Andrea Rossi
June 6th, 2011 at 2:38 PM
Dear Greg:
Good point.
This is why we are very conservative regarding the sale of single
modules. We are engineering a system that will destroy automatically the
confidential parts if the reactor is open. The reactors will be open only
in our factory to
From Alan, reporting on Rossi:
Andrea Rossi
June 6th, 2011 at 2:38 PM
Dear Greg:
Good point.
This is why we are very conservative regarding the sale of single modules.
We are engineering a system that will destroy automatically the confidential
parts if the reactor is open. The reactors
I wonder is some sort of non-destructive neutron activation probe can
overcome the kill mechanism?
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:14 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
From Alan, reporting on Rossi:
Andrea Rossi
June 6th, 2011 at 2:38 PM
Dear Greg:
Good
Oh come now, Andrea! That sounds like a James Bond movie villain's
secret headquarters. I love those places! They are built inside of
volcano or underwater. The villains apparently all go to the same
engineering firm, which is the world's worst. Probably unlicensed. James
Bond throws one
At 02:24 PM 6/6/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
My guess about what Rossi means: the Ni catalyst is very reactive
stuff. When you expose it to air it is rapidly contaminated, and it
does not work well after that. Or it does not work at all.
I'd bet that if you put the stuff, however contaminated,
From Jed:
...
My guess about what Rossi means: the Ni catalyst is very reactive stuff.
When you expose it to air it is rapidly contaminated, and it does not work
well after that. Or it does not work at all.
Lots of modern high tech stuff stops working if you open it up, by the way.
NiCad
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I'd bet that if you put the stuff, however contaminated, through a mass
spectrometer you could figure out what the catalyst is, and probably the
approximate proportion.
A person who has a mass spectrometer would know to open the cell in a glove
box, in a
Has anyone read Atlas Shrugged? The protagonist develops a new engine
which runs off a new and undiscovered type of energy. He doesn't trust
anyone to respect his intellectual property, so he designs his lab to
self-destruct should anyone try to enter it without his permission.
:)
Craig
It would certainly be a violation of the lease contract to try to open one,
with severe penalties, as well as probably illegal due to anti-reverse
engineering laws.
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
[Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.] ... the approximate
On 2011-06-06 23:02, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
This is why we are very conservative regarding the sale of single
modules. We are engineering a system that will destroy automatically the
confidential parts if the reactor is open. The reactors will be open
only in our factory to replace the charge.
LOL! Wanna buy a bridge?
T
On 2011-06-06 23:02, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Andrea Rossi
He added this today:
* * *
Dear Dr. Rossi,
thank you for your reply. You write you are being conservative regarding
the sales of single modules. But if Defkalion/AmpEnergo plans to produce
300 000 units per year do you think you
Subject: Re: [Vo]:eCat self-destruct mode
On 2011-06-06 23:02, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
...Nobody is ever going to allow the sale of devices that self-destruct,
or in other words that actively destroy, disintegrate parts covered by
trade secret upon unauthorized tampering or disassembling. Passive
From Rossi:
Regarding the protection of e-cat secrets.
Dear Greg:
Defkalion, I suppose, will not sell modules until the protection issue will
not be resolved.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Andrea supposes? 8D He can't be serious.
By hook or crook, China will secure all the e-cats they need - all in
In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:02:20 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Andrea Rossi
June 6th, 2011 at 2:38 PM
Dear Greg:
Good point.
This is why we are very conservative regarding the sale of single modules. We
are engineering a system that will destroy automatically the
Hi,
Bad thoughts... ;-)
This idea of protection by self distruction could imply the following:
- market life of the product cannot be extended by RD over the years
(i.e. the ecat cannot evolve much)
- Defkalion/Ampenergo are not capable of becaming *the* brand for LENR
devices they would not
On 2011-06-07 00:27, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Andrea supposes?8D He can't be serious.
I doubt he is. How are they going to have total control on hundred of
thousands of devices supposedly going to be manufactured, anyway?
Motivated people and organizations will crack them open
In reply to Akira Shirakawa's message of Tue, 07 Jun 2011 01:14:03 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
I do think that too, if his E-Cats will work as intended; less so if in
order to pursue personal wealth (as if he isn't going to get rich
anyway) he is going to willingly delay and limit public access to the
18 matches
Mail list logo
