From Steven Krivit:
Any or all of us could take responsibility in helping to
maintain the effectiveness and integrity of the list.
I was not acutely aware that RELIGION and POLITICS were
inappropriate subjects here until this recent flare-up. I,
of course, thought they were OT, but
3 lists, that would just be unmanageable.Better is a rule of thumb, politics
should be allowed as long as it is strictly on topic politics that isn't
causing a problem, otherwise as with any other off topic subject it ought to
go to B.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:42 AM, OrionWorks
In reply to John Berry's message of Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:50:57 +1200:
Hi,
[snip]
3 lists, that would just be unmanageable.
Not necessarily. You can set the filter rules in your email client to send them
both to the same folder, and you wouldn't notice the difference. When you click
on reply it
Any or all of us could take responsibility in helping to maintain the
effectiveness and integrity of the list.
I was not acutely aware that RELIGION and POLITICS were inappropriate
subjects here until this recent flare-up. I, of course, thought they were
OT, but tolerated.
Now if the word
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Steven
Krivitstev...@newenergytimes.com wrote:
(I presume that threads about energy politics are
acceptable.)
Rothwell might disagree.
Terry
Agreed.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Steven Krivit
stev...@newenergytimes.comwrote:
Any or all of us could take responsibility in helping to maintain the
effectiveness and integrity of the list.
I was not acutely aware that RELIGION and POLITICS were inappropriate
subjects here until
6 matches
Mail list logo
