Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 1:56 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium From my side of a recent private discussion of Holmlid ... I thought some of it would add to this topic: From what I have seen of Miley's work, Miley does not believe

Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Bob Higgins wrote: RM forms from many atomic species, not just hydrogen isotopes. This RM is > NOT dense, and even sodium RM particles are detected in the Earth's upper > atmosphere, some 80 km high. > I'm not surprised. I would be

Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

be instructive relative to the D(1) phase. Such a calculation may be possible for a planar configuration. Bob Cook From: Bob Higgins Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 7:59 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium I would like to see more discussion of Holmlid's

Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

I was thinking of a way to do this calibration. If a electric arc was used to produce excitation of the Holmlid experiment rather than a laser, the EMF and electrons from the arc could be used as a benchmark for time of arrival of x-rays and high energy electrons at the detector. A run with the

RE: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

Bob, Let’s face it: the only thing which is going to validate Holmlid is replication by an independent third party. This replication could happen in pieces on many fronts, starting with testing for muons - but it must be done. Holmlid seems to have an arguably valid response to most

Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

The great hangup on the replication of the Holmlid experiment is the time it takes the SPPs to become fully charged with energy. It takes weeks of laser stimulation. This delay might be greatly shortened through the use of an electric arc as a way to pump energy into the SPPs. For example, in

[Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

I would like to see more discussion of Holmlid's evidence for existence of the ultra-dense deuterium D(0). >From my reading, I understand the evidence for Rydberg Matter (RM) particles, and it is strong. This evidence is based on rotational spectroscopy of clouds of RM particles - the

Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

https://www.mpq.mpg.de/5020726/0720a_Rydberg_blockade.pdf Rydberg blockase is the quantum mechanical mechism whereby on typre of rydberg matter forses it state onto another type of matter. Potassium can force hydrogen in the rydberg matter state through entanglement. This is why a alkali metal

Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

>From my side of a recent private discussion of Holmlid ... I thought some of it would add to this topic: >From what I have seen of Miley's work, Miley does not believe the ultra-dense form of hydrogen is something that forms on a surface or can exist in the air. He thinks it is a form that

Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

Jones, Even if true that H(-1) exists as a superfluid/RTSC (and Winterberg says that the ultra-dense form only occurs with deuterium), then it is highly likely that it would be a type II superconductor, like all of the superconductors above about 40K. The type II superconductors pin a magnetic

RE: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

From: Bob Higgins * Even if true that H(-1) exists as a superfluid/RTSC (and Winterberg says that the ultra-dense form only occurs with deuterium), then it is highly likely that it would be a type II superconductor, like all of the superconductors above about 40K. The type II

RE: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

Of interest… In a 2014 paper, Holmlid says: “Ultra-dense hydrogen H(-1) is a quantum material and the first material which is superfluid and superconductive at room temperature. This has been shown in detail for the deuterium form D(-1).” Comment: As a RTSC, the dense material H(-1)

Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

..@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Nov 5, 2015 6:39 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium Jones, Even if true that H(-1) exists as a superfluid/RTSC (and Winterberg says that the ultra-dense form only occurs with deuterium), then it is highly

Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

t induced current > balances out the incoming field. > > Dave > > > > -Original Message- > From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Thu, Nov 5, 2015 7:59 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense

Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

m: Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Nov 5, 2015 6:39 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium Jones, Even if true that H(-1) exists as a superfluid/RTSC (and Winterberg says that the ultra-dense form only occurs wi

Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium

> From: Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Thu, Nov 5, 2015 6:39 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]: Evidence for ultra-dense deuterium > > Jones, > > Even if true that H(-1) exists as a superfluid/RTSC (and Winterberg says >