Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
ROGER ANDERTON wrote: It is not their constitutional right to censor. > It most certainly is their right! Facebook or the Washington Post cannot be forced to publish an editorial they disagree with. They can censor any opinion or letter they want. If the government were to force them to publish

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
AM ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > shouldn't be allowed to be above the law and suppress freedom of speech > Freedom of speech only applies to the government. The government cannot pass a law restricting freedom of speech. YouTube, the Washington Post, FOX News or the Scientific American can restrict

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
ROGER ANDERTON wrote: Well it has been free initially, next expectation -> initially it was not > censored, can you/we expect them not to eventually censor > YouTube never said it would not be censored. They said from the start they would not allow pornography, revenge or dangerous vids. It is

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
I revised the Video Introduction page to embed the video, and I told the reader there are no subtitles in the downloadable version but the scripts are below. https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1618

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
ROGER ANDERTON wrote: Not really new, its the same old trick everytime; its like how illegal > drugs are pushed -> the dealer gives you them free until you are hooked > then you have to pay; Youtube were giving a free service, now they are > looking for getting money from it. > Well, you can't

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
Oh. You learn something new every day. I see you can pay them to delete the ads for $12 a month, with YouTube Premium. This I did not know, because I am out of it. Far, far out of it. Light years away from it. - Jed On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:12 PM ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > Youtube has star

[Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

2021-09-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
Around July of this year, the number of people viewing my video fell. Recently I watched the video and discovered that YouTube is stuffing advertisements in front of it. I guess that is why fewer people are watching it. There does not seem to be a way to override this. The "monetization" option is

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jonathan Berry wrote: It is not marginal, look at Africa, the places where they give Ivermectin > routinely has basically no Covid death spikes, the places where they don't > have the familiar looking waves. > These effects are more easily explained by demographics (many young people) and by

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jonathan Berry wrote: Jed, You point me to a study where it was tested this way suitably, I > suspect it will have been highly flawed if that was the result. > I suspect you will say that any result you disagree with is flawed by definition. But you are missing my point. Even if we

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton wrote: If you are truly interested, there are currently 76 clinical studies either > on-going or completed for the efficacy of ivermectin on SARS-CoV-2. > 76 is a lot of studies! I think we can be confident that if it has any efficacy, that will be determined. A reliable,

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton wrote: > But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive >>> >> >> No. If that were true, it would show up in the double-blind tests. >> > > Many things work in vitro but not in the body, e.g.: > That's true too. It is important. But I was talking about a clinical double-blind test

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jonathan Berry wrote: > Why are they pushing an experimental that contains the harmful spike > protein that has little beneficial effect and obvious harm? > COVID itself, and the common cold, both produce a million times more of these spike proteins than the vaccine does. Yet the cold does

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jonathan Berry wrote: > But effectiveness is absolutely conclusive > No. If that were true, it would show up in the double-blind tests. Many of them have been done by proponents. None have shown more than a marginal effect, and they were probably mistakes. This is science. You have to use

Re: [Vo]:Scientific Papers sign of desperation among Big pharma

2021-09-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > We no longer need any Ivermectin studies as we have real data from > 1'000'000'000 people that now no longer worry CoV-19. > Leading Indian epidemiologists say there is no evidence that ivermectin had an effect in India. They were interviewed in the New York Times and

[Vo]:Bridging the Gaps: An Anthology on Nuclear Cold Fusion Kindle Edition

2021-08-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Bridging the Gaps: An Anthology on Nuclear Cold Fusion Kindle Edition by Randolph R. Davis Published 2021 https://www.amazon.com/Bridging-Gaps-Anthology-Nuclear-Fusion-ebook/dp/B097465MT5

[Vo]:NASA and LENR

2021-07-26 Thread Jed Rothwell
The FAA's top space official outlines progress — NASA does a deep dive on potential power sources for a moon base, including “cold fusion.” https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-space/2021/07/23/the-faas-top-space-official-outlines-progress-493703 Frontiers of Space Power and Energy

Re: [Vo]:Some ICCF-23 videos uploaded already

2021-06-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
This has been brought up to date every day. On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 5:41 PM Jed Rothwell wrote: > See: > > http://ikkem.com/iccf-23_oralab.php >

[Vo]:Some ICCF-23 videos uploaded already

2021-06-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: http://ikkem.com/iccf-23_oralab.php

[Vo]:Reminder: ICCF23 starts June 8 (or June 9)

2021-06-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
ICCF23 starts on June 8, 2021, or on June 9, depending on your time zone. The preliminary program is here: http://ikkem.com/iccf-23_program.php Registration is free, but you have to register to see the presentations.

