RE: [Vo]: Mock paper... NOT!

2012-01-13 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
- From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 10:01 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Mock paper Well, at least Santilli is a degreed physicist with considerable credentials from places like MIT and Harvard; the following Bio is from his

Re: [Vo]:Mock paper

2012-01-12 Thread Harry Veeder
Would someone tell me if this a sincere paper? Perhaps I have grown cynical over the last year, because of Rossi's dismissal of scientific practice and the new level of secrecy surrounding LENR research, but I'm remain very skeptical. To me the pictures look like dummy apparatuses which mock

Re: [Vo]:Mock paper

2012-01-12 Thread Mary Yugo
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: Would someone tell me if this a sincere paper? Perhaps I have grown cynical over the last year, because of Rossi's dismissal of scientific practice and the new level of secrecy surrounding LENR research, but I'm remain

RE: [Vo]:Mock paper

2012-01-12 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
: Thursday, January 12, 2012 6:12 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mock paper Would someone tell me if this a sincere paper? Perhaps I have grown cynical over the last year, because of Rossi's dismissal of scientific practice and the new level of secrecy surrounding LENR research, but I'm

Re: [Vo]:Mock paper

2012-01-12 Thread Harry Veeder
How come none of Santilli's papers are in the LENR-CANR library? eg. http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/ICNF-1.pdf Has he attended the ICCF meetings? Has Jed or any of Jed's associates met him? Harry On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 12,

Re: [Vo]:Mock paper

2012-01-12 Thread Harry Veeder
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mock paper Would someone tell me if this a sincere paper? Perhaps I have grown cynical over the last year, because of Rossi's dismissal of scientific practice and the new level of secrecy surrounding LENR research, but I'm remain very skeptical.  To me

Re: [Vo]:Mock paper

2012-01-12 Thread Aussie Guy E-Cat
Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 6:12 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mock paper Would someone tell me if this a sincere paper? Perhaps I have grown cynical over the last year, because of Rossi's dismissal of scientific practice and the new level

RE: [Vo]:Mock paper

2012-01-12 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
journals. -m -Original Message- From: Harry Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 9:21 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mock paper How come none of Santilli's papers are in the LENR-CANR library? eg. http://www.santilli-foundation.org/docs/ICNF-1

Re: [Vo]:Mock paper

2012-01-12 Thread Peter Gluck
See Lawsuits here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruggero_Santilli A very ugly story- I remember that being a member of the advisory board I have had to pay 12,000 USD fine. The lawsuit did not started but Gene was very upset and stressed by this affair. An even uglier story- Richardson's

RE: [Vo]:Mock paper

2012-01-12 Thread Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
- From: Harry Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 9:35 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mock paper If this is true then don't you think Santilli's claims are even more extravagant (to use one of M. Y.' s favorite adjectives) than Rossi's claims? harry