Dear Vorticians,
I just came across this reference to some new research showing
previously-undescribed electron spin-coupling modes that I thought folks
here might find interesting. I don't have access to the full article yet,
but I did find some related work by the first author.
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015
9:20 AM
FORTH is an interesting RPN (Reverse Polish Notation) programming language.
Quite primitive, but deceptively powerful once you get a handle of it.
I already liked RPN from using and programming my
I thought the spinsters in this crowd would find the following article
rather interesting:
http://phys.org/news/2015-08-magnon-phonon-magnetoelastic-magnetic-photoexci
tation.html
They describe anomalies involving interactions of spin-domain boundaries and
photonic energy.
Here is a relevant
Jack,
Fantastic! I’m really stoked to hear of your progress. I think your powder
recipe sounds very interesting, and I would love to know more about the details
of the reactants. It sounds like you’ve come up with a mixture which may
contain one or more key ingredients not yet identified
(Cross-posted from e-catworld )
Axil,
Although some aspects of this reaction may be occurring, I suspect that the
large crystal sizes for both the iron and lithium aluminum hydrate suggest that
this fuel does not have sufficiently dispersed nano-scale reactants, which this
article
There was some discussion last week about these reactions, based on
newly-released papers, on this thread:
“[Vo]:Is the E-Cat reaction a plasmon-driven instance of a
metastable innershell molecular state (MIMS) mediated neutron exchange?”
I agree that the reactions I am proposing are extremely unlikely to occur in
an unconstrained system, such as a gas or plasma in three-space.
However, you must consider that these reactions are occurring in the midst
of *intense* interactions driven by EMF, SPP, and phonon energies that are
produced from fusion reactions and others injected by megawatt beams used to
heat the plasma to fusion temperatures. New experiments are shedding light
on one of the major mechanisms by which fast ions can be ejected from
plasma.
-Bob
From: Robert Ellefson Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 2:25 PM
Occam's Razor is a tool used by enfeebled minds to construct paper houses out
of tree bark shavings.
Real thinkers use chain saws and portable lumber mills to build their houses.
-Bob
-Original Message-
From: Kevin O'Malley [mailto:kevmol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 26,
From: Roarty, Francis X Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 6:18 AM
are you implying this reaction can occur without gas loading? If your
theory
does require gas atoms what function do you assign them?
Dear Fran, Bob Cook, and vortex-l,
My interpretation of the evidence is that the
Oops, I see at least one significant typo in the reaction table.
The first line should read:
Li-7 + Ni-58 + Li-7 + stimulus - 2Li-6 + Ni-60 + sr-gammas
This is the first step of the enrichment cycle.
-Bob
-Original Message-
From: Robert Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 5:29 PM
Dear Vortex-L,
Stimulated by Jones Beene's thoughts on a coherent lasing system based on a
Dynamical Casimir Effect (DCE) from his postings earlier today, I hope to
encourage further discussion along these lines of thought.
In reference to the characteristic morphology of the nickel ash grain
Dear Vortex-l,
I found these papers from Young K. Bae, published recently in Physics
Letters A and Results in Physics, to be of tremendous interest and potential
relevance to the phenomena we are witnessing in the E-Cat and possibly other
LENR reactions.
(I note that these whole papers can be
then, I'll just presume this to be
artifact.
-Bob
From: Robert Ellefson
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 5:29 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Testing fuels without a reactor
Given the results of the SIMS analysis from the Lugano report,
particularly
as detailed in this posting:
http://www.mail-archive.com
McKubre’s point about the value of the implications of the input power step
response is very important, and I entirely agree. In terms of systems
analysis, when you have an input step function, the derivative of that input
then becomes an approximation of the Dirac delta function, otherwise
Given the results of the SIMS analysis from the Lugano report, particularly
as detailed in this posting:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg98596.html
I believe that it is possible to evaluate the nuclear activity of candidate
fuel samples simply by sputter-cleaning them as
Looking closely at figures 5-8 of appendix 3 of the Lugano report, I believe
we can see evidence for the evolution of a mass 69 species during
sputter-cleaning of the samples while undergoing ToF-SIMS analysis in a
scanning electron microscope.