Re: Dave Beaty Re: [Vo]:ufo report to be coming out in a month

2021-05-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Michael Foster wrote: > Everyone just assumes that these visitors must be from civilizations far > advanced from our own. That may or may not be true. > If they are actually visitors from other civilizations, they have to be far advanced. They cannot be from anywhere in the solar system. Our

Re: Dave Beaty Re: [Vo]:ufo report to be coming out in a month

2021-05-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: > I think there is no likelihood aliens would need help from us, and no > likelihood they crashed or their equipment failed. A technology capable of > crossing interstellar space with devices as large as this would be > "indistinguishable from magic" (Clarke) and it would be hundreds or

Re: Dave Beaty Re: [Vo]:ufo report to be coming out in a month

2021-05-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: In that case, the most likely thing ET would need to continue their mission > is replacement of advanced chips and electronics. To get these parts, > however, they might first need to intervene somehow in the normal process > of R on earth by influencing progress and directing

Re: [Vo]:nuclear salt water reactor for propulsion in space

2021-05-05 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: > Ed Storms worked on the conventional fission rockets shown in this video. > I asked him if he thinks this is plausible. > He does not think it is plausible, for reasons too complicated to describe briefly. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:nuclear salt water reactor for propulsion in space

2021-05-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
I like it! Ed Storms worked on the conventional fission rockets shown in this video. I asked him if he thinks this is plausible. The paper is linked from the video discussion, here: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.1990-2371

[Vo]:How Pfizer Makes Its Covid-19 Vaccine

2021-04-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here is a *fascinating* look at the Pfizer production lines. Amazing! It looks a lot like a top-quality experiment. Which it is. See: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/health/pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine.html This has both text and short, high resolution video portions. It shows close-ups

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Carbon monoxide alarm

2021-04-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
The furnace is in the crawlspace, so I don't know if a leak from the flu would come into the house. It sure would if the furnace were installed in a closet in the house. Anyway, they replaced the whole kit and caboodle. I prefer it that way. I now have faith in the CO alarm, but not too much

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Carbon monoxide alarm

2021-04-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: Did your old furnace have a closed combustion system with a separate > fresh air pipe and combustion gas exhaust? > They all do, as far as I know. I don't recall the model and it is now out the door. The new one is a Trane S8B1:

[Vo]:OFF TOPIC Carbon monoxide alarm

2021-04-06 Thread Jed Rothwell
I strongly recommend that readers equip their houses with alarms for smoke and carbon monoxide. A carbon monoxide alarm may have saved my life a few days ago. Some of the things it did surprised me, and made me think it was a false alarm, so let me describe what happened. If you ignore what you

Re: [Vo]:OT: Nissan e-POWER technology explained

2021-04-06 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: > There are no gas stations in the middle of nowhere either. Granted, gas > stations are much more prevalent than chargers. Also, when a gasoline car > runs out of fuel, you can park it somewhere, get a ride to a gas station, > bring back a gallon of fuel in a plastic tank, and refuel

Re: [Vo]:OT: Nissan e-POWER technology explained

2021-04-06 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton wrote: There's virtually no maintenance...just brakes and tires and very little of > the former. > The brakes do not wear down because they have regenerative braking. Prius brakes last a long time for the same reason.

