[Vo]:- no blank run without hydrogen to test the instruments and heat losses: Mary Yugo: Rich Murray 2011.10.29

2011-10-29 Thread Rich Murray
- no blank run without hydrogen to test the instruments and heat losses: Mary Yugo: Rich Murray 2011.10.29 er, I'm still a pragmatic skeptic re 470 KW Rossi claim... Rich Murray - no blank run without hydrogen to test the instruments and heat losses Other things to investigate: whether only a

RE: [Vo]:- no blank run without hydrogen to test the instruments and heat losses: Mary Yugo: Rich Murray 2011.10.29

2011-10-29 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
From Mr. Murray, ... er, I'm still a pragmatic skeptic re 470 KW Rossi claim... Hello Rich, Lately, I've noticed that you have repeatedly prefaced your posts with claims that not only are you a skeptic, but that you are a pragmatic skeptic. I keep wondering who you really are trying to

Re: [Vo]:- no blank run without hydrogen to test the instruments and heat losses: Mary Yugo: Rich Murray 2011.10.29

2011-10-29 Thread Jed Rothwell
Regarding the title of this thread, it is ridiculous. HVAC engineers do not do blank runs when they certify 1 MW boiler performance. That's not how they work. As I said, that is like expecting a bridge inspector to construct another bridge next to the one he is inspecting, in order to compare the

Re: [Vo]:- no blank run without hydrogen to test the instruments and heat losses: Mary Yugo: Rich Murray 2011.10.29

2011-10-29 Thread Rich Murray
Hi Steven Vincent Johnson, Yes, I use pragmatic skepticism to define my role in my own mind, namely, common sense applied to details that can be comprehended by a scientific layman, which since December, 1996 has been a successful strategy for finding flaws in CF research -- pathological skeptic