to see how that affects the Delta
T/watt comparison?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Dr. Mitchell Swartz
mailto:m...@theworld.comm...@theworld.com wrote:
At 04:53 PM 7/4/2013, Jack Cole
mailto:jcol...@gmail.comjcol...@gmail.com wrote:
In my electrolysis research, I found that the wire leads
tonight, you should shortly have copies of the papers;
two are preprints from the upcoming Proc. ICCF-17.
Hope that helps. Good luck.
Mitchell Swartz
Under the right conditions,
even the smallest ripple can create a mighty wave.
Zensunni maxim
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Dr. Mitchell
.A partial copy, with the
relevant parts, of Dave Nagel's letter
to me affirming that he also told Rothwell that, is attached.
= beginning of email
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:32:33 -0500
To: Mitchell Swartz m...@theworld.com
From: David
being dissipated in the wire
leads. I had initially thought the wire was thick enough, but I
wasn't seeing as much heating as I expected. I switched to thicker
wire, and then I saw better heating.
That brings me to Jet Energy's (Mitchell Swartz) claims. His active
material has a much higher
At 09:34 PM 7/10/2013, you wrote:
Dr. Mitchell Swartz mailto:m...@theworld.comm...@theworld.com wrote:
== The science papers we have written improving calorimetry
and describing how to achieve CF/LANR have been censored by Jed Rothwell.
I, and we, have always given permission to have
.
Mitchell Swartz
*
===
Chad Schaffer pleads guilty in Mallove murder trial*
Greg Smith
http://www.norwichbulletin.com/news/x1364620539/Schaffer-accepts-plea-deal-in-Mallove-murder-trial#axzz1scKOQ8CV
NorwichBulletin.com
Dennis,
Indeed . And that would be controls.
It might be a minority view; several controls are needed.
He needs a metachronous 1 MW pulse for enough time
and energy for the system to reach the same temp and heat
deposited that the LANR system would expect to achieve
in the steady state,
Gerald Celentes Top Trends for 2011 Trends Journal
lists Cold fusion to be the greatest investment opportunity of the 21st
Century.
http://coldfusionnow.wordpress.com/2011/01/26/gerald-celente-cold-fusion-to-be-the-greatest-investment-opportunity-of-the-21rst-century/
More links and much
At 11:06 AM 1/16/2011, the disingenuous, censoring Jed Rothwell
wrote:
Mitchell Swartz
m...@theworld.com
wrote:
[several examples of Rothwell being inconsistent
and untruthful all deleted for
bandwidth]
At 10:25 AM 11/19/98 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Swartz: If yes, was it a vertical
controls.
Mitchell Swartz
At 12:42 PM 1/16/2011, you wrote:
Swartz,
its pretty clear whose 'ranting' here...
Shoo... you're wasting bandwidth
Interesting anniversary.
You had this same issue thrown back to you exactly
one year ago today.
Terry Blanton had it spot on.
== from Vortex 16 Jan 2010
At 01:37 PM 1/16/2011, Nick Palmer
ni...@wynterwood.co.uk wrote:
Mitchell
Swartz: I think your problem is that you think Jed's report on the
Patterson cell was presented by Jed as a scientific assesment of the
exact heat generated. If that had been so then all of your frequently
repeated
At 03:21 PM 1/16/2011, Jed Rothwell falsely wrote:
Mitchell Swartz
m...@theworld.com
wrote:
Jed Rothwell was exposed in this thread falsely purporting
that Dr. Arata and myself
posted to Wikipedia about him.
Oh for goodness sake, I meant other people at Wikipedia attack
me.
Nowhere does
in response to Rothwell's
unscientific
nonsense. No wonder he runs his censored site.
===
POTENTIAL FOR POSITIONAL VARIATION IN FLOW CALORIMETRIC SYSTEMS
Mitchell Swartz
http://world.std.com/~mica/posvar.html
ABSTRACT
Although many aspects of calorimeters have been
At 03:08 PM 1/15/2011, Rothwell wrote:
Mitchell Swartz
m...@theworld.com
wrote:
For those seriously interested, two papers explain WHY and HOW
Jed Rothwell erroneously measured his kilowatt levels of
pseudoexcess heat with Ni-beads using an improper vertical flow
calorimetric system
At 05:23 PM 1/15/2011, you wrote:
Mitchell Swartz
m...@theworld.com
wrote:
First, the setup WAS a flow calorimetric system.
