Re: [Vo]: Jed's flowmeter comments chanllenged.

No, the doubters on this thread have hijacked the topic. Obviously there is dispute so the thing to do is to wait for hard evidence before jumping to wild conclusions and making wild ass guesses about every possibility of something being wrong. The waste of time and money is what Rossi has to

Re: [Vo]:Interesting Steam Calculation

From: a.ashfield "a pump byitself does not regulate the level of the water. " what is the point of having all those digitally controlled pumps if there is no control?

Re: [Vo]:Interesting Steam Calculation

I don't know any more than what Engineer48 wrote. I don't think there is any point in speculating at this time. The only reason I brought it up was because it gives the lie to what Murray claimed. On 8/21/2016 1:04 PM, David Roberson wrote: From: a.ashfield "a pump

Re: [Vo]: Jed's flowmeter comments chanllenged.

a.ashfield wrote: No, the doubters on this thread have hijacked the topic. Obviously there > is dispute so the thing to do is to wait for hard evidence before jumping > to wild conclusions . . . > The photo of the ceiling *is* hard evidence. It is not a wild conclusion

[Vo]:true friends of LENR tell the truth

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-21-2016-true-friends-of-lenr-tell.html Please use new facts, not old stories to contradict what I say peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

You know that saying something like this is a moot point, right? 2016-08-21 16:23 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell : > The mistakes you cite are imaginary. > > >

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

Daniel Rocha wrote: Yes, seriously. But, that's expected since I see all IH claims with many > mistakes, inaccuracies. > No, you do not. You yourself do not believe I.H., but you have not found any mistakes or inaccuracies. You don't believe them because you do not want

Re: [Vo]:Interesting Steam Calculation

I have not seen any evidence that the pumps are controlled by anything but a manual adjustment on the front. Why have 22 set at 100% and 2 set at 50% flow rate in that group of pumps? Also, Rossi did not utilize any form of automatic pump control during his earlier demonstrations. Show me a

Re: [Vo]:Interesting Steam Calculation

Good grief. Of course there is control or there would be no point in having all those pumps. On 8/21/2016 9:12 AM, a.ashfield wrote: "a pump by itself does not regulate the level of the water. " what is the point of having all those digitally controlled pumps if there is no control? On

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

/Seriously?? /I knew people in college who would pull stunts like that, along with writing a bunch of made-up stuff on their resumes, but calling it "normal" and treating it as honest business-as-usual is just bizarre. The policy of "We must excuse Rossi at any cost, with any fairy tale we

Re: [Vo]:JM Products misleading business card.

Yes, seriously. But, that's expected since I see all IH claims with many mistakes, inaccuracies. So, for me, it's the other way around. I see clearly ""We must excuse IH at any cost, with any fairy tale we can think of". And I pointed many of these. I don't have the parrot skill like Jed to repeat

Re: [Vo]:Interesting Steam Calculation

"a pump by itself does not regulate the level of the water. " what is the point of having all those digitally controlled pumps if there is no control? On 8/21/2016 12:55 AM, David Roberson wrote: Thanksfor the information. But AA, a pump by itself does not regulate the level of the water.

Re: [Vo]: Jed's flowmeter comments chanllenged.

Che wrote: This whole Rossi saga has hijacked most-all fruitful Cold Fusion discussion. > I agree. What is worse, I fear it may have sucked most potential funding out of the field. It is a terrible distraction, and a tragic waste of resources. Every dollar spent by

Re: [Vo]: Jed's flowmeter comments chanllenged.

I agree, This month I sold only one cold fusion book. Interest is at an all time low. -Original Message- From: Jed Rothwell To: vortex-l Sent: Sun, Aug 21, 2016 10:08 am Subject: Re: [Vo]: Jed's flowmeter comments chanllenged. Che

[Vo]:This September DOD review.

Forget Rossi. This September's DOD review could change the game. They have my book. How can it miss? Frank Znidarsic

Re: [Vo]:say NO to the LENR dystopias

Dear Che, idealistic systems including those of research do not work. Research and development are expensive. There can be ery local and very special exceptions, very temporary too. It is not abut greed it is realism, pragmatism, and materialism. Please do not answer with slogans but with facts.

Re: [Vo]: Jed's flowmeter comments chanllenged.

On 08/20/2016 11:04 PM, Che wrote: This whole Rossi saga has hijacked most-all fruitful Cold Fusion discussion. Um, yeah. Here's a quote from a Vortex message posted in December 2011 (emphasis added): Horace, and some other skeptics, have a much more obvious mission: Try to "talk