In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:43:26 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
By the way, fusion of protons with transuranic elements is very unlikely.
But if somehow a proton(s) got inside a super heavy nucleus, fission of the
new transmuted element would almost certainly happen
This is why Rossi uses nickel enriched in Ni62 and Ni64 because these
isotopes of nickel are the richest in excess neutrons within their nuclei.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:45 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:43:26 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
By the
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:57:36 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
What if you could
take something like uranium-238, which is relatively abundant, add
sufficient neutrons to it and then let it alpha and beta decay to
uranium-235?
Since any amount of U235 created would be small,
I don’t believe that neutrons are involved in the Rossi reaction. The best
indication now is that two PROTONS gently tunnel their way into a heavy
nucleus.
Next, a truism of bomb physics: isotopes with even mass numbers cannot be
used for a bomb. The mass number of U238 is 238. This is even.
By the way, fusion of protons with transuranic elements is very unlikely.
But if somehow a proton(s) got inside a super heavy nucleus, fission of the
new transmuted element would almost certainly happen instantaneously.
Such a fission reaction would be 20 time more energetic per incident
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
LENR just made petroleum obsolete. Then, currencies will be Nickel-based?
Or what?
bitcoin :)
It makes sense actually since bitcoin relies on wasting lots of now
unlimited energy.
Rob
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Then, currencies will be Nickel-based?
Well, we certainly can't make them hydrogen-based since anyone could
print money using electrolysis. ;-)
T
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:29:56
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
In addition, if currencies are based on the petro$, then that's going to
collapse like a tons of bricks when the financial industry realizes that
LENR just made petroleum obsolete. Then, currencies will
At last a theme where I can contribute, being an economist. :-)
Money today is Fiat money. There is no correlation between the dollar and
the oil. Oil has its price on dollar, not the other way around.
Currencies have their value based on several things, amongst which:
government credibility,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Sure, the US went off the gold standard decades ago (a mistake in my
opinion), but where does money get invested when currencies weaken…
precious metals. You do realize that we’re not just talking
be surprised if some
Vorts argue some of the points with you! We are an opinionated bunch.
J
-Mark
From: Bruno Santos [mailto:besantos1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 5:06 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR G Silver Currency
At last a theme where I can
I really don't think there is any direct connection between precious metals and
modern currencies.
Last I heard: Today's Currencies are based on the price of oil in $USD since a
large part of the World's Oil Supply is only traded in terms of $USD aka the
Petrodollar
Has anything definitively
I had a similar thought after I pressed send. Oh well.
I'm not an economist, but I think today's currencies are all fiat
currencies now (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_money). But some
countries still keep bullion around (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bullion_Depository),
?
Or what?
-m
From: Wm. Scott Smith [mailto:scott...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 1:21 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:LENR G Silver Currency
I really don't think there is any direct connection between precious metals
and modern currencies.
Last I heard: Today's
14 matches
Mail list logo