Re: [Vo]:OT: Nissan e-POWER technology explained

2021-04-05 Thread Jed Rothwell
CB Sites wrote: It's interesting Jed, there is a 12V car battery in the back of the car > that is charged from the Li batteries, which is charged from the engine. > The 12V is used for the car electronics. I did see a youtube video of a > guy that used a 2000W 12V inverter for emerge

Re: [Vo]:OT: Nissan e-POWER technology explained

2021-04-05 Thread Jed Rothwell
CB Sites wrote: > When home, I plug it in with the 115V charger device that plugs into a > standard 3 prong outlet. Nothing special. It takes about 6-8 hrs for a > full charge. Most commutes for me are about 30miles so I never see the > gas engine. Last year my TOTAL gas consumption for

Re: [Vo]:OT: Nissan e-POWER technology explained

2021-04-05 Thread Jed Rothwell
AlanG wrote: I think a better question is how the Nissan is better than the Chevy Volt, > which was discontinued after 5 years for disappointing sales, possibly from > failing to meet efficiency expectations. > It has not been discontinued. It is still for sale:

[Vo]:Whether Cold Fusion or Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions, U.S. Navy Researchers Reopen Case

2021-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
News report: https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/energy/nuclear/cold-fusion-or-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-us-navy-researchers-reopen-case Whether Cold Fusion or Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions, U.S. Navy Researchers Reopen Case Spurred on by continued anomalous nuclear results, multiple labs now

Re: [Vo]:Many years later...

2021-02-26 Thread Jed Rothwell
Don't fret about it. We have thick skin in this business. Welcome back! On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:10 PM Kyle Mcallister wrote: > Hello again, Vortexians. > > It's been a long time, perhaps 10 years or so since I've been here. I > can't recall exactly, but that was another life. You'd be

Re: [Vo]:It Might Be Over This Spring

2021-02-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
Note that one of the NYT projections also shows April as the date herd immunity begins. Look at the graph with three choices labeled "CHOSE A SCENARIO." Select the third choice: Huge supply increase 5 million shots per day The text changes to: It’s a stretch, but if the pace increases to 5

Re: [Vo]:It Might Be Over This Spring

2021-02-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: Taking into account one thing and another, the WSJ and the NYT estimates > are not far apart. > WSJ predicts April, NYT predicts July. A 3-month difference is not gigantic given all the unknowns. For example, what percent of the population will it take for herd immunity to begin? The

Re: [Vo]:It Might Be Over This Spring

2021-02-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
Taking into account one thing and another, the WSJ and the NYT estimates are not far apart. Herd immunity is not an absolute condition, and it does not turn on all at once over a certain threshold. The gradations in orange color at the top of the NYT graph show that it emerges gradually.

Re: [Vo]:It Might Be Over This Spring

2021-02-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
The WSJ article is behind a paywall. I hope this doctor is right. Other estimates put herd immunity sometime around August. See: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/02/20/us/us-herd-immunity-covid.html (I think this NYT article is not behind the paywall.) On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:13 PM

[Vo]:Re: CMNS: Physics Today does not allow references to peer-reviewed cold fusion literature

2021-02-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
There is no getting through to people like the editors at Physics Today. I expect that even if everyone here were to write to them, they would reject every message. They think of themselves as fair, objective and open minded. Perhaps they are open minded about some subjects, but not cold fusion.

[Vo]:Physics Today does not allow references to peer-reviewed cold fusion literature

2021-02-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
the right kind of scientists to be doing the work. In neither case was it enough, at the time, simply to say the results weren’t replicated, even though that is how we describe it in retrospect." I posted the following response, which was removed. Jed Rothwell <https://disqus.com/by/disqu

Re: [VO]:Sobering Energy Stats

2021-02-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
U.S. wind generation sets new daily and hourly records at end of 2020 https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/wind-power/u-s-wind-generation-sets-new-daily-and-hourly-records-at-end-of-2020/ QUOTE: On April 10, 2019, daily electricity generation from wind turbines in the United States (excluding

Re: [Vo]:Updated Gordon, F. Lattice Energy Converter (LEC)

2021-01-30 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robin wrote: > >work function where metal ions are transported by well known chemical > >reactions through a liquid electrolyte in between the electrodes. > > Not always. There are "dry-cells" (not really very dry), and also cells > with a solid electrolyte. > > >has similarities with a

Re: [Vo]:Updated Gordon, F. Lattice Energy Converter (LEC)

2021-01-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
I asked Frank to address this issue of batteries. He posted a reply at LENR-Forum, as follows: https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6508-frank-gordon-s-lattice-energy-converter-lec-replicators-workshop/?postID=151256#post151256 With regard to the possibility that the LEC is a battery: A LEC

