This one looks interesting:
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/116853-mits-photonic-crystals-lead-towards-a-nuclear-reactor-in-every-gadget
Ron
--On Friday, February 03, 2012 9:02 AM -0800 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
wrote:
It is possible that somewhere down the road, a cross-over
-Original Message-
From: Ron Wormus
This one looks interesting:
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/116853-mits-photonic-crystals-lead-toward
s-a-nuclear-reactor-in-every-gadget
And it is extremely thin ... 3M notwithstanding
How does this sound E-Cat on a chip ?
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
How does this sound E-Cat on a chip ?
About as bad as eCat on a Hot, Thin Proof.
T
It is possible that somewhere down the road, a cross-over technology from a
completely different field (like information technology) may be needed to
take Ni-H to the required level of true on demand repeatability - over
many months. To wit, something like this:
I have been wondering about this as well.
Experiments using such films with different dimensions of etched squares
would be a good way of quantifying the way that the process depends on
dimensions, which would in turn help us understand what exatcly is going on.
Trying to get repeatable data
The fervor with which W-L adherence advocate that theory is appropriate for
a theory that has been strongly inferred experimentally against the array
of competing theories.
However, I see no such strong inference in evidence.
Assuming nanotech can fabricate structures at the 15nm feature size,
W-L theory is already dead in the water for Ni-H for two reasons:
1)There is no neutron activation, which could not be avoided if the
theory was valid
2)The technology of ultra low temperature neutrons is well know and
bears no resemblance to the invented species: ultra low momentum
It might well be that there are multiple reactions possible in the very
broad concept of cold fusion. It is my current humble opinion that it is a
mistake to try to cover all the instances of cold fusion with only one
theory.
One theory that might explain what is causing transmutation of elements
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
One theory that might explain what is causing transmutation of elements in
an electric arc of a Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann reactor
There is no electric arc in this reactor.
- Jed
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:47:43 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
The fervor with which W-L adherence advocate that theory is appropriate for
a theory that has been strongly inferred experimentally against the array
of competing theories.
However, I see no such strong inference in
...what is happening inside ...the ovaries of a chicken.
http://www.rexresearch.com/goldfein/goldfein.htm
??
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cross-over technology
It might well
I am jumping the gun a bit by posting some older background information on
the interplay between particle size and another variable ... one that can be
called roughness, structure, or specifically fractal structure.
The gentleman who brought this to my attention is not yet a vortex
subscriber,
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
in the context of this article
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1110/1110.1919v1.pdf
It's very annoying when they don't give the titles of their references. It
helps determine why they pursue the idea they are
Jones:
Just adding to the 'clues'... this from my posting Dec.17, 2011.
Look for phi-ratios in the numbers...
-Mark
=
Golden ratio hints at hidden atomic symmetry
Jan. 7, 2010
Courtesy Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres and World Science
By tuning the system the
14 matches
Mail list logo
