On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:42 AM, noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.comwrote:
The big cost difference between E-Cat technology and conventional
technologies will of course be the fuel cost. The fuel cost for a one
megawatt cold fusion planet will probably be at least 1/1000 times less
than one
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:01 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:42 AM, noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.comwrote:
The big cost difference between E-Cat technology and conventional
technologies will of course be the fuel cost. The fuel cost for a one
the Vort collective come up with any logic for his series claims?
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:07:33 -0600
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cats and 450 deg C steam
From: jabow...@gmail.com
To: thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
CC: vortex-l@eskimo.com
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:01 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote
series claims?
--
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:07:33 -0600
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cats and 450 deg C steam
From: jabow...@gmail.com
To: thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
CC: vortex-l@eskimo.com
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:01 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov
I think this is very good news.
If he can create electricity even moderately efficiently, this technology is
going to change the world -- BIG TIME!
The big cost difference between E-Cat technology and conventional technologies
will of course be the fuel cost. The fuel cost for a one megawatt
Difficult to guess what's the PRIMARY FLUID. It cannot be organic, perhaps
molten salts or molten metal.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Very interesting news: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-**
6 matches
Mail list logo