Re: [Vo]:Updated Gordon, F. Lattice Energy Converter (LEC)

2021-01-27 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robin wrote: > A potential of 0.1 V over a DVM with an input impedance of 10 MOhm is > readily produced by a chemical reaction for > several months. The power is only 1 nW. > It could easily be the result of two different metals. I.e. an unintended > battery. > Gordon does not think it is a

[Vo]:Updated Gordon, F. Lattice Energy Converter (LEC)

2021-01-24 Thread Jed Rothwell
I uploaded a new version of this paper: Gordon, F. and H.J. Whitehouse, *Lattice Energy Converter (LEC) (PowerPoint slides)*, in LENR Workshop in memory of Dr. M. Srinivasan. 2021: Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur. https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GordonFlatticeene.pdf I added the

Re: [Vo]:LENR workshop in memory of Dr. M. Srinivasan Tentative Schedule

2021-01-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: Jed— > > > > That site requires a google registration. > > > > Is there another way tro access the workshop papers? > Are you sure it does? I just reached it again using another browser after signing out, and in incognito mode. While

Re: [Vo]:LENR workshop in memory of Dr. M. Srinivasan Tentative Schedule

2021-01-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: Did you try the website they just opened? I don't think that requires a > Google registration. See: > > https://sites.google.com/view/lenr-workshop/home > I just accessed it "incognito" so it must not require any registration.

Re: [Vo]:LENR workshop in memory of Dr. M. Srinivasan Tentative Schedule

2021-01-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
I recommend this presentation: https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GordonFlatticeene.pdf This is in Acrobat format with a link to the YouTube video presentation with the voice-over. Acrobat format may be more convenient because you can search through it or click on the link to the Rout paper. The

Re: [Vo]:LENR workshop in memory of Dr. M. Srinivasan Tentative Schedule

2021-01-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 5:47 PM bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Is there a way to see papers without t registering via google? I AVIOPD > GOOGLE. I WOULD LIKE TO READ THE VARIOUS PAPERS. > Did you try the website they just opened? I don't think that requires a

Re: [Vo]:LENR workshop in memory of Dr. M. Srinivasan Tentative Schedule

2021-01-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here is the website: https://sites.google.com/view/lenr-workshop/home

Re: [Vo]:Data processing errors in the COVID-19 vaccination program

2021-01-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
Michael Foster wrote: This is serious stuff. In your opinion, Jed, is this something like an > artifact of the unimaginably complex operating systems and networks we now > have? > Not a bit. This is prosaic. This would have been easy to program, but the people in charge did not g

Re: [Vo]:LENR workshop in memory of Dr. M. Srinivasan Tentative Schedule

2021-01-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
Several presentations have now been uploaded to the upcoming LENR Workshop in Memory of Dr. M. Srinivasan. You don't have to wait for the Workshop. Some of the slide presentations have a voice-over so you get the whole presentation. Mine does, and so does Frank Gordon's, which is interesting.

[Vo]:Data processing errors in the COVID-19 vaccination program

2021-01-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
This is completely off topic, but I put a lot of thought into it, and I would like to share it. In the U.S., thousands more people will die because the vaccines already on hand are not being administered quickly. If the vaccination program had been properly organized, this could have been

[Vo]:LENR workshop in memory of Dr. M. Srinivasan Tentative Schedule

2021-01-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
I think this document can be read by anyone. Maybe not? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1n9Fce0UMU4ch23mvCJ9XYAy8Ac43V5Tt9EwDlm6hocU/edit# LENR workshop in memory of Dr. M. Srinivasan 22nd-24th Jan 2021 Tentative Schedule

[Vo]:A LENR workshop in memory of Dr M Srinivasan

2020-12-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
From: K P Rajeev Date: Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:19 PM Dear Dr Rothwell, I am Prof K P Rajeev of Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur and you probably remember me as the co-author of late Dr Srinivasan of the transmutation chapter in the recent "Cold Fusion" book published by Elsevier in

