Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-14 Thread Peter Heckert
Am 14.09.2011 01:20, schrieb Horace Heffner: On Sep 13, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Peter Heckert wrote: Am 13.09.2011 22:47, schrieb Man on Bridges: Hi, On 13-9-2011 20:44, Horace Heffner wrote: snip calculation of lead shielding Hmmm, is there a way to start and stop a gamma radiation source, as

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-14 Thread Peter Heckert
Am 14.09.2011 02:17, schrieb Man on Bridges: Hi, On 14-9-2011 1:20, Horace Heffner wrote: snip calculation Just a thought. Let's suppose Rossi is using a gamma radiation source as a catalyzer. Is it then possible to determine the source (catalyzer) of the gamma source, if the following

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-14 Thread Peter Heckert
Am 14.09.2011 08:20, schrieb Peter Heckert: As soon as it is totally and unmistakenly clear, this is a nuclear reaction that produces large amounts of energy, law will stop him. And international scientific research will start. You cannot discover the stone of philosophers and commercialize

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-14 Thread Horace Heffner
On Sep 13, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Peter Heckert wrote: Am 14.09.2011 01:20, schrieb Horace Heffner: On Sep 13, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Peter Heckert wrote: Am 13.09.2011 22:47, schrieb Man on Bridges: Hi, On 13-9-2011 20:44, Horace Heffner wrote: snip calculation of lead shielding Hmmm, is

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-14 Thread Peter Heckert
Am 14.09.2011 10:08, schrieb Horace Heffner: It is not possible to put enough lead in the device to suppress the 1.33 MeV gammas from cobalt to even a non-lethal level - provided there is enough cobalt to sustain a 15 kW reaction at one gamma per LENR reaction. Yes this is correct. But

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-14 Thread Horace Heffner
On Sep 14, 2011, at 12:29 AM, Peter Heckert wrote: Am 14.09.2011 10:08, schrieb Horace Heffner: It is not possible to put enough lead in the device to suppress the 1.33 MeV gammas from cobalt to even a non-lethal level - provided there is enough cobalt to sustain a 15 kW reaction at one

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-14 Thread Man on Bridges
Hi Horrace e.a., On 14-9-2011 23:40, Horace Heffner wrote: In any case, I think there is no reasonable possibility of a Co60 source of any possible significance being hidden behind the 2 cm lead shielding. However, there are various other radioactive materials that very well might be hidden

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-13 Thread Horace Heffner
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:10 AM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: Hi, Could it be that Rossi uses a Cobalt60 gamma source as catalyzer? Cobalt 60 decays to Nickel60 and emits gamma rays. The gamma spectrum could be just the right spectrum and energy to excite the Nickel nucleus. Maybe it is

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-13 Thread Peter Heckert
Horace, thank you very much. I dont have the knowledge to calculate this. Only know the very basics. Found this via google: http://itcanbeshown.com/NERS425/Lab5/Shielding%20-%20Final%20Version.pdf There is data about screening. My idea was, it could be a very small and weak source, such as

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-13 Thread Man on Bridges
Hi, On 13-9-2011 20:44, Horace Heffner wrote: snip calculation of lead shielding Hmmm, is there a way to start and stop a gamma radiation source, as it may be used only to trigger the process? Why I'm asking, well I remembered an older message earlier this year from Jed. Sorry, for the

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-13 Thread Axil Axil
So we need something that ionizises or atomizes the hydrogen molecules, and something that is very unusual for hydride systems. If the Rossi reaction turns out to be centered on highly excited hydrogen atoms... The bumpy surface of a nickel lattice will “field-ionized” the Rydberg atoms in a

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-13 Thread Peter Heckert
Am 13.09.2011 22:47, schrieb Man on Bridges: Hi, On 13-9-2011 20:44, Horace Heffner wrote: snip calculation of lead shielding Hmmm, is there a way to start and stop a gamma radiation source, as it may be used only to trigger the process? There is no other way than shielding or increasing

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-13 Thread Horace Heffner
On Sep 13, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Peter Heckert wrote: Horace, thank you very much. I dont have the knowledge to calculate this. Only know the very basics. Found this via google: http://itcanbeshown.com/NERS425/Lab5/Shielding%20-%20Final% 20Version.pdf There is data about screening. Yes.

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-13 Thread Horace Heffner
On Sep 13, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Peter Heckert wrote: Am 13.09.2011 22:47, schrieb Man on Bridges: Hi, On 13-9-2011 20:44, Horace Heffner wrote: snip calculation of lead shielding Hmmm, is there a way to start and stop a gamma radiation source, as it may be used only to trigger the process?

Re: [Vo]:Rossi e-cat catalyzer, Gamma rays

2011-09-13 Thread Man on Bridges
Hi, On 14-9-2011 1:20, Horace Heffner wrote: snip calculation Just a thought. Let's suppose Rossi is using a gamma radiation source as a catalyzer. Is it then possible to determine the source (catalyzer) of the gamma source, if the following parameters are known? 1. Maximum allowed gamma