RE: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

2016-02-29 Thread Jones Beene
This is a revival of an earlier thread. From: Russ George * What about a secondary muon target re-emitter… what would the ideal target and emission be? According to the literature, muons are absorbed in rough linear proportion to the atomic number of the target…. Since Uranium (92)

Re: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

2016-02-21 Thread Axil Axil
http://www.gizmag.com/physicist-smartphones-pocket-cosmic-ray-detectors/34121/ App turns a smartphone into a pocket-sized cosmic ray detector We talked about this many times. On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Bob Cook wrote: > Russ and Jones-- > > Steve Jones had a

Re: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

2016-02-21 Thread Bob Cook
Merging Holmlid and HeffnerRuss and Jones-- Steve Jones had a method for catching negative muons in hydrogen to effect a muon catalyzed fusion reaction. That fusion reaction would produce a good signature to suggest the presence of muons. I think a batch of liquid hydrogen behind a high

RE: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

2016-02-21 Thread Jones Beene
Yes, dig up that old aquarium in the garage or attic and get some dry ice. Here is a design that uses Peltiers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqM4CsM4ewI From: Axil Axil >From the top of my head, a cloud chamber... Russ George wrote: What might be a variety of means,

RE: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

2016-02-21 Thread Jones Beene
From: Russ George Ø What about a secondary muon target re-emitter… what would the ideal target and emission be? Muons are generally absorbed in linear proportion to the atomic number of the target. Since Uranium would be among the best targets, and since the secondary reactions

Re: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

2016-02-21 Thread Axil Axil
> What about a secondary muon target re-emitter… what would the ideal target > and emission be? > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, February 21, 2016 12:38 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner > > >

RE: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

2016-02-21 Thread Russ George
What about a secondary muon target re-emitter… what would the ideal target and emission be? From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 12:38 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner >From the top of my head, a cloud cham

Re: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

2016-02-21 Thread Axil Axil
Mesons production implies that protons and neutrons are being destabilized and are decaying. Kaon formation is very strange because of the symmetry violations that kaon formation implies. What this state of affairs means for the various nuclei in the volume that this decay is happening is not

Re: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

2016-02-21 Thread Axil Axil
>From the top of my head, a cloud chamber... On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Russ George wrote: > What might be a variety of means, low tech to high tech, to detect low > energy muons? > > > > *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] > *Sent:* Sunday, February

RE: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

2016-02-21 Thread Russ George
What might be a variety of means, low tech to high tech, to detect low energy muons? From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 12:19 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner The deflation hypothesis of Horace Heffner is