On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:21:44 -0800 Jones Beene said
[snip] OK. Many of us are now using f/H to mean generic fractional
hydrogen,
since Mills has trademarked the 'Hydrino' name, and is now trying to enforce
the (tm), but in any event RM did not get the theory precisely correct, so
how about
Very interesting observation, Frank.
Don't forget Horace's model of a deflated species. or the Dufour hydrex
and there are others. Robin has a 'faux D' . and deuterium clusters are
not far off - it would be informative to try to get together a complete
listing with emphasis on the likenesses
There are many interesting aspects to this. I am particularly
intriqued by what provokes punishment:
http://www.its.caltech.edu/~qoptics/beerfund.html
in what appears to be an odd feedback mechanism.
Terry
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Very
Yes. It's a new thing in higher education ... negative reinforcement.
Surprisingly Boozer is not number uno ... ;)
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
There are many interesting aspects to this. I am particularly
intrigued by what provokes punishment:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The “f/Husor” ? … ok don’t laugh, nobody’s perfect …
Too close to freaking Hoosier.
:-)
Terry
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:20:10 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
A recent trend that is gaining traction in the LENR world is what can be
called the pycno-IEC reactor. It is really more than a trend, and may soon
be approaching 'paradigm shift.'
It will likely be the first
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Here Miley specifically talks about two different devices, a high power IEC
device and low power CF devices. I fail to see the connection you appear to
be
implying. BTW it amazes me that someone with his credentials could suggest
the
IEC device
7 matches
Mail list logo
