Re: [Vo]:A bit more, from Hiddink...

2009-06-21 Thread Michel Jullian
2009/6/21 mix...@bigpond.com: In reply to  Michel Jullian's message of Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:33:26 +0200: Hi, [snip] PPS I still don't see how a plasma can support charge on its surface, anyone can enlighten me on this? [snip] That's the one thing that doesn't surprise me in the least. Surely,

Re: [Vo]:A bit more, from Hiddink...

2009-06-21 Thread mixent
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:08:15 +0200: Hi, [snip] Assuming for a moment the plasma was actually holding excess electrons, why wouldn't they just fly to the inside of the glass envelope, which is of course positively charged, and remain stuck on that dielectric?

Re: [Vo]:A bit more, from Hiddink...

2009-06-21 Thread John Berry
It's not so much seeing a reason for it to occur as i tend not to either as much as there is evidence that it DOES in fact occur when the conditions are met. On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:08:15 +0200: Hi,

Re: [Vo]:A bit more, from Hiddink...

2009-06-20 Thread Michel Jullian
The newspaper story is probably real, whether it is related to his invention is another question :) Do ask for a demonstration of a lightning strike on demand out of blue sky before investing more time or money in this scheme. BTW, if you want to learn more about capacitors, VDGs etc, I remember

Re: [Vo]:A bit more, from Hiddink...

2009-06-20 Thread John Berry
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.comwrote: The newspaper story is probably real, whether it is related to his invention is another question :) Do ask for a demonstration of a lightning strike on demand out of blue sky before investing more time or money in this

Re: [Vo]:A bit more, from Hiddink...

2009-06-20 Thread mixent
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:33:26 +0200: Hi, [snip] PPS I still don't see how a plasma can support charge on its surface, anyone can enlighten me on this? [snip] That's the one thing that doesn't surprise me in the least. Surely, it just acts like any other

Re: [Vo]:A bit more, from Hiddink...

2009-06-19 Thread Michel Jullian
Looks like a load of BS to me. Ask him to demonstrate his on-demand lightning strike routine to you, but don't hold your breath until he does :) Removal of the outside sphere in a spherical capacitor is not complicated BTW, just do it by bits. Only beware it takes work (energy) to pull the

Re: [Vo]:A bit more, from Hiddink...

2009-06-19 Thread John Berry
Note: I replied to this initially believing I was replying to a list I joined for the Gray conversion tube, so it's slanted in that direction. On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.comwrote: Looks like a load of BS to me. Ask him to demonstrate his on-demand

[Vo]:A bit more, from Hiddink...

2009-06-16 Thread John Berry
The invention is based on Faraday's problem: Two concentric metal spheres do not touch and form a capcitor C. That one is charged up to a potential V. Then the outside sphere is removed. The remaining sphere is a 1-terminal Capacitor c. The potential on that sphere is momentarily C/c x V. It is