exploitable forces.
Fran
From: Hauke Hein [mailto:hhe...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 9:48 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back
Hi Steven
I was thinking that maybe hydrogen at low
pressure and moderate temperature has a
molecular
rms
To me, Hotson’s view is also correct, and another way of saying the same thing…
possibly more intuitive, since it recognizes that epo field can “materialize”
when excited, but is always a background condition.
From: Bob Higgins
According to Hotson, pair production is not matter creation, it
Steven,
It's called pair production and is well-known but requires high energy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production
.photons converted to matter and vice-versa.
.kinda like, you know . dilithium crystals. J
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Does there exist any kind of
According to Hotson, pair production is not matter creation, it is only
ionizing an epo (electron - positron pair in a DDL-like orbit). To me,
this is far more plausible than matter creation.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Steven,
It’s called “pair
Bob, Jones,
Thanks for humoring me. I am not surprised that discussing energy/matter
conversion techniques in 21st century terms is, how should I put it, a
debatable matter.
Here's where I'm going with my previous request:
If practical M/E conversion technology could eventually be
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back
Hi Steven
I read your idea with the cannonball between
two reflekting mirrors.
I had an idea similar but with lets say
hydrogen atoms reflectet between two vertical parallel
walls at escape velocity.I think those particals
would follow a parabolic path
---
Desde: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net
Enviado: 27 de julio de 2015 16:09
Para: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Asunto: RE: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back
Bob, Jones,
Thanks for humoring me. I am not surprised that discussing energy/matter
conversion techniques in 21st century
could be used. And there are a few other caveats too.
-mark iverson
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 10:12 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back
Steven,
It's called pair production and is well-known but requires
@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back
Hi Steven
I read your idea with the cannonball between
two reflekting mirrors.
I had an idea similar but with lets say
hydrogen atoms reflectet between two vertical parallel
walls at escape velocity.I think those particals
would follow
9 matches
Mail list logo
