Unfortunately for me, the 1 Dimensional Luttinger Bose-Einstein Condensate
seems to have already been proposed, but as far as I can tell, not as an
explanation of cold fusion:
***Also perhaps here.
New Journal of Physics http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/ Volume 10
Also perhaps here, this smart guy:
*A. Bhattacherjee* , Pradeep Jha, Tarun Kumar and ManMohan, Luttinger
liquid in superlattice structures: atomic gas, quantum dot and classical
Ising chain, *Physica Scripta*, *83*, 015016 (2011).
*Aranya B Bhattacherjee*, Tarun Kumar and ManMohan, Luttinger
I think this paper might address the coupling term in the Hamiltonian
you're asking about.
http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/3777/1/dalmonte_marcello_tesi.pdf
1.1.1 Mermin-Wagner-Hohenberg theorem
One of the main general results in 1D physics is related to the
so called spontaneous symmetry breaking
http://news.yahoo.com/paradox-solved-information-escape-black-hole-104543630.html
The BOSENOVA seen in the DGT might be a nanoscopic version of the
information restoration process proposed for the end of life process of
black holes.
Rovelli agrees: Information is never too concentrated, and it
And also perhaps here:
Note that they used lasers to REMOVE energy from the system (to COOL it).
That's what KP Sinha did, and also, what Ed Storms was unaware of here on
Vortex-L until I pointed it out.
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg77012.html
Over 107 billion.
Makes me wonder how many times I've been recycled.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newvortex/
Terry, et all.
Last night I discovered I can no longer post messages Vortex if I start a
new thread.
Apparently, I can only respond to a post like yours. What's weird is that if
I change the subject thread and then attempt to mail it the post immediately
comes back as undeliverable.
If I try
Kevin,
If experiments in any field can demonstrate a high temperature version of a
Luttinger Condensate, then your insight is valid and can push forward LENR
technology. That is the main issue with anything Bosonic - can it be applied
at high temperature.
All of the advances in LENR have
Pinging vortex.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newvortex/
Vortex let this go through. But then it clamped down again.
I still can't post a new subject thread. This is weird.
Steve
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 10:32 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Test -
Solar Hydrogen Trends claim:
Input 500 watts produces 2,797 cu.ft. H2 per hour, equivalent to 221.5
KWhr at a cost of $1.80
http://www.solarhydrogentrends.com/
Jones, these theoretical speculations have not been applied to cold fusion
simply because they have no relationship to showing how to make the effect work
on demand or to showing how the chemical environment plays a role. These are
examples of mental games physics encourages that may or may not
I'm wondering. I repeatedly tried to posting something on Vortex last night
and this morning. They have all been immediately returned as
Undeliverable. The post contained a You Tube link. It also contained two
additional web sites pertaining to what was in the You Tube video. I didn't
think there
From: Kevin O'Malley
And also perhaps here:
Note that they used lasers to REMOVE energy from the system (to COOL it).
That's what KP Sinha did, and also, what Ed Storms was unaware of here on
Vortex-L until I pointed it out.
The interesting thing about laser cooling is that the
May you enjoy the following momentary distraction...
I was recently queued in to the following You Tube video. Maybe you'll
experience a few moments of enjoyment as I did innocently watching it. It's
called We are from the Future. Lots of pretty special effects. Granted, it
gets a little
FYI,
This was the post I was trying to get out since last night. As best as I can
tell I think Vortex may have not liked the original You Tube URL. I never
really noticed this before but apparent YT links are secured (https). When I
converted the original link over at tinyurl Vortex stopped
If true, that is one heck of a claim - they would be claiming an over-unity
COP of 443 (44300%).
I checked the math. 2797 SCF of H2 - IS - equivalent to 221.5 kWH.
What I think is probably wrong is the 500W input - it must be a typo. They
must mean 500kW input. This would put their COP to be
The critical path seems to me to be:
1) Economically elicit statistically significant results.
2) Formalize that economical method in an experimental protocol.
