On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
...There is precedent for this. In 1917, the United States wanted to begin
large-scale mass production of aircraft for World War I. The industry was
hamstrung by patent fights especially by the original patent which had
The government in US does not exist. it is a puppet of business, and this
is a concept that in Europe we had to learn to fight. But it is hard to
import.
US Government is a vehicle to make business run nicely.
In europe a big change is in process, but not event to the quite coherent
system of US.
I think it is likely that the intellectual property rights for cold fusion
will soon result in a gigantic legal brawl with countless lawsuits. I
suppose that powerful interests may line up behind Piantelli to sue Rossi,
and vice versa, with everyone suing Defkalion. A lawsuit frenzy should not
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 16:01 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Someone here suggested that the best solution to this problem would be
for governments to throw a large pile of money that everyone involved
in the initial development of cold fusion. I think that would probably
be a good idea. I hope
Here are some notes on the outcome. I though Uncle Sam purchased the
patents, as originally planned. Not so, according to: The American
aviation experience: a history By Tim Brady
There was a tangle of 130 patents, all essential to aviation.
On July 24, 1917 Congress appropriated $640 million
Due to the international nature of these patents, what do you predict today?
Would LENR be coopted by the IAEA or UN? Would there be a declaration of energy
as a human right, and thus richer countries subsidizing the energy needs of
poorer nations? Or would $ for new energy sources be pried
Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 16:01 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Someone here suggested that the best solution to this problem would be
for governments to throw a large pile of money that everyone involved
in the initial development of cold fusion. I
Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
Due to the international nature of these patents, what do you predict today?
I know little about patents. My only prediction is that the people who
deserve a patent for the basic invention of cold fusion will not get one.
Cold fusion is
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 16:34 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 16:01 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Someone here suggested that the best solution to this
problem would be
for governments to
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Fleischmann is not working on anything. He is old and suffering from a fatal
disease. He got nothing for his efforts in cold fusion. Neither did any of
the other pioneers. They are mostly old or dead. All they got was
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is Stanley Pons?
He is living quietly in France. I have not heard from him in years.
- Jed
Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
But you're not proposing a solution within a moral framework. You're
advocating that people take money from those who may not want to give
it . . .
In that case it should come from a temporary tax on the sale of cold fusion
devices. A royalty, in
A tax on cold fusion devices?
The last thing we need is another tax!
Our government wastes billions of dollars as it is.
They could save billions by ending hot fusion research, and bringing our troops
home from around the world.
The ITER needs to be abolished.
I think what we need to do is convince the world that the E-Cat works, and then
promote a peaceful uprising of the people to force the patent office to grand
Rossi's patents.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday,
I don't agree with the government using tax dollars to pay cold fusion
inventors.
In my opinion, the government needs to be forced (peacefully) to grant Rossi's
patent.
When the government tries to fix a problem they helped create, 9 out of 10
times they make it worse.
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't agree with the government using tax dollars to pay cold fusion
inventors.
In my opinion, the government needs to be forced (peacefully) to grant
Rossi's patent.
As I said, having the government grant a patent is functionally equivalent
to
the need to merge the patent like it has been for plane seems reasonable.
the notion of taxing cold fusion is classic for IP or any business. Windows
is a tax on PC...
state or private is a polemic detail.
the CF inventors could merge their patents to accelerate the developpement
of
17 matches
Mail list logo