Re: [Vo]:Re: merry Christmas

2020-12-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: > The ingredients are listed here. I think they are liquid at room > temperature, not powder: > The lipid nanoparticles are similar to butter, according to one expert. I think butter is considered a solid at room temperature. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eK0C5tFHze8=emb_logo

Re: [Vo]:Re: merry Christmas

2020-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
JonesBeene wrote: > It is not clear if this category (~3 percent) is anything more than a > passing phenomenon > Other sources say the problems went away in one day or less. There have been no reports of longer-term problems. Other vaccines have stronger, more common effects, yet they are

Re: [Vo]:Re: merry Christmas

2020-12-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > Look at CDC presentation slide 6** column explained below: > > > https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf > > 3% were no longer able to work afterwards... > Only for one day. Such reactions are common with many

Re: [Vo]:Good news about the pandemic at last

2020-11-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
Michael Foster wrote: Yes, you are correct about the 6% figure. They merely stated that 6% of > cases that listed covid19 as the sole cause of death failed to list the > co-morbidities. > Correct. COVID-19 itself does not kill patients directly as often as it leaves them open to secondary

Re: [Vo]:Good news about the pandemic at last

2020-11-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
Michael Foster wrote: > The CDC itself has said only about 6% of reported mortality could reliably > be attributed to the virus. No, it did not say that. You have misunderstood. Please stop spreading such misinformation. When you take that into account, the common cold probably has a higher

[Vo]:PLOS Writing Center guide to writing and publishing papers

2020-11-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
Someone from PLOS sent me a form letter addressed to Dr. Rothwell, suggesting I visit their online guide to writing and publishing scientific papers. I do not know whether to take that as a compliment or an insult. I would like to think it means they are reading the JCMNS and other papers. Anyway,

[Vo]:Good news about the pandemic at last

2020-11-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
I realize this is off topic. And I expect everyone here has heard about it. But I thought you would like to see some quantitative information. Here is a note on temperatures. The second article says the Moderna vaccine can be kept at -20°C. The Pfizer vaccine has to be kept at -75°C during

[Vo]:CleanHME Meeting presentations

2020-10-26 Thread Jed Rothwell
CleanHME Meeting presentations: http://www.cleanhme.eu/?page_id=345

Re: [Vo]:Interstellar travel

2020-10-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
Okay, to summarize this discussion: A radar would not be able to detect particles such as grains of sand or small rocks. Therefore I suppose you need a powerful laser in the front of the spacecraft to heat them and break them into molecules or plasma. It would have to be turned on at all times

Re: [Vo]:Interstellar travel

2020-10-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robin wrote: > 5) Interstellar gas is not the only problem. A grain of sand or a pebble > would spell disaster. > You're gonna need a VERY high resolution radar and a laser.

Re: [Vo]:Interstellar travel

2020-10-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robin wrote: > A space ship traveling at half the speed of light would encounter these > molecules traveling in the opposite direction at > that velocity. Assuming that the kinetic energy of these particles is > calculated using 1/2 m*v^2 (it's actually more at > that speed), then the power

[Vo]:Zhang: short report about heat release with hydrogen and deuterium

2020-10-06 Thread Jed Rothwell
Zhang, H., Summary of abnormal heat release experiment of hydrogen flux vessel. 2020, LENR-CANR.org: Personal Communication https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ZhangHsummaryofa.pdf Abstract A container was designed based on the assumption that the abnormal exothermic phenomenon of hydrogen

Re: [Vo]:Status of CMNS website

2020-09-29 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robin wrote: In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:52:04 -0400: > Hi Jed, > [snip] > >> https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1495 > > The last entry for 2020 is actually from 2018. > I do not understand what you are saying. Which entry? The last one is

Re: [Vo]:Status of CMNS website

2020-09-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
H LV wrote: What is the status of the website for the Journal of Condensed Matter > Nuclear Science? > https://iscmns.org/CMNS/publications.htm > There are no publications listed after 2018. > Is there a new official site? > I do not know if this is official, but all issues are listed &

[Vo]:Steinetz paper sort of about cold fusion

2020-09-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
https://asiatimes.com/2020/09/nasa-lands-on-a-middle-path-to-nuclear-fusion/ NASA lands on a middle path to nuclear fusion Lattice confinement fusion breakthrough is in the promising Goldilocks zone between hot and cold fusion References: Novel nuclear reactions observed in