3) Identify which theories make predictions about modifications to the
experimental protocol (establish a range of hypotheses).
4) Based
A good path James, but with a few potholes.
On Mar 15, 2014, at 10:30 AM, James Bowery wrote:
The critical path seems to me to be:
1) Economically elicit statistically significant results.
Rossi has done this but he has not reveal how.
2) Formalize that economical method in an
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:00 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
May you enjoy the following momentary distraction...
I'm happy you found your problem. You may ignore my private email.
Eskimo.com has all new hardware and some new software and you likely
On Mar 15, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Kevin O'Malley
And also perhaps here:
Note that they used lasers to REMOVE energy from the system (to COOL it).
That's what KP Sinha did, and also, what Ed Storms was unaware of here on
Vortex-L until I pointed it out.
Jones,
Bob,
No typo. Apparently the figures have been replicated by an independent
company
See http://www.solarhydrogentrends.com/SHT_performance%20_test.pdf
Adrian Ashfield
From: Edmund Storms
Jones, these theoretical speculations have not been applied
to cold fusion simply because they have no relationship to showing how to
make the effect work on demand or to showing how the chemical environment
plays a role.
Ed, that is simply
There is a performance report:
http://www.solarhydrogentrends.com/SHT_performance%20_test.pdf
I would suggest that the current figure is likely to be right, in that
100kA at 4V would require some interesting electrical enigineering, so
was the voltage actually nearer 5kV rather than 5V.
Jones, I know that you believe Pd-D and Ni-H involve two entirely different and
unrelated phenomenon. Consequently, a discussion is impossible because we are
discussing two entirely different concepts. You are so sure your concept is
correct, you feel free to be arrogant about your belief.
Ed and Jones--
I'm glad I believe in the old adage No Friction No Motion and that it
applies to debate of LENR.
Carry On.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Saturday, March 15,
Guys,
Impressive, but suspicious..
Given the name of the company - could it be 500 watts electric and 100,000
watts of solar ?
Or is this some type of LENR ?
From: Nigel Dyer
There is a performance report:
http://www.solarhydrogentrends.com/SHT_performance%20_test.pdf
I
Hi Terry, my old friend.
Yes, I did follow through to both web sites, the current one and the other
still under construction. It might be interesting to see what they
eventually post at the new cite. I assume they will post lots of far-off
stuff, some of it controversial. Maybe
Whoa! I never considered the merge.
But, my decision actually causing the split is a bit anthropocentric
and does not comply with string theory. Yes, I did consider that in
the haze of the cactus button; but, I found a conflict with
predestination. But, merge?
Thanks!
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On Mar 15, 2014, at 10:30 AM, James Bowery wrote:
3) Identify which theories make predictions about modifications to the
experimental protocol (establish a range of hypotheses).
I find that all the present accepted
On Mar 15, 2014, at 2:37 PM, James Bowery wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Mar 15, 2014, at 10:30 AM, James Bowery wrote:
3) Identify which theories make predictions about modifications to the
experimental protocol (establish a range of
The Rossi reactor is currently configured into two functional parts, the
mouse whose function it is to produce nanoparticles, and the Cat whose
function it is to catalyze these nanoparticles in a LENR reaction.
We can duplicate these functions by providing a nanoparticle source (mouse)
and a
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6OZykbnLQw
This demo shows how nanoparticles of water clusters can be reacted into
heat in an auto catalectic converter.
The HHO is the source of the nanoparticles mouse
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The Rossi reactor is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGWrJ9J5ffM
This video shows HHO interaction with and without nanoparticle contact with
the catalytic convertor substrate.
When the water crystals are allied to the catalytic substrate, full heat
capacity is produced. When the water crystals are filtered out of
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jczBXmr7yo
This continuous video shows startup of a HHO Hot Cat from room temperature
to 831F
I wonder what electrode that the water clusters of come off of, the
hydrogen electrode, the oxygen electrode or both.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Axil Axil
Dear Steven,
Thanks for sharing this video, I enjoyed it.
Kind regards,
Rob
36 matches
Mail list logo