Figure 5 provides what amounts to a control run
peak.
-Bob
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ellefson
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 11:37 AM
Looking closely at figures 5-8 of appendix 3 of the Lugano report, I
believe
we can see evidence for the evolution of a mass 69 species during
sputter-cleaning of the samples while undergoing
David,
I strongly disagree with the conclusions you have expressed regarding the
ash sample isotope fraction.
First, as I explain in this (rather-long-winded) mail from yesterday, the
ENTIRE ASH SAMPLE BULK was analyzed by ICP-MS as consisting of 99.3%
enriched Ni-62.
( see:
The surface analysis of ash residue using ToF-SIMS showed 98.7% Ni-62
enrichment, while the bulk ash contents were found to have 99.3% enriched
Ni-62. Similarly, the surface-layer enrichment of Li-6 is 92.1%, while the
bulk contains 57.5% Li-6.
If these figures are accurate, then there exists
.
Jones
From: Robert Ellefson
First, as I explain in this
(rather-long-winded) mail from yesterday, the ENTIRE ASH SAMPLE BULK was
analyzed by ICP-MS
pure sample - which would indicate one neutron
at a time? Surely you are not suggesting multi-body?
_
From: Robert Ellefson
Jones,
I
was faked by
commercially available enriched isotopes?
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Robert Ellefson vortex-h...@e2ke.com
mailto:vortex-h...@e2ke.com wrote:
Recall that the bulk results show 57% Li-6 enrichment, vs. 92% surface
enrichment. I believe the higher fraction of Li-6
On Thursday, October 09, 2014 10:45 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Robert Ellefson wrote:
Given that the ash sample was taken at an arbitrarily-defined time point ...
then I believe
this indicates that the reaction is a cyclic one, which decays to the
measured ash
I don’t consider this a crazy idea at all.
In fact, there is my nearly-identical conclusion from yesterday:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98021.html
-Bob
From: Robert Dorr [mailto:rod...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 10:31 AM
To:
One observation that I'm noting in reviewing the data is the remarkably
complete conversion of nickel isotopes to Ni68, (from 3.9% in the starting
fuel to 98.7% in the ash) and the corresponding nearly-complete transition
of lithium-6 from 8.6% fuel to 92.1% ash abundance ratios. Given that the
Er,
s/Ni68/Ni62/g
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ellefson [mailto:vortex-h...@e2ke.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 5:02 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Intermediate products of isotope shifting reaction appear to
be
absent
One observation that I'm
Is this a typo?
There is no Ni68.
Half life is less than 30 seconds
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ellefson
One observation that I'm noting in reviewing the data is the remarkably
complete conversion of nickel isotopes to Ni68,
My speculation has been that the elements not present in the ash but seen in
the fuel may be the result of evaporation and subsequent deposition outside
of the sampled ash volume, such as on the vessel walls, rather than being
subject to transmutation. However, this would not seem to account for
Good News!
In a google hangout that just occured, Vice President Al Gore
said that there have been VERY interesting developments
in cold fusion recently, and he used significant tonal inflection
to emphasize his point.
He also explained that the term LENR was preferred now,
indicating he is
it, clearly, he just didn't actually say it.
-Robert
From: Harry Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:29 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Al Gore is aware of recent LENR developments
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Robert Ellefson vortex-h
... at what point does this incessant (IMO) kind posting behavior
considered
a nuisance and hindrance to on-going Vortex discussions? Now, if Cude is
genuinely making a good contribution I'll have nothing more to say on
this matter. But it would be interesting to hear a consensus on how
From: Alan Fletcher
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Caveats to using SPICE for thermal analysis
David has been concentrating on the control aspects, I have been doing RC
modelling similar to that described in your very helpful paper.
I did a detailed mesh model of a
involved in SPICE thermal modeling, but I do recall a number of
warnings from experts about divergences, subtle and not.
Hope this helps,
Robert Ellefson
34 matches
Mail list logo