Not the way I used it. I changed the configuration for my tests. I
diverted the flow into a cup.
It was being used as a flow calorimeter by Patterson et al
to Wikipedia on anything;
and would not waste a femtosecond on the egomaniac Rothwell.
I certainly doubt Dr. Arata has either.
Jed Rothwell projects, hallucinates, confabulates
and once again heralds his certifiable handicap.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
Arraignment in Mallove Murder
Both suspects accused in Dr. Mallove's 2004 Norwich murder case answered to
a judge.
Both are believed to have been Mallove's tenants and were forced to leave.
Schaffer -charged with felony murder and robbery
Foster - charged with accessory to murder, felony
Arrests made in Mallove Murder
4/1/10 - Rebecca Santillo
Norwich, Conn. (WTNH) - Two arrests have been made in a Norwich homicide
that has gone
unsolved for nearly six years. Eugene Mallove, 56, was found dead in the
driveway of his boyhood
Norwich home back
At 11:51 AM 2/28/2010, you wrote:
Hi Jed, many thanks for this, but aren't there many other ICCF
proceedings missing? According to your special collections page at
http://www.lenr-canr.org/Collections/Introduction.htm
you only have ICCF-10, ICCF-11 and ICCF-12 complete, and selected
papers of
At 08:20 AM 10/3/2009, you wrote:
I wrote: It strikes me as fairy easy to control for gravitational
thermal instabilities in flow calorimeters..
That should be: It strikes me as fairly easy to control for
gravitational thermal instabilities in flow calorimeters..
Fairies, sprites, elves,
posted my papers repeated to vortex and CMNS and anyone
who has requested them. Many times.
The disingenuity of Rothwell that they have been withheld for any of
Rothwell's fabricated convoluted reasons is brazen, and obviously
laughable.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
',
given that every other recipient had no problem with
CDs, with the paper receipts, with emails, with second
pdfs ... etc. etc.
Permission was not only given, but several times, including
implicitly by the very effort made to send the documents.
Have good day.
Mitchell Swartz
had
open cold fusion demonstrations in the USA at a
national meeting.
Rothwell's screwball behavior
does not help cold fusion's image. Never has.
Mitchell Swartz
At 06:58 PM 9/30/2009, Met Rothwell wrote:
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
wrote:
Extort money? It
iit a lie.
I never did this. Nor would I ever.
So, this time I will not be hearing from you or your attorney? That's a
relief. Maybe you should give back the money you extorted from
others.
If you do send
, and with
calibrations.
The potential errors from flow calorimetry arranged
vertical in Earth g-field are flow related.
They can potentially cause a large error, a false
positive amplification.
The error can be correctable, so why not just fix it?
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
At 09:26 PM 9/30/2009, Rothwell, proven disingenuous, wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Update: Dr. Swartz has posted the URL of one of his papers on
Vortex,
as of about an hour ago. I don't know if it's one of the papers
Jed was
considering uploading or not.
Rothwell: I have not
on that highly selected, therefore censored, list.
BTW, the DOE made quite reasonable
requests/complaints which Dr. Dash and I had
actually done.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
quite reasonable
requests/complaints which Dr. Dash and I had
actually done.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
At 01:09 PM 9/29/2009, you wrote:
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
wrote:
How ironic (or not)
that the two LANR/CF researchers
who actually had perfomed open demonstrations at ICCF10,
Dr. Dash and myself, did not have a single paper
on that highly selected, therefore censored, list.
Yes, it is censored
This is not a static process, but the success of
thunderstorm
electricity results from the kinetic ratio of two ongoing
process.
One suspects that the rate of formation of free charge in the
cloud,
caused by friction between water crystals pulling protons off of
one,
exceeds the rate of free
Group VIII
Metals
- Structure of Water, and Deuteron Transfer
Dr. Mitchell Swartz, JET Energy,
Incorporated
Deuteron and Palladium Flow in
Loading and Codeposition
- Solid State Physics of Loaded Palladium - Dr. Scott Chubb,
Infinite Energy
Coherent Scattering and D-Flow in
Pd1-xDx
Roles
.
Advanced registration is required.
Further details will be forthcoming.
