Re: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles?

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 3 May 2011 09:30:24 -0400: Hi, [snip] And dark matter is seasonal: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20434-second-experiment-hints-at-seasonal-dark-matter-signal.html T DAMA uses an array of sodium iodide detectors to spot the rare moments when

Re: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles?

Hi, On 2-5-2011 18:22, Jones Beene wrote: In addition to that, and possibly far more relevant to the experimenter - you have the Sun's rotation- or should I say double rotation. The core of the sun rotates at a different rate than its surface, and it works out to every 33 days. The solar core

Re: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles?

And dark matter is seasonal: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20434-second-experiment-hints-at-seasonal-dark-matter-signal.html T

RE: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles?

Here is an implication of the story: The detector they use comprises a 440-gram crystal of germanium... dark matter is so abundant that 100 million particles of it are expected to pass through the CoGeNT detector every second... OK - Terry may be imagining the same thing that I am - that if dark

Re: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles?

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Leading one to wonder ... hmmm ... if perhaps spillover hydrogen captured in a nickel matrix is that sought-after antenna for dark matter. And if dark matter is actually a hydrino with the electron teetering on the brink

RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles?

Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles? Here is an implication of the story: The detector they use comprises a 440-gram crystal of germanium... dark matter is so abundant that 100 million particles of it are expected to pass through the CoGeNT detector every second... OK

RE: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles?

-Original Message- From: Roarty, Francis X Is dark matter another label for ether Possibly it is a different aspect of it. Too bad that you were not around to enjoy some of Frank Grimer's aether musings a few years back... He has a hierarchical aether theory that could fit in very

Re: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles?

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Possibly it is a different aspect of it. Too bad that you were not around to enjoy some of Frank Grimer's aether musings a few years back... He has a hierarchical aether theory that could fit in very well to the Rossi

RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles?

-Original Message- From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:05 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles? -Original Message- From: Roarty, Francis X Is dark matter another label for ether Possibly

[Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles?

Curious thing happens when you keep good lab notes over extended periods ... Without getting into details yet, or addressing such niceties as Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus... it is clear that different cosmological cycles can influence activity in subtle ways ... and in not-so-subtle

RE: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles?

: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 9:23 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles? Curious thing happens when you keep good lab notes over extended periods ... Without getting into details yet, or addressing

[Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles?

Hi Jones, Nice citation! I would speculate the neutrinos are NOT interacting with the radioactive gas to change the decay rate, Could the neutrinos simply indicate when a solar scale fluctuation in the rate at which the ether intersects the spatial axis occurs? As relativistic