On Sep 22, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
Some questions for you and other self-appointed experts here:
This remark seems to have some emotional content.
Darn right it does. I am annoyed.
DO you know of any requirement for anyone here on vortex-l to be
Hi Jed,
On Sep 22, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
However, experts skilled in the art have said that Galantini's
methods are correct.
Did Galantini know whats inside the tower?
Did these experts know whats inside?
Did the experts get true and complete detail informations? Did they
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
However, experts skilled in the art have said that Galantini's methods are
correct.
Did Galantini know whats inside the tower?
Did these experts know whats inside?
They say they looked inside it. They saw nothing unexpected or unusual.
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
People who tell it like it is look sophomoric, in my opinion. People who
are dismissive run the risk of being themselves dismissed. It is better to
leave some room to retreat in case it turns out you are wrong.
What is so bad about being wrong.
Am 23.09.2011 23:29, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de
wrote:
However, experts skilled in the art have said that
Galantini's methods are correct.
Did Galantini know whats inside the tower?
Did these
Jed sez:
Here is an interesting treatise on being wrong:
http://www.amazon.com/Being-Wrong-Adventures-Margin-Error/dp/0061176044
It seems to be human nature to want to be right about what it is that
we chose to pontificate on. Unfortunately, arriving at certain
opinions seems to be one of
Jed Rothwell wrote: » In the first test, Galantini used a Delta Ohm
monitor to measure the relative humidity of the steam. This is a model
HD37AB1347 IAQ with a high temperature HP474AC SICRAM sensor. See:
http://www.deltaohm.com/ver2010/uk/st_airQ.php?str=HD37AB1347
The brochure and the
- Original Nachricht
Von: Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 22.09.2011 14:32
Betreff: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
Jed Rothwell wrote: » In the first test, Galantini used a Delta Ohm
monitor to measure the relative
peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Now what happens, when an inventor without deep knowledge and experience
constructs a steam device, makes it unaccessible and then lets unexperienced
scientist measure the steam?
Most scientists expect that devices that they use are properly constructed and
work
- Original Nachricht
Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 22.09.2011 15:53
Betreff: Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Now what happens, when an inventor without deep knowledge
...@arcor.de wrote:
- Original Nachricht
Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 22.09.2011 15:53
Betreff: Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Now what happens, when an inventor without deep knowledge
On Sep 22, 2011, at 5:53 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Now what happens, when an inventor without deep knowledge and
experience constructs a steam device, makes it unaccessible and
then lets unexperienced scientist measure the steam?
Most scientists expect that
On Sep 22, 2011, at 6:24 AM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
- Original Nachricht
Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 22.09.2011 15:53
Betreff: Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote
quality/ecc from a RH reading. I challenge you. Nobody do it. ISO standard
is to condensate the steam.
From: Jouni Valkonen
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:45 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
Peter, in order to measure
, September 22, 2011 4:45 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
Peter, in order to measure the enthalpy you need to know the mass flow of
steam. This is not known therefore humidity sensor gives only the amount of
liquid water in suspension
Who knows enough about sound velocity in various quality steam?
- Original Message -
From: Jouni Valkonen
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: About measurement of steam with Galantini probe
Mattia, you can also measure
Horace Heffner wrote:
Some questions for you and other self-appointed experts here:
This remark seems to have some emotional content.
Darn right it does. I am annoyed.
DO you know of any requirement for anyone here on vortex-l to be an
expert to comment?
Not to comment. I have no
17 matches
Mail list logo