If interested in contributing, please contact:
Dr. Mitchell Swartzm...@theworld.com
orcolloqu...@cherrytechnology.com
Theory, Quantum Electrodynamic Theory,
Metamaterial Issues, Optimal Operating Point Operation,
Tardive Thermal Power, LANR transmutation,
LANR experimental issues and problems,
Energy production and energy conversion,
Update on patents and IP issues.
Tentative Speakers:
Mitchell Swartz
Peter
At 12:38 AM 10/28/2008 +1100, Wesley Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jed, Another point you should consider including is that because America
has failed to follow thorough on its own discovery and fund the research;
other country's are also effected. Some countries have been actively
At 06:38 PM 10/25/2008 -0600, Edmund (Neutral potential) Stroms wrote:
The infrequent success in CF can be explained if the required and rare
catalyst is absent in most studies. This being the case, we need to
search for this catalyst.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is
. Mitchell Swartz - Excess Heat Measurements in Deuterated Palladium
Dr. Scott Chubb - Review of experimental presentations at ICCF13
(Sochi, Russia)
Dr. Larry Forsley - Gamma emissions from CR39 Films near
Codeposited Deuterated Palladium
Dr. Mitchell Swartz - Optimal
At 11:55 PM 7/21/2007 -0400, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dr. Mitchell Swartz wrote:
1) For example, even tonight, I observed that the papers of Dr. Ken
Shoulders
still are censored.
Rothwell:
Shoulders has never submitted a paper to me. As far as I know he has
never written one
. Mitchell Swartz
At 04:20 PM 7/21/2007 -0400, you wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
Let's pretend for a minute that both sides in this dispute are in good faith:
- Jed understandably prefers text because it allows indexing and searching.
- Mitchell understandably prefers raw scanned images because they are
more
At 04:20 PM 7/21/2007 -0400, disingenous Jed Rothwell wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
Let's pretend for a minute that both sides in this dispute are in good faith:
- Jed understandably prefers text because it allows indexing and searching.
- Mitchell understandably prefers raw scanned images
At 02:26 PM 7/20/2007 -0400, disingenous Jed Rothwell wrote:
Swartz I do not understand, except for his comments about flow
calorimetry, which are wrong.
Continuum electromechanics and engineering may be foreign to Jed Rothwell,
but they are not wrong.
Our papers demonstrated that
=
Subject: Storms/Rothwell censorship =
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004
Subject: Storms/Rothwell censorship
From: Eugene F. Mallove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mitchell Swartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mitch,
FYI -- this was a message that Rothwell posted to Vortex about a month ago:
At LENR-CANR.org we have
reactions
Dr. Mitchell Swartz - Excess Heat Measurements in
Deuterated Palladium
Dr. Scott Chubb - Review of experimental
presentations at ICCF13 (Sochi, Russia)
Dr. Melvin Miles - Calorimetry in Excess Heat
Measurements in Deuterated
presenters]
will have have
at least two presentations on calorimetry, and if there is more interest,
perhaps this problem and its solution will be briefly discussed then.
Hope that helps.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
At 03:25 PM 7/14/2007 -0400, you wrote:
Dr. Mitchell Swartz wrote:
The Patterson cell was set up deliberately in a vertical flow system
which created
large false postive levels of excess heat.
I don't think so. A couple of questions about this hypothesis:
Why did this artifact sometimes
wishes.
Mitchell Swartz
This is the tentative schedule of the August 2007 Cold Fusion Colloquium on
Lattice-Assisted Nuclear Reactions (LANR) The Science and Technology of
Deuterated Metals at MIT
Date: Saturday, August 18, 2007
of Lattice-Assisted Nuclear Reactions [cold
fusion, LENR]
Place: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Pre-registration required
Hosted by: Dr. Mitchell Swartz and Prof. Peter Hagelstein
Preliminary Tentative Lecture Schedule: 9:30 AM - 2:30 PM
Other
At 05:23 PM 4/24/2007 -0400, you wrote:
On 4/24/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This reminds me of the idiotic comment by Michael Crichton that Terry
Blanton quoted here in 2005:
I'm just trying to understand the mechanism. The albedo of the earth
reflects multispectrum light back
At 05:23 PM 4/24/2007 -0400, Terry wrote:
On 4/24/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This reminds me of the idiotic comment by Michael Crichton that Terry
Blanton quoted here in 2005:
I'm just trying to understand the mechanism. The albedo of the earth
reflects multispectrum light
At 02:24 AM 7/1/2006 -0400, you wrote:
Dear Vo.,
Who is Taleyarkhan and what is-are the work related to the person.