[Vo]:Brief letter describing Mizuno replication

2020-09-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here is a brief letter describing a replication of the Mizuno's experiment: https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RamaraoPgeneration.pdf Abstract Centre for Energy Research (CER) at Swami Vivekananda Yoga Anusandhana Samsthana (S-VYASA) which is a deemed-to-be University at Bangalore, India started

[Vo]:William Happer still at it

2020-09-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
William Happer, one of the Bush admin scientists who led the attack on cold fusion, is still fighting against science. Still at war with the facts! You can look him up in the Google customer search box at LENR-CANR.org. He was in the news again today. See:

[Vo]:JCMNS Vol. 33 uploaded

2020-08-26 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: Biberian, J.P., ed. *J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci.* Vol. 33. 2020. https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedzf.pdf This is the Proceedings of the ICCF 22 Conference, September 8–13, 2019, Assisi, Italy

Re: [Vo]:New book from Steve Krivit

2020-08-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
It was new to me! Amazon.com did not bring it to my attention previously. Maybe the Kindle version is new? - Jed

[Vo]:New book from Steve Krivit

2020-08-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: Fusion Fiasco, by Steve Krivit https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01N2TDWIY Blurb: Steven B. Krivit's *Explorations in Nuclear Research* three-book series (*Hacking the Atom, Fusion Fiasco, Lost History*) describes the emergence of a new field of science, one that bridges chemistry and

[Vo]:Review of the calorimetry of Fleischmann and Pons

2020-08-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
I uploaded the Japanese version of this paper Rothwell, J., Review of the calorimetry of Fleischmann and Pons (Japanese version). 2020, LENR-CANR.org. https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJreviewoftha.pdf I think Japanese readers will be interested in the discussion of the NHE starting on

Re: [Vo]:Useful information on masks

2020-08-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
H LV wrote: > When you think about it, I don`t think masks have ever been designed > explicitly to keep stuff in. > As far as I know masks have traditionally been designed to keep stuff out. > Keeping stuff in is a new concept. > I believe you are wrong about that. Surgical masks are worn to

[Vo]:Useful information on masks

2020-08-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
This is off-topic, but important. It turns out that cheap, throw-away "surgical mask, 3-layer" type masks work best. These are the ones you can buy anywhere nowadays. Office Depot sells them cheap. See this research article in Science:

[Vo]:Review of the calorimetry of Fleischmann and Pons

2020-08-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here is a paper I have been working on for some time. I have to do some other stuff, so I will upload it now and if people make suggestions I will improve it later on. I am translating it into Japanese. That will take another week or so. Rothwell, J., Review of the calorimetry of Fleischmann and

[Vo]:Two new papers by Mike Staker

2020-07-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Regarding the SAV phase. Staker, M.R., *A model and simulation of lattice vibrations in a superabundant vacancy phase of palladium–deuterium.* Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2020. *28* https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StakerMRamodelands.pdf Staker, M.R., *Estimating volume fractions of

[Vo]:Book by S. Szpak

2020-07-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here is a book by Stanislaw Szpak and Frank Gordon: Szpak, S. and F. Gordon, *Chemical Aspects of the Pd/nH-H2O System in Its Nuclear Active State*. 2011: LENR-CANR.org https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SzpakSchemicalas.pdf

Re: [Vo]:Robert Park died

2020-06-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
Dave Nagel wrote: > Bob Park was a member of my PhD committee at the University of Maryland. > He, Scott Chubb and I used to meet annually for lunch and a discussion of > cold fusion. > Perhaps I am stating the obvious but . . . This means Park was briefed on cold fusion at least once a year.

Re: [Vo]:Robert Park died

2020-06-26 Thread Jed Rothwell
Years ago, Dave Nagel sent me a photo showing himself, Robert Park and Scott Chubb. They were eating lunch together. A few days ago he wrote to me: Bob Park was a member of my PhD committee at the University of Maryland. He, Scott Chubb and I used to meet annually for lunch and a discussion of

[Vo]:Robert Park died

2020-06-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robert Park died April 29, 2020, age 89.

