I didn't quite finish the analogy...
Imagine the wheel of a car being an electron, which is perfectly balanced
and rotates perfectly. Now add a lead weight (a quantum of heat), and the
wheel now is wobbling all around since it is 'out of balance'. That in turn
causes the entire car (atom) to
An ensemble of coherent objects acts in unison based on discrete quantum
levels. When quantum particles (matter waves) are coherent, phase (A
description of the quantum properties that define each specific quantum
property associated with the ensemble) can only be applied based on
discrete quantum
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 8 Jan 2012 02:35:02 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Where N can be 1 to very many, N identical waves are said to be coherent.
These many waves have the same waveform; they are all in fact the same
wave. Since particles are matter waves, N particles that are identical and
...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 7:59 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cooper pairing of protons
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 8 Jan 2012 02:35:02 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Where N can be 1 to very many, N identical waves are said to be coherent
Here is a quantum mechanical experiment that supports some of the
theroretical components put forth in the proton pair conjecture:
Seeing quantum mechanics with the naked eye
http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-quantum-mechanics-naked-eye.html
This is of interest to me regarding a possible
Last time I checked DGT denies the use of a RFG.
T
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
These resonance interactions come from the crystal structure of metal
lattices and the quantum phonons that vibrate through the lattice at just
the right temperature. It also
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Last time I checked DGT denies the use of a RFG.
Yes - they absolutely deny it when asked specifically. And they seem to be
far more forthcoming than Rossi, but not completely honest.
Does anyone has direct or indirect evidence of RF being
, 2012 9:46 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Cooper pairing of protons
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Last time I checked DGT denies the use of a RFG.
Yes - they absolutely deny it when asked specifically. And they seem to be
far more forthcoming than Rossi
Well there is always that mystery window ...
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X
Defkalion must have some form of agitation in the reactor
Last time I checked DGT denies the use of a RFG.
Yes - they absolutely deny it when asked specifically. And they seem to be
far more
In our everyday world of illusion, a miracle is a highly improbable event.
But in the real world of quantum mechanics (QM), if it can happen, it will
happen, but just not very often.
The trick for the cold fusion engineer is to somehow adjust the quantum
probabilities to make miracles happen
Maybe someone can shed a light.
How are Celani's comments, cooper pairing and Kim's BECNF theory related ?
- If they are related, why doesn't Celani mention Kim in his presentation,
he mentions almost all other proposed theories ?
Moab
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Jones Beene
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
In our everyday world of illusion, a miracle is a highly improbable event.
But in the real world of quantum mechanics (QM), if it can happen, it will
happen, but just not very often.
That is a sense of the word miracle that
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
So if you back off the details a little ways and look at the generalize QM
mechanism, the D+D reaction is still caused by QM entanglement and
coherence---see Dr. Kim references section in the following:
Pd-D has surprisingly little in common with Ni-H, in theory or in practice.
As far as most physical and especially nuclear properties are concerned, the
fact that H and D are both chemically reactive volatile gases is the main
connection. In fact, on close inspection, it is a big surprise to
None of which addresses my empirical question:
Does Pd+D (as does Ni+Cu+P) exhibit a negative coefficient of temperature
as the Fleischmann Pons effect emerges from that system?
From your argument below, I take it your answer is No.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Jones Beene
From: James Bowery
Does Pd+D (as does Ni+Cu+P) exhibit a negative coefficient of temperature as
the Fleischmann Pons effect emerges from that system?
From your argument below, I take it your answer is No.
Well, unless there is evidence out there - which we have not been made aware
of, then
One last thought before this thread becomes a part of history.
I speculate that Rossi has found experimentally that proton absorption into
the nickel nucleus will have a higher cross section when “heavy’ nickel
isotopes: Ni62 and Ni64 are enhanced in his powder.
These heavy isotopes have more
These resonance interactions come from the crystal structure of metal
lattices and the quantum phonons that vibrate through the lattice at just
the right temperature. It also comes from certain chemical bound
configurations involving hydrogen. And these resonance reactions may even
come from the
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
In Brian Ahern's work on the Arata effect, which... is NOT
the F-P effect
So we're witness to not one, but TWO miracles of energy production that
just happen to involve hydrogen-metal systems?
One miracle is enough to
That is a fair comment from the bleacher section, since superficially using
LENR as an umbrella for everything related to hydrogen may make it seem
like two miracles. However deuterium is completely different from hydrogen
in so many ways that the two can be considered to be completely different
Jones:
Thanks for your diplomatic comments on my late night posting... I will
reread and think about them.
Trying to up the SNR a notch or two...
RE: Cooper pairs...
This is one of my pet peeves about the old, simplistic atomic models. We
were taught the following in school/college:
- opposite
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
In short, forget the bogus two miracle argument.
Sure I'll forget the bogus two miracle argument -- especially since I
never encountered it.
As for the valid two miracle argument, its not going to go away simply
because
From: James Bowery
* Tell me I'm wrong.
Yes, James, you are wrong.
Not just wrong but possibly wrong for several reasons, depending on
semantics and your writing skills.
First off, are you a native English speaker?
We are very tolerant of differences in languages and translations of
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
You say: D+D = He4 reaction involves two pairs of fermions and even
accuse me of 'forgetting' something.
Where are these two pairs fermions of which you speak ? What did I forget?
Where are two pairs of anything?
Two
Where N can be 1 to very many, N identical waves are said to be coherent.
These many waves have the same waveform; they are all in fact the same
wave. Since particles are matter waves, N particles that are identical and
indistinguishable are coherent. These matter waves can be made identical
by
25 matches
Mail list logo
