on 31/8/08 8:10 pm, Nick Palmer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> < interested in recovering the old-energy because going up down
> escalators is the long term mission of a cell.
>
> A cell does "defy" entropy in the sense that it invests some
> energy in searching for new-energy inaddition to produc
Keen observation , Thomas
were we discussing the political parties or science? The boys at the Dime
Box Saloon have " keenly observed" that both the GOP and Dems have fond
intentions but the desired results just ain't gonna happen.
Why? because wez broke!
Richard
Thomas wrote,
Anyone who has
Quoting Nick Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Of course a cell does not defy entropy. It takes in a certain amount
of energy, uses that to reduce the entropy of the materials it takes
in to make what it "desires". The amount of increase of entropy
(disorder) caused by the use of the energy is large
<>
Nah, not really. The processes of the cell decreases it's own entropy
(increases it's "order") but at the expense of creating extra disorder
(increasing entropy) in the whole area around its operations. Let's just say
that after the cell has done its thing, its personal entropy/disorder has
tions, adroitly conforming to
"reforms" passed by Congress.
Mike Carrell
- Original Message - From: "Edmund Storms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
To:
Cc: "Edmund Storms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] DOM
- Original Message -
From: "Edmund Storms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: "Edmund Storms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] DOM Vote
Unfortunately, the personal qualities of the candidates or their
religious v
on 31/8/08 9:17 am, Nick Palmer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Of course a cell does not defy entropy. It takes in a certain amount of
> energy, uses that to reduce the entropy of the materials it takes in to make
> what it "desires". The amount of increase of entropy (disorder) caused by
> the use
Unfortunately, the personal qualities of the candidates or their
religious views are not important to our basic living standards. Bush
was chosen on the basis of such criteria and look what happened. If
the people who vote on the basis of religious values do not start
looking at the deepe
Of course a cell does not defy entropy. It takes in a certain amount of
energy, uses that to reduce the entropy of the materials it takes in to make
what it "desires". The amount of increase of entropy (disorder) caused by
the use of the energy is larger than the amount of decrease in entropy
(
on 31/8/08 1:57 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> As for the evolution matter, what we intelligent design advocates ask to the
> opportunity to present our case to students. To wit, the living cell is a
> production facility. The definition of a P F, is that it takes that with
Quoting Edmund Storms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Aug 29, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:57:30 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
I wonder how many people turned McCain down before Gov. Palin's name
came up? The ship is sinking with all a
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:24:11 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>Frankly, I have a higher opinion of the female voter. Only the most
>ignorant would vote for McClain just because his choice of vice
>president is a woman. Most intelligent women supported Hillary
>because s
On Aug 29, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:57:30
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
I wonder how many people turned McCain down before Gov. Palin's name
came up? The ship is sinking with all aboard.
Ed
Actually I thought it was a very
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:57:30 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>I wonder how many people turned McCain down before Gov. Palin's name
>came up? The ship is sinking with all aboard.
>
>Ed
Actually I thought it was a very shrewd choice. By choosing a woman he improves
his chance
Edmund Storms wrote:
> I wonder how many people turned McCain down before Gov. Palin's name came
> up? The ship is sinking with all aboard.
I do not think so. I would not count out McCain or the Republican
Party. I expect this will be a very close election.
Creationism is not a problem for the R
I wonder how many people turned McCain down before Gov. Palin's name
came up? The ship is sinking with all aboard.
Ed
On Aug 29, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
The republicans have sealed the dirty old man vote. Gov. Palin at
20:
And also the creationist vot
And they had the old man vote until BO picked Biden; so, now all they
have is the DOM (which is most :-).
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Jed Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>> The republicans have sealed the dirty old man vote. Gov. Palin at 20:
>
> And also the cr
Terry Blanton wrote:
> The republicans have sealed the dirty old man vote. Gov. Palin at 20:
And also the creationist vote, but they had that sewed up anyway. Gov.
Palin supports "teaching the controversy" in the public schools.
- Jed
The republicans have sealed the dirty old man vote. Gov. Palin at 20:
<>
19 matches
Mail list logo
