the emissivity was used, it was not the blackbody equation but is not that
the greybody equation (correct term?) ?
anyway what have to be the sensitivity error to explain the apparent COP ?
naively I assume that the emissivity during the calibration have to be much
much higher than assumed and
A calibration curve will bend down. It never bends up.
this mean that temperature grow less than the power ?
this mean that when you increase the power, and if temperature grows much
more that before, something anomalous is happening ?
Either excess heat, or some external blanket effect
: Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
A calibration curve will bend down. It never bends up.
this mean that temperature grow less than the power ?
this mean that when you increase the power, and if temperature grows much more
that before, something anomalous is happening ?
Either excess
To: Vortex List vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Oct 15, 2014 12:59 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat : Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
A calibration curve will bend down. It never bends up.
this mean that temperature grow less than the power ?
this mean that when you increase the power
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
A calibration curve will bend down. It never bends up.
this mean that temperature grow less than the power ?
Right.
this mean that when you increase the power, and if temperature grows much
more that before, something anomalous is happening ?
is
generating a major amount of power during the test.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Oct 15, 2014 3:19 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat : Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
I agree David. You can verify
Message-
From: Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
To: Vortex List vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Oct 15, 2014 12:59 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat : Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
A calibration curve will bend down. It never bends up.
this mean that temperature grow less than
for what they
actually were able to accomplish.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Oct 16, 2014 12:18 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat : Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
You might say I am splitting
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:43 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It would be a miracle to find that the temperature exactly matched what is
expected according to the Stephan-Boltzman equation.
I get that the preconditions for the Stephan-Boltzman equation were not
met, technically,
Hi
Following Mickael McKubre critics, I posted a question for the testers but
some here may answer with the public data
- assuming the convection factor is maybe badly represented
(underestimated for the dummy, over represented for the active) because the
dummy was tested at lower
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
- is there a simple way , with minimal assumption, to be sure that the
COP1
Look at the color. If it is dull red, it may be around 750°C which is
where you would expect it to be in a straight line extrapolation
calibration up to 800 W. If it
[mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 1:10 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-cat : Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com mailto:alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
* is there a simple way , with minimal assumption
: Minimum COP assuming worst mistakes possible
Hi
Following Mickael McKubre critics, I posted a question for the testers but some
here may answer with the public data
assuming the convection factor is maybe badly represented (underestimated for
the dummy, over represented for the active
13 matches
Mail list logo
