Some thoughts:
It is rather clear, when there are leaks on a brandnew prototype system,
that is operated under 50% load and under eased conditions (open doors),
then the leaks could be repaired but under real full load conditions the
problems can (and probably will) occur again.
This problem
Peter Heckert wrote:
Under industrial conditions and full load it would overheat, leak
again, or the electric would fail after the first leak and steam
inside. No normal customer would want to buy this.
You are correct that this is a prototype, not a finished industrial
product. That is
Am 07.11.2011 23:19, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Granted, you might want to install it at an actual site to observe
performance under real-world conditions. You would use extensive
instrumentation. The real purpose would be to find out how to
mass-produce similar machines.
If the self
Btw, here is an image of the 850 kW heating system for the
Frauenkirche (a big cathedral) in Dresden:
http://www.ib-breiden.de/wp-content/myfotos/frauenkirche-dresden/14_Dresden_04.jpg
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
If the self destruction mechanism is inside, they cannot do this.
I doubt there is a self-destruct mechanism. However, if there is one, the
company that bought the 1 MW reactor now has over 100 individual cells to
work with. After experts open up to
The main reason any customer at this stage is buying the E-Cat 1MW
plant is to reverse engineer it and/or determine its viability.
However, each initial sale (13 now?) probably includes some strict
non-disclosure or anti-reverse engineering clauses. So Rossi is
probably selling a number to
There seems to be a lot of question about the actual heat released by Rossi's 1
MW system. Can we assume that it releases at least the minimum power
calculated at approximately 60 kilowatts? Even this relatively small amount of
heat would be quite noticeable by the standards that are being
7 matches
Mail list logo
