon, helium and water vapor can
for a catalutic
34 matches
Mail list logo
