Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-21 Thread Jack Cole
Yes, if they put the whole thing in a calorimeter, they could measure the input power at the wall. I could be convinced by that kind of a setup. On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 4:18 PM Jones Beene wrote: > Good point, they would have been smart to place everything in a large > calorimeter box like the

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-21 Thread Jones Beene
Good point, they would have been smart to place everything in a large calorimeter box like the one Earth-tech designed. Why not? MOAC Overview - Earth Tech | | | | | | | | | | | MOAC Overview - Earth Tech | | | Jed Rothwell wrote: > If the waveform generator itself

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: > No meter or measurement can change that underlying situation, so the > discussion about accurate meters could be premature. > > From there on, everything is supposition. We can probably agree that if > anyone were to meter the power going into say a three pulse generator

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-21 Thread Jack Cole
There can be non-malicious reasons for not reporting that data as Jones notes. I would add self-deception to that list, which I think is likely in this case. Everyone close to the matter believes Godes couldn't have made a mistake on the input power measurement. While understandable, it is

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-21 Thread Jones Beene
To be fair, the pulse creation of Godes (as well as all of the other Dardik spin-off techniques for superwaves) would be expected to be extremely lossy, especially if one tries to superimpose waves from multiple signal generators, all of which carry their own losses. No meter or measurement

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-21 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: A clamp meter does KVA - and power factor correction (but not spell > checking :-) > To clarify, you are saying that a simple $20 wattmeter might not be accurate in this case, and a $200 clamp-on meter is better. Right? You could use both, I suppose. The input power to the

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-21 Thread Brian Ahern
The failure to measure, record and discuss wall power baseline measurements is the hallmark f a fraudulent effort. From: Terry Blanton Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2019 3:09 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast On Fri, Jan 18, 2019

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-20 Thread Terry Blanton
Hmmm. On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 3:33 PM Jones Beene wrote: > A clamp meter does KVA - and power factor correction (but not spell > checking :-) > > > >

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-20 Thread Jones Beene
A clamp meter does KVA - and power factor correction (but not spell checking :-) https://www.amazon.com/presion-Intelligent-Digital-correction-multimeter/dp/B073TVGCMQ/ | | | | $199.00 | | | | | | | High presion 3 phase Intelligent TRMS Digital clamp Meter power factor c...

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-20 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 6:59 PM Jones Beene wrote: > > Thereforw to answer your question specifically, anyone can buy a simple AC > wattmeter from Amazon for 20 bucks to do the job of ascertaining real input > power from the grid. It is beyond belief to suggest that this was not done. > Most of

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-18 Thread Jones Beene
bobcook wrote: > You say it is easy to measure pulsed power at the wall of the Godes reactor > and suggest the measurements were accomplished, but covered up... You should > suggest a method to do this “easy” measurement. Bob, Apparently my main underlying assumption - which is apparently

RE: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-18 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Friday, January 18, 2019 6:54:07 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast Jack, You are right-on about the input power having never been measured (or at least not reported) at the wall... which situation is all the more problematic since the input power is the one key f

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-18 Thread Jones Beene
Addendum: what is specifrically involved in a generalized "superwave" mechanism? The answer probably involves "energy localization" as a first step in a two step process. There are two kinds of energy localization, one operating at the nano-scale and one at the astro-scale. Obviously we are

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-18 Thread Jones Beene
Jack, You are right-on about the input power having never been measured (or at least not reported) at the wall... which situation is all the more problematic since the input power is the one key feature - the defining feature of Godes' technique and "Q-pulse" IP, just as with all the other

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-18 Thread Jack Cole
At one time, I had high hopes for Godes. The more I followed him, it became more evident that he and everyone else were enamored with his skills and credentials as an EE. Neither he, nor others, are skeptical enough of his results to figure out what he has done wrong. It probably wouldn't be

Re: [Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-17 Thread Esa Ruoho
Hi Jed, did you also listen to the previous podcast episode, which was released 4 days ago, where Ruby Carat was interviewing Dr. Edmund Storms? "2019/01/13 e019 Edmund Storms, Nuclear chemist with Kiva Labs and former Los Alamos National Laboratory rocket scientist. There, his work involved basic

[Vo]:Robert Godes podcast

2019-01-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: https://coldfusionnow.org/cfnpodcast/ I was disappointed in this presentation. I think it is misguided. Godes' business strategy makes no sense. He makes absurd assertions such as: he must produce a finished product, and he has to reach a manufacturing level where fewer than 1% of the