Can anyone provide a simple lay person note on the topic?
Further:
Can anyone provide a BBGB of the basic work or theory?
AND:
Can ANY Vo provide a
skills.
--
People have to acknowledge CF is real but we have no idea how or why
it works.
Regards,
Ed
Actually, It does not matter if people acknowledge CF, and most
importantly,
we have good ideas of how and why it works.
Dr. Mitchell
work, because cells
produce only a fraction of a watt. Larger cells have been made but they
are very dangerous because the reaction cannot be controlled. Higher
temperatures are also effective but dangerous.
Many many errors in a few sentences; most previously corrected.
Dr. Mitchell
Improve Understanding of Heat
after Death
Transactions, American Nuclear Society, vol. 93, ISSN 93 1-988, 891-892 (2005).
Hope that clarifies and helps, because the future of successful cold
fusion systems will be controlled by engineering.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
At 07:29 AM 5/29/2006 -0400, Walter Faxxon wrote:
Cold fusion advocates should put up or shut up.
Below I referenced the James Randi Educational Foundation One Million
Dollar Paranormal Challenge. Surely after 17 years of research there
should now be a way to produce an absolutely bulletproof
At 10:37 AM 5/29/2006 -0400, Walter Faxxon wrote:
Mitchell Swartz wrote:
Scientists and engineers should never lower themselves to
the level of a magician or trickster.
...etc...etc...etc...
Yay! I was right! I'm hearing excuses! Excuses just like the TV
psychics use!
Please consider
,
there will be
current flowing through resistor across the current source in the Norton
equivalent
causing it to be warmer.
FWIW, the resistor is merely heating from dissipation, and that is not
really calorimetry,
either, which would have required calibration.
Mitchell Swartz
Record Set for Hottest Temperature on Earth: 3.6 Billion Degrees in Lab
Scientists have produced superheated gas exceeding temperatures of 2
billion degrees Kelvin, or 3.6 billion degrees Fahrenheit. ...They don't
know how they did it.
At 03:42 PM 3/4/2006 -0800, you wrote:
FWIW:
There is a short blip on Hagelstein and CF in the March Issue of Discover
Magazine
Excerpt and link at the COLD FUSION TIMES web site.
http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html
), and business
development.
Perhaps those who did not actually attend either conference should
consider actually going to a US meeting
before purporting they (don't) know what is going on.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
=
Cold Fusion Timeshttp
publicly posted to spf and vortex.
first email from Mr. Coviello to Dr. Swartz thanking Dr. Swartz
for helping him by correcting errors in Coviello's article -
From: John Coviello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mitchell Swartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MIT Cold Fusion
At 06:02 AM 9/20/2005, [Johnny C. Johnny] Coviello wrote:
It is simply amazing that Dr. Mitchell Swartz should even mention the word
plagiarism. In his most recent issue of Cold Fusion Times he put a
story about the Cold Fusion Colloquium at MIT in May 2005 on the front
cover, written by me
At 01:00 PM 9/20/2005, Rothwell wrote:
Mitchell Swartz wrote:
Second, Rothwell was physically handed the papers at Dr. Mallove's funeral.
Rothwell: As I said, I could not read the CD-ROM, and I do not deal with
physical paper, unless the electronic copies have been lost.
First, Rothwell
At 03:31 PM 9/20/2005, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mitchell Swartz wrote:
In addition, note that Rothwell has also finally admitted that HE removed
the titles,
but he remains disingenuous about WHEN he removed the titles.
Rothwell: Yo: Mitch. Where does admit come from? It is my web site. Who
At 03:38 PM 9/20/2005, Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
I'm curious, Dr. Swartz.
If you succeed in your efforts to OFFICIALLY catch Jed in a net of his own
falsehoods what do you plan on doing next?
Going back to cold fusion science and research. That is HOW this began.
Jed's entrapment
At 10:33 PM 9/16/2005, Edmund Storms wrote:
Mitchell Swartz wrote:
At 04:13 PM 9/16/2005, Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now people exist on a spectrum from
true believer to pathological sceptic to
form a voting quorum. The most rewarding ones are those
At 10:53 AM 9/17/2005, Ed Storms wrote:
I have found it impossible to have a discussion with Dr. Swartz because no
matter what is said, he will not change his mind.
