In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 1 Jul 2018 14:35:59 -0600:
Hi Erik,
[snip]
>But I realize now you probably meant there are no neutral muons, rather
>than that there are no neutral leptons.
IIRC I just forgot about neutrinos. ;)
>
>On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 2:34 PM Eric Walker wrote:
>
But I realize now you probably meant there are no neutral muons, rather
than that there are no neutral leptons.
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 2:34 PM Eric Walker wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:40 PM wrote:
>
> Muons are leptons, and AFAIK there is no neutral variety. Did you mean
>>
Hi Robin,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:40 PM wrote:
Muons are leptons, and AFAIK there is no neutral variety. Did you mean
> neutral
> pions? (Which BTW have a very short half-life).
>
Neutrinos are neutral leptons. :)
Eric
In reply to H LV's message of Fri, 22 Jun 2018 21:59:18 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Wikipedia says the yield of the Davy Crockett bomb was between 10 and 20
>Tons of TNT.
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_(nuclear_device)
I watched part of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiM-RzPHyGs . It
rtex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Zimmerman's piece could be scarier than we can imagine
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Thu, 21 Jun 2018 23:28:53
+:
Hi,
[snip]
Muons are leptons, and AFAIK there is no neutral variety. Did you mean neutral
pions? (Which BTW have a very shor
Wikipedia says the yield of the Davy Crockett bomb was between 10 and 20
Tons of TNT.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_(nuclear_device)
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:33 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:08:41 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >AM wrote:
> >
rtex-l@eskimo.com
>Subject: RE: [Vo]:Zimmerman's piece could be scarier than we can imagine
>
>
>
>From: Axil Axil<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>
>
>
> * I can not see how the Bose Condensation nature of ultra dense material
> can support a chain reaction. The Condensat
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:08:41 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>AM wrote:
>
>If all the fission energy in 20 lb. of Pu239 were released it would be over
>> 175000 tons of TNT.
>>
>
>I do not think it is possible to release all of the energy from the fission
>explosion fuel.
>
AM wrote:
If all the fission energy in 20 lb. of Pu239 were released it would be over
> 175000 tons of TNT.
>
I do not think it is possible to release all of the energy from the fission
explosion fuel.
> If the bomb only yields 20 tons it is incredibly inefficient. I would
> expect
> more
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:56:04 -0400:
Hi,
If all the fission energy in 20 lb. of Pu239 were released it would be over
175000 tons of TNT.
If the bomb only yields 20 tons it is incredibly inefficient. I would expect
more like 2 tons.
>H LV wrote:
>
>The
If a quantum bomb could store energy in an entangled state, it would
explode by de-entanglement rather than by a chain reaction.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> I can not see how the Bose Condensation nature of ultra dense material can
> support a chain reaction. The
, June 20, 2018 12:19:18 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Zimmerman's piece could be scarier than we can imagine
From: Axil Axil<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>
* I can not see how the Bose Condensation nature of ultra dense material
can support a chain reaction. The Cond
H LV wrote:
The smallest nuke was the Davy Crockett weighing 76 lbs with an explosive
> yield of 20 Tons of TNT.
>
That's small! The critical mass of Pu is around 20 lb. 56 lbs of other
hardware.
What an idiotic weapon.
The smallest nuke was the Davy Crockett weighing 76 lbs with an explosive
yield of 20 Tons of TNT.
Compare with the 'conventional' MOAB bomb weighing 18,500 lbs with an
explosive of yield of 11 Tons of TNT.
The Davey Crockett was also more lethal due to the radiation it gave off.
LENR can produce transmutations at a distance. Urutskoev verified this
when he came up with his theory of how LENR produced the chernobyl
meltdown. Muons might favor U238 fission over U235 fission. This is what
makes LENR dangerous.
From
Low-energy nuclear reactions and the leptonic monopole
From: Axil Axil
➢ I can not see how the Bose Condensation nature of ultra dense material can
support a chain reaction. The Condensate offloads its excess energy through the
production of muons not neutrons. Muons are not bad like neutrons. Muons do not
pump the Condensate, so there is no
I can not see how the Bose Condensation nature of ultra dense material can
support a chain reaction. The Condensate offloads its excess energy through
the production of muons not neutrons. Muons are not bad like neutrons.
Muons do not pump the Condensate, so there is no positive feedback loop
17 matches
Mail list logo
