Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-20 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
On 19.10.2022 11:57, Jonathan Berry wrote: Like the other video it also uses Feynman diagrams, it doesn't directly mention the Lamb shift but it states that strength of electromagnetic fields is again related to all the possible outcomes with Feynman diagrams. This - Feynman diagrams -

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-19 Thread Jonathan Berry
will pop up as I >> find nothing credible about cloud electrification ideas. >> >> >> >> *From:* bobcook39...@hotmail.com >> *Sent:* Monday, October 17, 2022 6:24 PM >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "A

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-18 Thread Jonathan Berry
electrification ideas. > > > > *From:* bobcook39...@hotmail.com > *Sent:* Monday, October 17, 2022 6:24 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether" > > > > Electric permittivity and magnetic megmiabilityu of space necess

RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-18 Thread Chris Zell
...@hotmail.com Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 6:24 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether" Electric permittivity and magnetic megmiabilityu of space necessary to calculate the speed of light support the physical model of space and hence the concept of an anther.

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-17 Thread Jonathan Berry
ight support the physical model of space and hence > the concept of an anther. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows > > > > *From: *Jonathan Berry > *Sent: *Tuesday, October 11,

RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"--added comment

2022-10-17 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Monday, October 17, 2022 3:24 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether" Electric permittivity and magnetic megmiabilityu of space necessary to calculate the speed of light support the physical model of space and hence the conc

RE: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-17 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Berry<mailto:jonathanberry3...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 12:04 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether" Well if you consider all of the possible interactions that could happen with so-called virtual particles (whateve

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-11 Thread Jonathan Berry
Well if you consider all of the possible interactions that could happen with so-called virtual particles (whatever quantum field theory might call them) it calculates the exact value and is the "most successful calculation/prediction in physics". I can't judge the relative value of the model you

Re: [Vo]:Arguments for an "Aether"

2022-10-11 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
So we know that the electric field from the Nucleus of a Hydrogen Nucleus can polarize the virtual particles and cause partial shielding, this results in the Lamb shift. This is standard model word salad. Virtual particles  are just a mathematical construct an thus never something real.