Good eye, Nigel.
... almost calls for an abbott and costello shtick ;-)
Nigel Dyer wrote:
At this point I perhaps ouught to point out my own article in Nature
Genetics. If you have access to the full article you will find it
says that a Nature Genetics paper a year earlier is substantially
At this point I perhaps ouught to point out my own article in Nature
Genetics. If you have access to the full article you will find it says
that a Nature Genetics paper a year earlier is substantially flawed
because they had based their conclusions on what is in fact an artefact
in the data.
"The Impostor Cell Line That Set Back Breast Cancer Research
It’s but one example of a major problem in cancer science."
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2017/04/the_impostor_cell_line_that_set_back_breast_cancer_research.html
A reader comment:
"If people knew what
3 matches
Mail list logo
