There are several possibilities for the UV, Lou - and your hat is now in the
ring along with Randy Mills and a few others.
Cleary EUV and soft x-rays are involved. Clearly the values are not falling
into the expected Rydberg levels. One value that stands out in this study is
the 19.29 nm
http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_11_01_2013_p0-632731.xml
Ever since Lockheed’s unsurpassed SR-71 Blackbird was retired from
U.S. Air Force service almost two decades ago, the perennial question
has been: Will it ever be succeeded by a new-generation, higher-speed
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you say Mach 6?
You heard the man. Mach 6. That's 4,567.2423 mph says Mr. Google.
Not escape velocity, which is Mach 34. That's what I would aim for. It
seems like it would more trouble than it is worth staying in the
atmosphere, with all that
http://ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=Sorb
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you say Mach 6?
You heard the man. Mach 6. That's 4,567.2423 mph says Mr. Google.
Not escape velocity, which is Mach 34.
Why escape velocity? Just orbital is good enough. A powerful ion propulsion
can slowly add 4km/s to achieve that.
2013/11/5 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you say Mach 6?
You heard the man. Mach 6. That's 4,567.2423 mph says Mr. Google.
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Why escape velocity? Just orbital is good enough. A powerful ion propulsion
can slowly add 4km/s to achieve that.
You are right. I got the two mixed up.
What would be the suborbital velocity for a trip halfway across the world,
which I assume is about
You have to love speed is the new stealth.
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/high-speed-strike-weapon--hssw--.html
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunitymode=formid=af217f963d28a50ef03f68c11f4e60a6tab=core_cview=1
Back of the envelope, 18,000 mph.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Why escape velocity? Just orbital is good enough. A powerful ion
propulsion can slowly add 4km/s to achieve that.
You are right. I got the
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Back of the envelope, 18,000 mph.
Modern, self-propelled artillery can land three shells on the same
target 40 miles away by firing three at different ballistic solutions
in rapid succession. Aren't war toys wonderful?
We
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Back of the envelope, 18,000 mph.
Hmm. That can also get you into low earth orbit depending on trajectory.
I am assuming this is a hybrid scramjet technology which only switches over
above a certain altitude and velocity - It might be able to accelerate right
out of the atmosphere but would be without propulsion or control with the added
risk of engine failure to restart. I can see it evolving to
http://www.salon.com/2013/11/04/climate_experts_to_enviros_the_time_has_come_to_embrace_nuclear_power/
I say we send all the pro nuclear weenies over to Fukushima to help clean
up the mess and only after will we listen to their argument about
installing more nukes
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:17 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
I am familiar with characterizing the FOBS type vehicle. FOBS (*Fractional
Orbital Bombardment System) *was a Soviet ICBM program in the 1960s that
after launch would go into a low Earth orbit and would then de-orbit for an
attack. It had no range limit and the orbital flight path would not reveal
Jones,
I also wish that other spectral anomalies were observed - besides the
broadband soft X-ray/EUV apparently due to hydrogen, but I believe that
the 19.29 nm line is due to the oxidized cathode/anode surfaces -
oxygen contamination.
However, I think this is a good experiment to repeat with
http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/120704/srep00492/full/srep00492.html
Magnetic light
One of the mysteries of the DGT reactor is how that device can produce such
a huge magnetic field just by heating a pile of dust.
Light can produce magnetism when the nanoparticles are configure correctly.
16 matches
Mail list logo