Edmund's projections again
Ed refused to observe the Optimal operating points which I pointed out to
him.
His own data
At 11:42 AM 9/17/2005, John Coviello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There you go Dr. Swartz, no more excuses. Send Jed your ICCF-10 paper and
he'll publish it. It would be convient to be able to download the Swartz
ICCF-10 paper from lenr-canr.org. A simple question to Dr. Swarts, is
this paper
At 01:34 PM 9/17/2005, Jed Rothwell protests a bit too much, and wrote:
Mitchell Swartz writes:
example at the (misnamed) LENR site - which
is a company.
Rothwell: No, it is not a company.
Swartz: Yes it is. [Webster's definition removed by Rothwell because
it disputes his nonsense
At 02:17 PM 9/17/2005, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mitchell Swartz writes:
The word was 'company'.
Rothwell: Ah, but it should have been squad (non-military) or
sodality (but not in the sense used by Roman Catholic Church).
Wrong. The sentence was posted to counteract your erroneous
attempted
.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or chance.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
Refs:
Swartz, M, Generality of Optimal Operating Point Behavior in Low Energy
Nuclear Systems, Journal of New Energy, 4, 2, 218-228 (1999);
Swartz, M, Optimal Operating Point Characteristics of Nickel Light Water
Experiments, Proceedings of ICCF-7 (1998
).
Coupled with additional theoretical advances made by both Scott and
Talbot Chubb, this goes
far in explaining the nuclear coupling to the lattice.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
Science: The creation of dilemmas by the solution of
mysteries. - Norma Cenva
to today.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
Fanaticism is always a sign of repressed doubts - Iblis
Ginjo
Cold Fusion Timeshttp://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html
The journal of the scientific aspects of loading isotopic
At 11:56 PM 9/13/2005, Ed Storms inaccurately pontificates:
Michael Foster wrote:
Is Ed Storms actually a Super Double Secret Dysinformation
Agent who has penetrated the white knights of Vortex-L?
...
Storms: This is not true, a proper person can buy heavy-water. The issue
is liability. D2O
At 10:09 AM 9/14/2005, Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Despite Storms' claim, it has gotten more difficult to obtain
heavy water.
Despite Storms' claim, compared to many things, D2O is NOT poisonous
in small amounts.
In small amounts, D2O is used in medical tests, medical
At 03:03 PM 9/14/2005, you wrote:
From: Steven Vincent Johnson:
From: Mitchell Swartz
This is a lengthy list of collected evidence to support what
I presume is your contention that Mr. Storms often doesn't
know what he's talking about. How much more of your finite
resources do you
At 06:41 PM 9/13/2005, you wrote:
From: Mitchell Swartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cold fusion is now at the engineering stage, well beyond the basic
research stage.
And as such, several devices and modifications of cold fusion can, and
will be, patented.
What is even more interesting
At 05:17 PM 9/13/2005, Edmund Storms wrote:
Once again I have no idea what Swartz is talking about. If CF is at the
engineering stage, I know of no evidence this is true.
Only those with narrow minds fail to see that the definition of Impossible
is 'Lack of imagination and incentive'.
for a larger picture of the front page and more
information].
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
=
Cold Fusion Timeshttp://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html
The journal of the scientific aspects
At 10:53 PM 7/24/2005, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Mitchell Swartz wrote:
Also, corroborating this, we have made electricity for years using
cold fusion systems [since before our
first report in Fusion Facts (Hal Fox, editor) a decade ago when a small
light bulb first turned on by CF
].
Mitchell Swartz
==
Update of Cold Fusion Times
http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html
also http://world.std.com/~mica/cftrev12-2.html
amount. Many cold fusion devices do this
including the calorimeter used by Mitchell Swartz.
Some many errors in a few sentences requires some clarification.
First, our multiring calorimeters are not the cold fusion devices --
which are Phusors.
Everyone at the misnamed LENR site seems to get
complained before his murder).]
So the verdict stage is over. CF works and MANY are working to develop
and integrate it. Serious work indeed.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
==
Update of Cold Fusion Times
http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html
also http
].
