It is all about the way it is written, a patent examination based on LENR
application alone might or might have been rejected, but by including it in
a list alongside more mainstream applications, and concentrating on
material processing side they have found a way to get it through without as
much
I will ask David French what he thinks about this patent.
- Jed
Courtesy of LENR Forum - Follow links at -
http://www.lenrforum.eu/viewtopic.php?t=569p=2283
U.S. Patent No. US 8,227,020 July 24, 2012
ABSTRACT:
Techniques to form dislocation cores along an interface of a multilayer thin
film structure are described. The loading and/or deloading of
http://www.google.com/patents?id=WhIgAgAAEBAJpg=PA1lpg=PA1dq=%22Low+Energy+Nuclear+Reaction%22source=blots=Xuf1yRH2vBsig=142QFcoB_2WmhjeCiLVn9AuUGlUhl=ensa=Xei=qEROUKH4JsjSrQHKmIGoBwved=0CD4Q6AEwBQgoback=.gde_4132340_member_161859049#v=onepageqf=false
Isn't this sort of big deal? Not so much
Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
Isn't this sort of big deal? Not so much because of what the patent
covers, but because the USPTO actually granted it? Claim 11, for
example, specifically mentions charged particles and x-rays.
Yes, it is a big deal. I don't know what to make of it. Perhaps the P.O.
This should give Rossi much more confidence to show his invention... if it
was not for his totally confusing writing.
2012/9/12 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
Isn't this sort of big deal? Not so much because of what the patent
covers, but because the USPTO actually
6 matches
Mail list logo
