Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robin van Spaandonk wrote: This is another reason to use kevlar, however one also needs to take into consideration that the power wires need to be added to the weight of the cable . . . We have confused two different devices in this discussion. The power cable would be needed with the

Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-14 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: It would have to be extremely large I suppose, perhaps a kilometer in diameter (maybe 10 km?), so that the Kevlar tether could exert enough leverage to drive a 100 MW wheel without breaking. I mean a whole bunch of tethers. Obviously leverage does not increase power. I was trying to

Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-14 Thread Jones Beene
Looking ahead, there may be a better alternative to the basic theme... First, it ought to be easy to test the basic concept - which is a series of rotating wing-like airfoils - without going to the enormous expense of a jet steam version. Imagine a gigantic light-weight Ferris wheel built using

RE: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-14 Thread Keith Nagel
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 1:46 PM To: vortex-L@eskimo.com Subject: Re: Laddermill Wind Generator Jones Beene wrote: Imagine a gigantic light-weight Ferris wheel built using kevlar spokes with a thin rim of kevlar and with the airfoils attached to that rim. The airfoils

Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-14 Thread Horace Heffner
At 11:22 AM 4/14/5, Jed Rothwell wrote: The whole scheme is as improbable as Superman comic book. I must admit I have had to struggle to suppress the vision of a tangled mess falling from the sky. 8^) Processes like air turbulence which are described by differential equations tend to lead to

Re: Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-14 Thread Terry Blanton
From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] This could be the killer-ap which increases the demand for kevlar (and/or normal graphite fiber)to the level where cost falls very quickly. This web page: http://www.lr.tudelft.nl/asset/webpage/en/laddermill.php says to use dyneema:

Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-14 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:22:23 -0400: Hi, [snip] We have confused two different devices in this discussion. Well I had anyway. Sorry, I never really gave the laddermill any real consideration at all. The whole scheme is as improbable as Superman comic book. I

Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-14 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:06:04 -0400: Hi, [snip] This web page: http://www.lr.tudelft.nl/asset/webpage/en/laddermill.php says to use dyneema: http://www.dsm.com/en_US/html/hpf/home_dyneema.htm [snip] Yes, I slipped up, and used a figure for tensile modulus

Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-13 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton wrote: According to this article: http://tinyurl.com/6n4ty Delft Technical University is actually going to build one! Quotes from article: Strong high altitude winds acting on the “kitewings” produce as upward force on one side of the loop and a downward force on the other,

Re: Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-13 Thread Terry Blanton
From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't get it. I cannot imagine any material used for the tether would be strong enough to turn a 100 MW generator. Even 1 MW seems out of the question. I doubt the materials science people have been consulted for a 100 MW generator. ;-) Here's an

Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-13 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:49:24 -0400: Hi, [snip] I don't get it. I cannot imagine any material used for the tether would be strong enough to turn a 100 MW generator. Even 1 MW seems out of the question. [snip] Because any cable needs to be able to at least

Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-13 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:23:14 +1000: Hi, [snip] Because any cable needs to be able to at least support it's own weight, a maximum length can be calculated by dividing the tensile strength of the material by the density. For good steel I get 60 lb/sq.

Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-13 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:51:11 +1000: Hi, [snip] I wrote: iron (7.87 gm/mL) = 176000 ft. At that length, any extra tension (i.e. an addition real load), will break it. Actually that's wrong. Because of the way in which tensile strength is measured, the

Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-13 Thread orionworks
Hi Robin and Stephen, ... Actually that's wrong. Because of the way in which tensile strength is measured, the force pulling up on the cable can equal the weight of the cable, so even at maximum length, almost any upward force can be maintained, simply by making the cable thicker, until

Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-13 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Robin and Stephen, ... Actually that's wrong. Because of the way in which tensile strength is measured, the force pulling up on the cable can equal the weight of the cable, so even at maximum length, almost any upward force can be maintained, simply by making the

Re: Laddermill Wind Generator

2005-04-13 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:10:47 -0400: Hi, [snip] The problem is that the cable is going to hang in a catenary. If it's at a 45 degree angle at the kite, it's going to be at some much smaller angle relative to the ground. In order to avoid having