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
===
At 06:29 PM 7/21/2005, you wrote:
The National Geographic in the August issue has a good article on the
energy problem. They even mention cold fusion - A few scientists have
claimed
Update to the Cold Fusion Times (volume 12, number 2)
is up at http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html [click on pic for larger
pic].
Contents: The MIT 2005 Cold Fusion Colloquium with Tribute to Dr. Eugene
Mallove
FUSION ADVANCES
Cavitation/Ferroelectic Fusion
D-D Fusion in
.
Some pictures at http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html
(They will be up for a short while; courtesy of Dr. Goldbaum
and Cold Fusion Times. Reviews will be in the next issue.)
JET Thermal Products
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
PO Box 81135
: Saturday, 5/21/05
Final registration 8:00 AM Kodak Room 6-120 Massachusetts Institute
of Technology
8:30 AM - Noon Morning Science Program
Experimental Reports of Cold Fusion Systems
Mitchell Swartz - Introduction
David Nagel - Evidence That Cold Fusion Involves Nuclear
Great news!!
Because of the success of the program, the UPCOMING SYMPOSIUM on COLD
FUSION at MIT, Cambridge Massachusetts
The 2005 Cold Fusion and Clean Energy Colloquium
with Special Tribute to Dr. Eugene Mallove
now is lengthened in time from 8:30 AM to 6 PM.
The final program is at:
At 10:39 AM 5/6/2005, Jed Rothwell wrote:
[I sent this before but it did not come back to me. This version has a few
corrections]
Mitchell Swartz wrote:
There have been no LENR demos! Demos may not even be possible.
Utter nonsense. JET Thermal Products gave an open demonstration of a
robust
At 05:43 PM 5/2/2005, Rothwellwrote:
This field is dying, and I cannot think of any way to save it.
- Jed
Utter nonsense.
Cold fusion research and development is (and has been) very much alive.
Success in the field requires advanced calculus, metallurgy and engineering.
Much will be covered at
Mitchell Swartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
JET Thermal Products
PO Box 81135 Wellesley Hills, MA 02481
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
to cold fusion patent applications.
Many thanks to those who are contributing to this educational scientific
cornucopia.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
The 2005 Cold Fusion Colloquium
with Special Tribute to
Dr. Eugene Mallove, Cold Fusioneer, Investigator and MIT
UPCOMING SYMPOSIUM on COLD FUSION at MIT, Cambridge Massachusetts
The 2005 Cold Fusion Colloquium
Cold Fusion and other Clean Energy Investigations from the Edge of the
Envelope
with Special Tribute to Dr. Eugene Mallove, Cold Fusioneer, Investigator
and MIT Graduate
General Topics
Science
At 10:01 PM 4/11/2005, Akira Kawasaki wrote:
April 11, 2005
Vortex,
Has the discussion group that poplulated Vortex been moved? I am not too
much into, or interested in, biblical topics mixed into CF.
-ak-
The 2005 Cold Fusion Colloquium
Cold Fusion and other Clean Energy Investigations from
At 10:21 PM 4/8/2005, Mike Carrell wrote:
Vorts,
Peter Gluck is a veteran CF supporter who lives in Romania. He asked me to
forward the questions below for comment on vortex.
Mike Carrell
--
Dear Friends,
This was once a group dedicated to
Cold Fusion and perhaps
At 06:02 PM 1/27/2005, you wrote:
Dear Dr. Swartz,
In answer to my private e-mail inquiry about this matter,
Jed Rothwell said that he'd be happy to make your research papers
available on lenr-canr.org, but that he was unable to find the
files on your website, and that his CD drive could not
At 11:44 AM 1/27/2005, Edmund Storms wrote:
Dr. Swartz, if you have a problem with what Jed or I have done with your
papers, take it up with us personally. Do not waste the time of everyone
on Vortex. They can not solve your problem.
Ed:
First, Rothwell brought this up. He wasted
Physics Today appears to have come down heavy, and somewhat inaccurately,
on the DOE report.
Claims of cold fusion are no more convincing today than they were 15 years
ago.
That's the conclusion of the Department of Energy's fresh look at advances in
extracting energy from low-energy nuclear
with Lilly Rush or the CSI series,
but the tardive and inadequate response of three seasons does not herald an
efficiency
of which any competent community should be satisfied.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
===
1. Anyone with information about Mallove's death
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
