Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

...@gmail.com> To: "vortex-l" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 8:08:15 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer Henry W. Johnson is a lawyer just hiding the actual customer by being nominated president of the shell company that is owned by a British Company. Not u

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

Henry W. Johnson is a lawyer just hiding the actual customer by being nominated president of the shell company that is owned by a British Company. Not unlike the Panama Papers business. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > I see now that Free Energy Scams

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

I see now that Free Energy Scams has connected Henry W. Johnson to Leonardo Corp [1]: Leonardo 03-03-2014 — ANNUAL REPORT There were two major changes in this filing: • Andrea Rossi became CEO. • Henry W. Johnson became President. I do not know how to substantiate this detail. Eric [1]

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

gt; are now listed as inactive. >>> >>> Including : >>> >>> >>> https://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Miami-Beach/leonardo-corporation/66632333.aspx >>> >>> Johnson President, Rossi CEO >>> >>> >>> https://www.c

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

a/Miami-Beach/refc-real-estate-corp/137192381.aspx >> >> Johnson President, Rossi CEO >> ------ >> *From: *"Eric Walker" <eric.wal...@gmail.com> >> *To: *"vortex-l" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> *Sent: *Wednesd

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

-Beach/refc-real-estate-corp/137192381.aspx > > Johnson President, Rossi CEO > -- > *From: *"Eric Walker" <eric.wal...@gmail.com> > *To: *"vortex-l" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent: *Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:18:22 PM > *Subje

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

President, Rossi CEO https://www.corporationwiki.com/Florida/Miami-Beach/refc-real-estate-corp/137192381.aspx Johnson President, Rossi CEO From: "Eric Walker" <eric.wal...@gmail.com> To: "vortex-l" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 8:18:22 PM Su

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

Interestingly, that looks like a normal business park: https://goo.gl/V4AOLX I noticed this registration information for JM Chemical Products in Boca Raton: https://www.statelog.com/j-m-chemical-products-inc-boca-raton-fl The registration took place in July 2014. According to the lawsuit, IH

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

"‘The attached photo has been made in our factory in Miami, Florida, and is related to the plant “E-Cat the New Fire” manufactured by Leonardo Corporation to supply thermal energy’" From 2015: http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/05/05/new-image-of-the-e-cat-plant-on-trademark-application/ Craig

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

They do have an office at 7900 Glades Rd., Boca Raton, FL. The building is definitely large enough to use a 1MW plant. Robert Dorr WA7ZQR At 07:48 PM 4/6/2016, you wrote: Robert Dorr <rod...@comcast.net> wrote: Â It could be their business office and they have

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

Robert Dorr wrote: > It could be their business office and they have another building/warehouse > at a different location. > Good point. However, I looked them up in various places and this is the only address listed. They are categorized as chemical distributors. I expect

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

It is interesting to note that address is right next door to a Pepsi beverage plant. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > One of the legal documents lists Rossi's customer: > > >

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

It could be their business office and they have another building/warehouse at a different location. Robert Dorr WA7ZQR At 07:32 PM 4/6/2016, you wrote: One of the legal documents lists Rossi's customer:

[Vo]:Rossi's customer

One of the legal documents lists Rossi's customer: http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0001.2.pdf p. 25 JM Chemical Products 7861 NW 46th St, Doral, FL 33166 Just offhand, it does not look like the kind of building that

[Vo]:Rossi's customer

I have no idea who this customer might be. I do not like to guess, speculate or read the tea leaves when I have no information, but I believe it is unlikely that a major corporation is involved. I say this for the following reasons: Several large corporations and institutions such as Georgia Tech

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

At such a great scale The Oct. 28 Test is a contradiction in terms- it has to be at least the 3 days test starting on Oct. 28 No company having elementary idea of engineering would accept a short test for such a Behemoth, there are necessary hours to make all the 52 Fat-Cats functional, then they

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

you know peter,since youre always so negative about rossi and now you say theres no customer, i#m going to be overtly positive and guess its Apple. i hope these two messages cancel eachother out. On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote: At such a great scale The

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

My two cents: I don't doubt most of Jed's assessments and the subsequent concerns he has voiced concerning Rossi's approach. Some of the issues that have made this so frustrating for most of us has been the fact that (one) we really don't know what's going on, and (two) who is this allegedly

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

Thank you. Esa for your attention to my message. The truth is that I have lost two friends for thinking thta the Rossi E-cat gives some excess heat. I don't like his strategy, his experimental methods, I very strongly dislike The idea of combining 156 cores in the setup thta will be tested

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

A couple of people have written to me to say that this is a test reactor so you would not need a permit for it. I doubt that. In the US you are not allowed to install a 1 MW conventional boiler without a license, and you are not allowed to operate it without a permit. I do not think they would

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

Damn the measuring instruments, full speed ahead! Those instruments tell sometimes nasty things. On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: A couple of people have written to me to say that this is a test reactor so you would not need a permit for it. I doubt

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

The test has already began, if you count inspecting the machine as part of the test: http://ecatnews.com/?p=1095 2011/10/27 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com Damn the measuring instruments, full speed ahead! Those instruments tell sometimes nasty things. On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:09 PM,

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

There is one perspective that us believers in cold fusion might not understand or not consider operative in the minds of the naysayers. They think that Cold fusion is simply lot of non-sense and that Rossi is just another wacko who is just configured a Robe Goldberg Machine of pipes that mean

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

Daniel Rocha wrote: The test has already began, if you count inspecting the machine as part of the test: http://ecatnews.com/?p=1095 That's good. It should have begun weeks ago, but that's good. When I predicted that the instrumentation would be inadequate, I meant that would be the case

[Vo]:Rossi's customer

Just an update that I have had no responses from the 3 senior GE Press people I emailed yesterday. I had asked them if they could comment on whether GE had any involvement with Andrea Rossi or his eCat technology.CraigFree Energy Truth

[Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:27 AM To: vortex-l Subject: [Vo]:Rossi's customer There has been a rumor floated that the US Navy is Rossi's customer in this week's upcoming E-Cat trial. This rumor is entirely believable. snip

[Vo]:Rossi's Customer is not who is?

If somebody can understand this. please explain: Mattia Battistich October 22nd, 2011 at 9:59 AM Dear Dr. Rossi, 1) A few weeks ago I remember reading a quote on you saying that by mid October, a week before the test scheduled for the 28th, you would have revealed the location where your first

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's Customer is not who is?

My guess is that AR was approached by one entity who was really representing a different entity. AR has now found who the first entity represented and has learned that it wishes to remain anonymous. LockMart? T

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's Customer is not who is?

On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: My guess is that AR was approached by one entity who was really representing a different entity.  AR has now found who the first entity represented and has learned that it wishes to remain anonymous. LockMart? Well,

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's Customer is not who is?

Thanks, very plausible. If this second Entity is satisfied with a short test, it is OK for Rossi. Not for the value of the test. I ma not very optimistic re the Customer's virtues. On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: My guess is that AR was approached by one

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's Customer is not who is?

Maybe there was an acquisition since the arrangement was made. Sent from my iPhone. On Oct 22, 2011, at 12:29, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote: If somebody can understand this. please explain: Mattia Battistich October 22nd, 2011 at 9:59 AM Dear Dr. Rossi, 1) A few weeks ago

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's Customer is not who is?

On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Charles Hope lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe there was an acquisition since the arrangement was made. That also fits the story. T

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's Customer is not who is?

Large companies have many different subsidiaries. It could be that they had contacts with the industrial group X without knowing that the one among the subsidiaries interested in the e-cat is working for military applications. In US there are a number of those. US because Rossi says that is