I bet that the cause of the meltdown in the first test was the stainless
steel cover that reduced heat dissipation by convection. In the most resent
test, IH decided to run the test without the stainless steel shell cover to
increase heat dissipation by convection.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:29
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sat, 25 Oct 2014 21:25:44 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Don't forget that only a tiny sample of the ash was measured. It's entirely
possible that the sample just happened to be one in which the process was
complete. If the reaction wasn't uniform throughout the reactor
Stefano Landi:
1) in your conference in Italy you said about a procedure of Ni isotop
enrichment. Is this in agreement what the results of the Itp report? The amount
of Ni isotopes before the run do not seem enriched as compared to the natural
Ni isotopes composition
Rossi:
1- At those
So maybe the hotcat wasn't running OUT of fuel at 32 days : it had completed
the Ni isotope conversion (to a greater degree than Rossi expected), and was
then running at peak efficiency?
Remember the melted hotcat in the first Levi report?
I wonder if they lost control because it also
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Stefano Landi:
1) in your conference in Italy you said about a procedure of Ni isotop
enrichment. Is this in agreement what the results of the Itp report? The
amount of Ni isotopes before the run do not seem enriched as
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
So maybe the hotcat wasn't running OUT of fuel at 32 days : it had
completed the Ni isotope conversion (to a greater degree than Rossi
expected), and was then running at peak efficiency?
This could explain the improvement in
6 matches
Mail list logo