Re: [Vo]:what ever happened with this?

2020-06-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 1:13 PM Jed Rothwell > wrote: > > > Yup . . . So says Mr. Google. So said I! > > > > > https://e-catworld.com/2020/01/11/us-congress-charges-national-science-foundation-to-evaluate-lenr-research-and-make-recommendatio

Re: [Vo]:what ever happened with this?

2020-06-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
t; https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DOEreportofth.pdf > > Thanks for keeping the site up, Jed. > That is the 2004 report. There is a whole page devoted to that: https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=455 Last year someone recommended to the Congress look at this again. I think that is where th

Re: [Vo]:Verification of Mizuno experiment

2020-05-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
saying it. Are you trying to pick a fight about an undergraduate paper in Sapporo? It seems pretty good to me. If you don't like it, don't read it. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Verification of Mizuno experiment

2020-05-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: I am very surprised that Mizuno uses tritium. > He does not.

Re: [Vo]:UV-C Mask Direct Sterilization

2020-05-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
covering the masks with washable cotton outer masks, which they change between patients. Many people have volunteered to sew the masks, including my wife, who has dragooned me into tracing patterns and cutting threads. https://www.sewingmasksforatlantahospitals.com/ - Jed

Re: [Vo]:UV-C Mask Direct Sterilization

2020-05-15 Thread Jed Rothwell
This gadget produces UV light to filter air coming into a face mask. Mizuno invented something similar when he was working with glow discharge. He made a mask with very high voltage glow discharge screen. The amperage is so low it can run all day on a cell phone battery. It has slight blue glow in

[Vo]:Verification of Mizuno experiment

2020-05-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here is a short paper describing a verification of Mizuno's experiment at the Hokkaido University of Science. This document includes an English version and the original Japanese version. https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IgarashiJdevelopmen.pdf

[Vo]:JCMNS 32 uploaded

2020-05-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., Vol. 32, May 2020 is here: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedze.pdf There are only three papers in this volume.

Re: [Vo]:Better than N95

2020-04-05 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton wrote: You may have walked in the same space a beautiful woman just passed and > experienced her nice perfume. If she was shedding virus at that time you > are likely infected . . . > What if she is plain-looking? Am I safe?

Re: [Vo]:Masks

2020-03-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
In Atlanta, a large group of people organized over the weekend. They are sewing mask covers. Not the masks themselves, but covers needed to protect hospital grade masks so that the masks can be re-used. Normally, they are only used once, but hospitals are running out. All over the country,

Re: [Vo]:Chloroquine trials in New York

2020-03-24 Thread Jed Rothwell
Michael Foster wrote: > I'm happy to see that rare cooperation between Trump and Cuomo will see a > large scale "trial" of chloroquine and Zithromax, already known to work as > a treatment for covid19. I hope this will expose FDA/CDC as owned by the > pharmaceutical business, as exemplified by

[Vo]:Cuomo presentation on coronavirus

2020-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here is a SUPERB presentation by Gov. Cuomo of New York, on Sunday March 22. This is one of the best analyses of the situation I have seen. It is long, but I suggest you see the whole thing. It is one of the best examples of leadership since FDR. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlZeKTlpcqU Other

Re: [Vo]:Trial treatment starts today.

2020-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
New York begins trial treatments on Tuesday. QUOTE: New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Sunday that drug trials to test coronavirus treatments will begin in the state Tuesday, after President Trump on Thursday said the Food and Drug Administration approved one of the drugs for clinical trials, as New

Re: [Vo]:COVID19 Scenario Explorer

2020-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Sean True wrote: You can set the duration of the simulation in a calendar control: > Ah, thanks. Those numbers are grayed out so I thought they were disabled. You have to click on the lower number to extend into the future. (I am using my awkward laptop, which is hard to navigate with.) The

Re: [Vo]:COVID19 Scenario Explorer

2020-03-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Charles wrote: > 'We are a research group at the Biozentrum, University of Basel, > Switzerland . We are broadly > interested in evolution, ecology, and population genetics with a focus on > rapidly evolving pathogens such as HIV, influenza virus, or pathogenic

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >