Jones be fair on people (as we all must be) conversions on the Road to
Damascus (St Paul, sh.t not a good analogy) don't happen in infinitesimal
time due to finite processes in brains.
Like I said, research, like a pop song needs a catchy hook because people
won't drop everything quickly when
Remi,
RC: The educated would say, Ah we know Dr Messian's work we've been awaiting
this symphony. See
what I'm getting at?
... not exactly, but I love love music analogies, and will return to this one
in a future posting.
RC: Now: Preferentially hydrogen (and all the other stuff) should
Remi sez:
...
Preferentially hydrogen (and all the other stuff) should have dropped to the
ground state long ago.
Which ground state?
So why are we all excited? (if you excuse the pun)
Don't pull my finger on a cold wintry day after I've walked across the carpet.
Why isn't everything
- Original Message -
From: Remi Cornwall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 8:26 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Mills' recapitalisation of energy levels
Rename this thread.
Very easy to email and be snappy.
Sorry Jones, I just don't believe you can drop
, October 30, 2008 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Mills' recapitalisation of energy levels
Remi,
RC: The educated would say, Ah we know Dr Messian's work we've been
awaiting this symphony. See
what I'm getting at?
... not exactly, but I love love music analogies, and will return to this
one
I accept that a lot of stuff goes by under the radar. We are pattern
recognition machines and isn't bloody odd that when you buy a car suddenly
you keep seeing the same car on the road, in the same colour!
But when our Neural nets get programmed to the wrong reason it stays stuck
to the wrong
Mike Carrell wrote:
... The ground state is
simply the relaxed state in a vacuum, neither ionized nor catalyzed.
Mills' discovery is that the fractional state can be reached by
selective catalysis under special conditions.
I have a Very Dumb Question here.
Is there a simple, concise
changed. How, why?
-Original Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2008 21:12
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Mills' recapitalisation of energy levels
Mike Carrell wrote:
... The ground state is
simply the relaxed state in a vacuum
Remi, Stephen:
RC: Also Jones, Steven, there's a nice quick proof in Feynman III about
the size of atoms where he uses the Uncertainty Principle in a 1/r well.
Since the charges are the same, to get any lower must mean that 'h' has
changed. How, why?
The World According to Mills:
The
Mike Carrell wrote:
... The ground state is
simply the relaxed state in a vacuum, neither ionized nor catalyzed.
Mills' discovery is that the fractional state can be reached by
selective catalysis under special conditions.
From Stephen Lawrence:
I have a Very Dumb Question here.
Is there
: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2008 21:37
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Mills' recapitalisation of energy levels
Remi, Stephen:
RC: Also Jones, Steven, there's a nice quick proof in Feynman III about
the size of atoms where he uses the Uncertainty Principle
I give another example of howlers I've seen where people then go and run off
on a wild goose chase with faulty underlying assumptions:
#1 A man builds some kind of trolled with two rotating arms which swing
around in synchrony. He tries it on ice and sees that is moves around. He
puts it on a
Remi,
Most of the problem you are having with this is that for Mills,electrons are
not infinitesimal points nor probability waves surrounding infinitesimal point
particles.
To quote the introductory material on HSG: electrons are spinning 2D electric
and magnetic flux surfaces
will get him.
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2008 23:23
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Mills' recapitalisation of energy levels
Remi,
Most of the problem you are having with this is that for Mills,electrons are
not infinitesimal
at that point.
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2008 23:23
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Mills' recapitalisation of energy levels
Remi,
Most of the problem you are having with this is that for Mills,electrons are
not infinitesimal
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Carrell wrote:
... The ground state is
simply the relaxed state in a vacuum, neither ionized nor catalyzed.
Mills' discovery is that the fractional state can be reached by
selective catalysis under special
I UNSUBSCRIBE TO THIS.
SCIENCE NOT SCIENCE FICTION.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2008 23:56
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Mills' recapitalisation of energy levels
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence
17 matches
Mail list logo
