Geeze – did you read your own reference?
First of all, Kim’s main source is Sterling Allan. Never does Kim say that he
performed the experiment or saw the magnetic results for himself. This paper is
theoretical, hearsay, and beyond poor. It is an embarrassment to Purdue, if
nothing else.
Dear Craig,
For this new experimental setup, it will be a presentation Thursday, March
26 and I will translate it as soon as possible.
I think you have the papers published by Alexander till now, isn't it?
What is especially interesting you?
Greetings,
Peter
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 1:52 PM,
I just want to read over it; and after my last post, I was sent a copy.
Thanks.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Craig,
For this new experimental setup, it will be a presentation Thursday, March
26 and I will translate it as soon as possible.
Dear Friends,
The good news have arrived when I was sleeping, however they are really
good and bring the promise of even better news.
I publish this morning edition now:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/03/sweet-sunday-morning-lenr-news.html
See you again later,
Peter
PS. Have you
Bob,
I guess before I had presumed that the TC was on the inside based what I
saw in the picture and his previous design. In the updated report, it is
noted that *The thermocouple is fixed on surface of tube with fuel in the
middle of the tube. *I interpreted that to mean it was on the outside
Did Parkhomov publish his experimental protocol? If so, how can I get a
hold of it?
Craig
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Friends,
The good news have arrived when I was sleeping, however they are really
good and bring the promise of even
Axil's comment as to where the voltage must be measured to determine the
correct power in the reactor fuel is right. The problem is designing a t/c
connection that will remain in tact for any length of time at 1200 C. Once the
temperature drop across the active region of the alumina vessel is
Probability Enhancement via SPPJones--
Keep in mind that an SPP can generate large magnetic fields and these field
change the allowable spin states and their respective energy such that there is
a good possibility that resonant coupling can occur given the ever changing
magnetic fields and
Probability Enhancement via SPPJones--
There is no bremsstrahlung because there are no particles emitted with high
kinetic energy--only quantum spin energy is involved.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 8:11 AM
Wiki has a superficial entry for quantum probability
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_probability
and a more complete entry for S-Matrix
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-matrix
The crux of this post is to suggest that the alumina tube reactor operates
via an enhanced probability field favoring
Probability Enhancement via SPPJones--
As you may guess, I think the coupling is via exchange of spin energy/angular
among the participating particles in the nano coherent system, including the
lattice electrons.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To:
Here is how heat energy is transformed in a chain into an electron.
Heat
Heat produced dipole motion of an electron
formation of a spin based soliton where many electrons circle a vortex.(aka
SPP)
Projection of a magnetic anapole beam from the center of the electron
vortex(SPP) at over 140MeV
A lot of energy could be expended in the creation of electrons as a final
product of meson decay. How can we tell if the LENR reaction converts spin
into electrons.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Bob,
Spin could be heavily involved, as would be
Yes – positrons are not seen – and this is especially true since a specialized
meter which is tuned to detect positrons was used in some of Rossi’s testing -
with a sensitivity of picowatts. There was nothing above background.
Mesons are also not possible – since they are not produced by
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.5699.pdf
*The p and A mesons in strong abelian magnetic field in SU(2) lattice
gauge theory.*
The paper explains how a P mason can be created from condensation in the
vacuum by a magnetic field of the proper strength.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Jones Beene
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1108/1108.2203.pdf
*Vacuum as a hyperbolic metamaterial*
Magnetic Fields Turn the Vacuum into a Superconducting Superlens, Says
Physicist
It is both interesting and central in LENR to understand what is going on
inside the nuclear active environment.
Another
The reference I used puts magnetic field energy at about 140 MeV for meson
creation. I understand that you don't think that the SPP can produce this
magnetic power level.
But Dr Kim saw in DGT experiments magnetic solitons exploding in a
Bosenova. This is caused when the electron density in the
Eric--
I would have said you need particles like H with an intrinsic spin to couple to
the magnetic field. I think that 0 spin particles would not couple. I may be
wrong on this issue.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, March
http://www.physics.purdue.edu/people/faculty/publications/yekim/O-fusion.pdf
* Purdue Nuclear and Many-Body Theory Group (PNMBTG) *
*Preprint- PNMBTG-05-2014 (May 2014) *
In the above reference, Dr Kim explains his theory with regards to
Bosenova.
Please supply a reference for your assertion
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 4:58 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Alberto De Souza's message of Sat, 21 Mar 2015 23:16:09 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I completely agree. But I do not believe we are going to see large
differences between resistances, except in cases of heater failure. But
even
I would like to propose examining this binary (yes/no) hypothesis: A
reactor loaded with LENR fuel produces excess (non-chemical) heat. To test
this hypothesis, one has to run an experiment to test exactly that: is the
reactor with fuel hotter? Is it hotter for a long enough period of time so
as
A self feeding with some extra output energy reactor would overcome all
this, it's much more convincing and any magic trick to input energy into
it, like current inductance, can be easily be detected by a magnetometer.
It can be used as a black box, not revealing its contents, and all methods
of
Jones--
If the positrons were directionally controlled by the magnetic field, Rossi's
meter may not have been able to pick them up.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 11:21 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Probability
Bob,
There could be some directionality - but after annihilation the two 511 keV
gammas should be emitted in wide cone vectors, such that even if there is a
statistically preferred vector… something would show up. They are extremely
sensitive.
IIRC, it was curious that the Bianchini
David--
I recently saw a paper that suggest coupling of intrinsic spin of a particle to
electron orbital spin states, which I think was conserved spin. I will look
into my file to see, if I can come up with the paper later today--I am watching
NCAA now.
Also keep in mind that any energetic
First of all, Kim’s main source is Sterling Allan.
Are you saying that Dr. Kim as belittled himself for working with Sterling
Allan?
Never does Kim say that he performed the experiment or saw the magnetic
results for himself.
How would Kim get the idea about Bosenova, if he did not see
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
wrote:
A self feeding with some extra output energy reactor would overcome all
this, it's much more convincing and any magic trick to input energy into
it, like current inductance, can be easily be detected by a magnetometer.
I do not agree that energetic alphas are consistent with the stability of
nano systems. They cause to much damage to the lattice and would destroy a
coherent system. And for this reason I do not believe they happen in LENR,
at least the systems that can run for a long time. However, if the
You may be correct, however I can envision that there may be a conservation of
angular momentum in back to back gammas stemming from the spin of the positron
and electron. If the positron and electron are lined up with their spin vector
parallel or anti parallel, then the gammas may emerge in
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
They cause to much damage to the lattice and would destroy a coherent
system.
I doubt something with as high a temperature as is being reported for
systems like that of Rossi and Parkhomov is able to sustain any kind of
30 matches
Mail list logo
