On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Energy states are quantized IMO because the De Broglie wave of the electron
needs to be in phase with itself as it wraps around the circumference of the
atom.
Carver Mead wrote an interesting little book about this, called
Collective
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Jeff Fink's message of Sat, 9 Jun 2007 07:00:25 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
So, why can’t people living within a few hundred feet of high voltage
transmission lines tap useful “free” power with a 60 Hz receiver circuit?
[snip]
Are you sure they can't?
I
Hi,
My previous post stated that the frequency varied from about 150 Hz to 1 kHz. In
fact due to the weakening of the Earth's field with altitude, the frequency
actually remains fairly well constrained within a range of 300-350 Hz over the
altitude interval where the effect would work.
Below 700
Hi,
BTW this energy transfer method probably also fits the energy transfer from a
hydrogen atom to a catalyst atom during Hydrino formation. Both transmitter and
receiver are high Q resonant systems.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
The shrub is a plant.
Could the electron and the nucleus as a magnetically coupled resonant
systems explain why energy states are quantized?
Harry
On 10/6/2007 2:26 AM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Hi,
BTW this energy transfer method probably also fits the energy transfer from a
hydrogen atom to a catalyst atom
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:14:36 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Could the electron and the nucleus as a magnetically coupled resonant
systems explain why energy states are quantized?
[snip]
Energy states are quantized IMO because the De Broglie wave of the electron
needs to be
So, why can’t people living within a few hundred feet of high voltage
transmission lines tap useful “free” power with a 60 Hz receiver circuit?
Jeff
_
From: John Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 11:57 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tesla
, June 09, 2007 4:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tesla Revisted
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:00:21 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I can't explain it with em theory, but it behaves like a simple pendulum.
Ignoring friction, once the pendulum is set in motion it will keep swinging
emitting radio waves (which requires power) towards
infinity?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 4:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tesla Revisted
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri
Michel wrote:
Indeed a primary with an open secondary behaves
like a pure inductor, so it's a purely reactive
load, so current in it can be made to oscillate
non dissipatively (assuming resistance of the
coil is negligible). In terms of transformer it
makes perfect sense. But in terms
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Michel Jullian wrote:
On the how it works side, has anybody understood the difference
between this MHz resonant magnetic coupling device and a radio emitter
with a tuned receiver?
Any EM antenna behaves as a hole in an opaque plate. A coil 10cm in
diameter behaves as a
In reply to Jeff Fink's message of Sat, 9 Jun 2007 07:00:25 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
So, why cant people living within a few hundred feet of high voltage
transmission lines tap useful free power with a 60 Hz receiver circuit?
[snip]
Are you sure they can't?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
The shrub
Jeff Fink wrote:
So, why cant people living within a few hundred feet
of high voltage transmission lines tap useful free
power with a 60 Hz receiver circuit?
They can and have. You don't see it anymore, but I
used to read of the occasional farmer caught at this
sort of thing, usually
Look at Stubblefields wireless telephone, it was loops of wire at audio (not
radio) frequencies and IMO worked better than conventional EM would consider
possible.
The magnetic field caught a lift rather literally, indeed here are devices
that can make rather impressive magnetic beams or in one
Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 4:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tesla Revisted
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:00:21 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I can't explain it with em theory, but it behaves like a simple
pendulum.
Ignoring
In reply to John Berry's message of Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:34:57 +1200:
Hi,
[snip]
Look into Earl Ammann if your interested in distant transmission of
electrical energy.
[snip]
I did, and combined this with Tesla to come up with the following based on the
MIT work.
Most of the kinetic energy in the
Hi,
BTW, the lower Van Allen belt extends from about 700 to 1 km above the
surface, so the average distance is about 5000 km, which matches a frequency of
60 Hz. Tesla's magic number anyone? ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
The shrub is a plant.
From Michael Foster:
Oh, here's another one, where they actually mention Tesla
but claim he only attempted it. I guess they don't know
he used to light up his whole lab this way. This sort of
thing never ceases to amaze me.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070607/ap_on_hi_te/wireless_power
M.
Some images from google:
http://tinyurl.com/yweesp
or
08, 2007 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tesla Revisted
Some images from google:
http://tinyurl.com/yweesp
or
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.teslasociety.com/pictures/wardenc3.jpgimgrefurl=http://amasci.com/tesla/tesray1.htmlh=841w=600sz=80hl=enstart=1tbnid
On 8/6/2007 7:53 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
From Michael Foster:
Oh, here's another one, where they actually mention Tesla
but claim he only attempted it. I guess they don't know
he used to light up his whole lab this way. This sort of
thing never ceases to amaze me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tesla Revisted
On 8/6/2007 7:53 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
From Michael Foster:
Oh, here's another one, where they actually mention Tesla
but claim he only attempted it. I guess they don't know
he
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tesla Revisted
On 8/6/2007 7:53 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
From Michael Foster:
Oh, here's another one, where they actually mention Tesla
but claim he only attempted it. I guess they don't
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:00:21 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I can't explain it with em theory, but it behaves like a simple pendulum.
Ignoring friction, once the pendulum is set in motion it will keep swinging
with the same amplitude until the pendulum is used to power a
You would want it to be low distance and frequency specific so the neighbors
can't tap into your power supply.
I believe it is entirely possible because what is happening is a flow of
aether of being established between Primary and Secondary making them very
close inductively and if you do it
Check this out. Scientists have discovered wireless transmission
of power in the home. Don't suppose they'll give poor ol' Tesla
any credit.
http://tinyurl.com/3e4c6b
M.
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on
Oh, here's another one, where they actually mention Tesla
but claim he only attempted it. I guess they don't know
he used to light up his whole lab this way. This sort of
thing never ceases to amaze me.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070607/ap_on_hi_te/wireless_power
M.
27 matches
Mail list logo
